Re: Win95 @Mage
"Rubbish compared to NT3.5"
Except that NT had much tougher hardware requirements, and had poor backwards compatibility with DOS software. On purely architectural merits NT and others beat it hands down, no question.
"Plus: The new desktop instead of Program Manager."
Compared to DOS/Win3.1 there were more than just that. Long file names and just a general ease of use for the home users not accustomed to using command line. With Windows you could just plug in hardware and have some expectations of Windows finding it and having it working instead of guessing the serial port addresses and interrupts for COM3 or finding the correct mouse driver and not worrying about having the base 640k exhausted and thus not having enough memory for programs to launch.
"Only later OEM Version b had USB"
WIndows 95, released surprisingly in 1995, predates USB. NT - released in 1996 (post USB) didn't.
"Encouraged bad practices on Program Application development."
Please explain. Microsoft has been offering coding guidelines since before Win95.
"It's been downhill since 1995 for MS"
"All they needed was to put the new shell on NT3.5 and have a game console with Win95. Idiots."
Are you from Bizarro world??
Bill Gates and his cohorts weren't idiots - still the richest man alive? The company is still a behemoth and steadily making money and ruling on PC platform. They've made lots of stupendous mistakes but Windows 95 was really the point where they left the competition behind on personal computers.