Re: In summary then ...
"He did but they too were accidentally thrown out with his collection of Napoleon memorabilia."
I see, and was that was next to his extensive slide collection of 20th century telegraph poles?
1842 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Oct 2010
Strangely, I've never been able to identify the boundaries of the SEP field and obviously I'd never knowingly circumvent the system ...
I always exist in the IBFI (Its Broken Fix It) aether ... "You're a computer tech - fix my computer chair ...", "You're the technician, fix my glasses", or even "You're the technician you can fix my intimate hair trimmer"
UK has committed to follow EU data protection policies. In simple terms, means your answer is no - we'll have a squabble with the EU over UK data sovereignty and our lovey-doveyness with the US and allowing giga-corps to suck us dry of data for free, then we'll cave in a bit until the next EU fan starts rotating.
I agree that it's outlived it's expected lifespan however a significant duststorm could have happened a week into the mission ... Off the top of my head, the ability to pull a simple rubber/carbon fibre/whatever cord across the surface of the panel to remove, say, 30% of mission-threatening build up and restore significant power levels would be simple, cheap and light with (potentially) mission saving abilities ... even if you could only do it once. Heck, if they can transport the mass of a hammer drill to Mars that even a numpty like me predicted wouldn't work except in perfect conditions, they can afford transport a tiny motor and a piece of string ...
It's a ponzi scheme - people at the top create the hype so people invest at the bottom, "look how much money you can make!" People at the top grab the investors cash and fill their buckets, people at the bottom get a lovely clean bucket.
People are stupid but at the same time it appears the financial authorities are either toothless or unwilling to control the scams ...
Have a look ... bet you'll see a Cityfibre team laying cables in the ground* outside the site.
*I won't use the term "install" as that infers some sort of skill, care and being concerned enough to at least attempt to not disrupt other services.
I'm sorry Dave, which communist channel do you want me to open?
Alexa I said communications, the bloody communications
I'm sorry Dave I don't have anything by The Bloody Communards. But here are some similarly bad albums I didn't find for sale on the internet as I'm obviously not connected to it ...
...
I'm sorry Dave, according to not-the-Internet you cannot do that with a banana, even in space ...
That's ok then ... if you are a crypto-scammer you may lose the accumulation of stuff that was worthless when you obtained it if you get caught. That sounds much like if you raid a bank and get caught you'll have to give back what you stole.
I wonder how they compute the energy efficiency as "900 times more efficient than a visa payment"? Perhaps they are privvy to the internal operating procedures, software and hardware systems of the VISA system? Or perhaps they are actually using their own referenced figures which appear to show that a Bitcoin transaction is about 1200000x the cost of a single VISA ... So allowing for a 99.95% energy reduction that means it's still 6000x less efficient than VISA. Or am I not seeing something?
There was a time when a Norton Utilities floppy was really useful. I believe I've even got a dusty copy of Peter Norton's MS-DOS book somewhere (probably alongside "Programming the Microsoft Mouse" ...). The rot set in when he sold to Symantec (1990 according to the font of all knowledge) who, even then, had built a reputation for bloat and system hogging and were only installed by lazy corporates and IT numpties.
The poster misunderstands and is simply comparing a.n.other RISC architecture with the RISC-V "standard" ... Seems people think RISC means RISC-V and it's all a bright and shiny new thing but we were working on RISC architectures in the 80's. The "open source model" is really the new feature but with (essential in my view) big company backing, from the likes of Google, how long will it be before it's driven and controlled by big companies, the likes of ... ?
James Burke was famously chastised for crossing his fingers during the moon landing. I don't care, mine will be firmly crossed for the launch and I hope the unfurling and initialisation goes to plan. JWST is not just a satellite, NASA's future credibility (in the eyes of the beancounters) relies totally on this working to spec ...
"Please enter a few details to confirm you account id ..."
"Name"
clickety
"Account number"
clack click tap
"Postcode"
Clickety clack tap
"First dog's inside leg measurement"
ffs ... paper rustles ... Aha, the sheet cunning disguised with the heading "memorable data" ... click click click
"Weight of left testicle"
click ... at least I remembered that one ...
Thankyou Mr Person. We will pass you to the webchat operator
<time passes>
"Hello. Can I have your name please"
clickety click
"Account number"
Clickety click
"Postcode"
Where's the "bloody off" button?
"Do some stuff. Waffle waffle... IT... world-beating... exponential... fight this battle... crush the enemy..."
I believe that was actually
"Do some stuff. Hic ego dico stercore anserem integrum. IT... world-beating expenditure... exponential financial outlay... fight this battle and privatise ... crush the people ..."
Don't understand.
If you don't want to use Amazon because they charge too much, use their own courier networks or whatever then don't. Set up your own web site and do the other thing.
When Amazon stops you setting up that web site or uses it's market presence to undermine your trading structure *outside Amazon* then it is anti-competitive behaviour. What seems to be happening here is based on complaints around how Amazon works and charges internally. Traders could just walk away if they could do better.
That's true - Eon find it so difficult to supply they've changed their supply name to Eon Next Energy or some other twaddle ... :-(
It's the energy brokers that are finding it difficult - the generators and suppliers are raking it in, the brokers are betting on the outcome ... If it was indeed a fair and open market, the "green energy" suppliers would not have had a price hike when oil prices went up ...
Dark background, light text does not cause the pupil to contract too much as it's predominantly dark - vice versa causes immediate contraction of the pupil resulting in dim, hard to read text for those with retinal problems which is why dark+light text conforms to the UK DDA requirements. Helpfully I'm currently typing this into a well formatted, white page with dark text web page which I can't alter ... so much for DDA ...
Cash is king? I tend to agree from the point of security. The sudden plethora of 'card machines' that don't look like card machines ...
"Just bonk your card please ... sorry, can you insert your card as we have successfully taken a photo of your signature and a cvv and just need to skim the other information ..."
Transputers caused much dribblage when I pretended to be a comp sci student.
Had to learn parallel processing techniques and Occam ... Very confused lectures, resulting in an unforgettable question from a student to a young lecturer "... but aren't you making this up as you go along?" The lecturer admitted that the stuff was so new that he was about a day ahead of us ... at which point we all softened our attitudes towards him as we realised that he was trying to keep us on the crest of a technology wave ... even if it meant buying the worst value book in history "The Occam Programming Manual" by Inmos which had multiple pages inscribed with the phrase "this page is intentionally left blank".
When will they announce 'a deal has been struck"?
a) Just before Christmas
b) just after Christmas
c) two days before the policy is due to start ...?
There's too much money (hundreds of millions) of "profit" (quoted as obviously Amazon don't make profit on any of those transactions ...) on both sides to not do the deal ...
Trouble is, lurking in the background is the general increase in financial fees. A charity I know refuse to take membership cheques any more as they cost too much to process, credit card fees have gone up and banking, which was relatively cheap for the charity, has more than quadrupled in cost. Hell, they even get charged for depositing cash in a bank that's ten miles away, now only opens two hours in the middle of the day and don't provide night safe facilities. Financial organisations are fleecing their customers and nobody is shouting (apart from Amazon who, to be fair, try to equally fleece everyone ...) I used to get annoyed at "old people" who kept their cash under the creaky floorboard and refused to used banking services ... I'm starting to think they were right.
I would suggest a slightly different opinion. An optional upgrade that *you* choose to apply which fails could *possibly* be deemed your problem (I don't agree with that point of view but hear me out ...)
If however the supplier insists that your device, for continued operation, is automatically updated by that supplier, then I would suggest the full and continued operation of that device is the responsibility of the supplier. In the UK at least, I believe consumer law still decrees that goods should continue to be fit for purpose for a reasonable lifetime - electrical equipment used to be ten years from purchase - otherwise there was a reasonable case to claim recompense from the manufacturer/supplier. I'm not sure whether Brexit has changed that rule but I don't believe so.
In this case, a device being bricked by the supplier when only three years old (deliberately or otherwise) certainly contravenes the 'reasonable lifetime' clause ...
I'll have to look into the depths of the consumer regulations but I'm sure suggested reasonable lifetimes are still there.
why the UK government has any ultimate power over the sale of a foreign owned company, obviously considered in the past not not to be a financial or security concern to the UK because it was allowed to be sold to that overseas investment group? HM Gov had the legitimate option to control the company before it left UK ownership but currently it isn't a UK company any more than Toyota or The Tokyo Scorchio-Noodle Emporium.
Wasn't there a ruling (many moons ago) that MS Windows licence was unenforceable as you had to open the product seal before you read that "opening the seal implies acceptance of the licence"? Isn't this a similar situation - you have to open and install the unit before finding that you are implicitly accepting the terms of data collection? That (in cookie terms) would certainly be illegal as you are not being given the clear option to decide what data can be collected before it is collected.
However that is one of two points here which have been muddled, data collection is one part (not the primary target of the article), the second being advertising on the (in my experience) Freeview EPG. Now, as the EPG is part of the Freeview service which declares itself free to all users, isn't this advert injection unfairly "charging" some users with additional advertising overhead? Interesting to hear Freeview's take on this ... or perhaps they also take a cut ...
but perhaps it's Chinese weather detailing the words "smog" and "pollution"? Perhaps cargo manifests listed "cheap tat for the UK Christmas buying muppets" or "iPhone clones", or airline manifests detailing "holiday jaunts for the autocracy"?
None of them are "security issues" in Western eyes but all would be 'sensitive information' for the Chinese authorities.
I believe that Huawei will use their massive Chinese (and non sanctioned trading partners) to actually build their r&d and product base, increase self reliance and thus become more dominant in the world. I think that the US sanctions based to a large extent on protectinism will come to bite the US-centric world hard in a few years time.
They will ideally have multiple images as part of the training - ten images of hypothetical person Malcolm X would make identification of that face more accurate from less than ideal photos. How many images could they scrape from Average Joe's social media presence, 10? 100? These are not just those posted by Average Joe but also those shared with Average Joe. The numbers rapidly add up. I suspect the whole of Alabama (for instance) could probably give 1bn training pictures for "id" delivery to the local law enforcement ... not inferring anything, just a totally random state you understand. Even His Trumpyness' historic media presence would probably generate tens of thousands of shared hits ...
I wonder how they associate id with any photograph - I would assume that any "image X is heavily associated with Profile Y" to allow further investigation rather than putting a name to a face ...
but he's declared that his virtual reality headsets will be sold below cost.
Doesn't that immediately undermine every company selling VR kit at a sensible profit?
If that is indeed the case, isn't this declaring that Facebook is using its monopolistic position to undermine other businesses around the world?
Isn't that saying "get the lawyers ready for anti-competitive behaviour" court battles for the next ten years?
The trouble with Zuckenberg is 7/8 of what his company does isn't visible on the surface ...
ConnectBeam was contacted in 2008 for some discussions, Cisco said thanks for talking to us and walked away. ConnectBeam subsequently collapsed "as it had lost its biggest customer" ... Was Cisco purchasing from / making some kind of financial investment in ConnectBeam or is "the customer" someone else entirely?
No doubt Cisco probably did steal IP - that's the way of big corp nowadays - but I don't understand the background.
Here is one of the big problems - the focus has moved from a semi-objective "man on the Clapham omnibus" to a subjective "ooh, that upset me".
Actually I believe it has all to often moved another step to "ohh, that may have upset someone else". That is where the mission-creep needs to be watched. Allowing people to take offence by proxy can potentially result in a stick to beat all and sundry.
"How large is the snapshot and does the machine have room for it? (Consider especially old laptops.)"
You are joking? I don't believe "Windows 11" and "old laptops" are allowed to be used in the same sentence excepting possibly "Why would anyone bother installing Windows 11 on old laptops?"