On the bright side
Putin doesn't need to write a new statement denying it. He can just recycle the Drumpf ones.
3782 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Oct 2010
Out of idle curiousity, given that Crimea has been invaded and occupied by a foreign government, what use are grid pylons between Crimea and the rest of Ukraine? Surely a sensible approach would be to cut the power anyway, so whether the pylons are up or down is irrelevant.
Shooting on sight sounds reasonable - but see other Reg story about Fark being blocked from Google for publishing picture of 19yo girl which a respected psychologist said was clearly of a child. Who defines a child? In the UK it means 'dressed as a schoolgirl even if you're 73'. Thankfully guns are hard to get in the UK.
The smart jeans are naff, or at least their suggested use. But haptic feedback from satnav is a brilliant idea. I seem to remember seeing something last year about shoes with it fitted. And haptic feedback works even when audible instructions are impractical.
How about when you're wandering through a big, strange city? Holding expensive phone in hands is recipe for robbery. Or you're carrying things in both hands? Or if you're blind - guide dogs avoid obstructions, but they don't usually respond to "take me to Nando's". How about police, military or James Bonds trying to silently approach a target? And @YeahRights biking and cycling of course.
Someone could make serious money with a bluetooth gadget that hits in the shoes, or on the wrist or wherever.
Pledged. At the rate this is going, ElReg commentards could fund this by ourselves!
(But what happens to El Reg when we're all in gaol?)
[One weakness on the Liberty sign-up page - they ask us to share on FB and Twitter, but that would like the real me, and my credit card, to my definitely unreal FB and Twitter accounts]
So the cop accepts it can't work but still thinks it should be considered. Hmmm....
I've got an even better idea. As any fule kno, 16-year-olds, hackers or not, are unable to get up before mid-day. So we just change their watches (okay, clock on their phones) so they always show 8am and they'll never wake up. Or even better, stop the sun in the sky just after sunrise.
Actually it would be fun to have a working jammer - kids all over the place sitting in Starbucks, sipping a latte and reading a book - and causing some very angry customers.
Having the misfortune to be born in America does not excuse illiteracy. The word is derived from the greek παῖς • (paîs) m, f (genitive παιδός);, (not to be confused with the Welsh pais=petticoat) and traditionally in real English was spelt pædo-whatever. Pedo-philia sounds like one of those odd Latin/Greek hybrids like tele-vision.
Or, to put it another way, "Once you sign a contract with X as an employee you are strung up to their terms and conditions that can be very restrictive" - that's the point - if they're too restrictive then you ain't an independent contractor, no matter what the 'employer' tries to say.
And let's face it, independents tend to pay rather less in taxes than combined employer+employee - that's the loophole Uber are trying to wiggle through. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...
It's not that dissimilar to the old IR35 arguments that we had. Basically if you are told exactly what to do, where and when then you're an employee. For heaven's sake, one place I worked we had 'contractors' who had worked there full time for seven years and played for the company football team!!
If Uber simply set some minimum standards, and allowed drivers to bid for a job at a rate the driver offered, when they felt like doing a job, then they might get away with it. No wonder they're looking at autonomous cars! (Although what's the betting they attract a special tax levy - I seem to remember that in the early days of motor cars that employers paid a tax on chauffeurs)
How about a cooker that detects a ring/oven has been on with no pan on/in it for x minutes and turns it off.
Even simpler, and no net connection required.
I suspect there are high end cookers that already offer this, otherwise I'd patent the idea.
is basically bread and circuses. Ask about drones and the thought process is Drones = Bling = tech toys = Yay, fun! No thought of the implications. If you asked 'the public' if they should each be given a million quid I'm fairly sure they'd say yes, without thinking through the implications for inmflation, savings etc.
Basic problem is that 'the people' are not renowned for clear analytical thinking. There is much evidence for this <feel-free-to-ignore-if-you-voted-wrexit-or-trump>, just think of certain recent public polls in the UK and the US</feel-free-etc>
It's very depressing for someone who is at heart convinced that democracy is a good thing to discover that the opinion of 'the public' is generally not a good guide as to the most sensible thing to do.
I did wonder about that. If the drones can only be used once due to inability to reach 45000 ft, where do they land? Do they park a container nearby for them to home in on,before sending the full container aloft to the mother ship?
And what about weight? Presumably drones won't be used to deliver a new 55" TV to a fan at a football match, so presumably it'll be fairly small items. In which case the majority of the payload of the mothership at take-off will be one-shot drones.
And how is this a better way to get T-shirts to football fans than having a stand outside the ground?
Or are they assuming a very, very high attrition rate for the drones from local shotgun owners?
Whatever, it's really an expensive solution in search of a non-existent problem. I reckon Amazon are just winding people up.
I think I'm with John Deere here, sort of. Perhaps the compromise is to say that anyone can read and tinker with software but it's a serious offence for modified software to be used in public.
The thought of a combine harvester racing down the High Street at 80mph because some 'smart' teenager decided to modify the software and confused metres and miles doesn't bear thinking about
Secure communication is a problem. It's less of a problem if the parties communicating can communicate safely and securely in advance to agree their protocols, and when they have a limited number of messages that they may want to transmit. Then you can use the good old system of odd phrases which mean something different - but not coded. Basically you can then post messages publicly, like in the old Times Personal Column.
e.g. Sammy Snowfish: the rhubard grows well this month.
Which the recipient knows means that the operation will start on time, as planned.
Peterkin Rabbit: send 15kg of anthracite to usual address at once
Operation will start at 7.30am against alternate target.
Precision in language is important, have a +1
In fact, I dunno about Cerebral Palsy, but when I were a young ElReglet the term 'spastic' was most usually applied to those poor sods who were partially crippled from childhood polio, and had to wear a metal leg caliper. There was a bloke in my year in school with the problem. And who remembers the large collecting boxes for 'The Spastic Society' that stood on pavements, and were shaped like a boy wearing a leg caliper?
Sounds plausible. I can think of several 'domestic' use cases that can use speeds of 20+Mbps. House with several teenagers all streaming Netflix? Small business? But average houshold wathcing a bit of iPlayer and surfing amazon? No. We're getting FTTP in a few weeks, but I've still not worked out a way to justify going for more than 76Mbps nominal. The 20Mbps upload is what I'm really looking forward to - 8 hours for 1 GB at the moment (887kbps).
I know we will never need more than 640K of RAM, but what the hell will we need Gigabit connections for in the next decade or two? When we can teleport ourselves down the line, maybe, but not just yet.
And quality is important too. We upgraded to ADSL2+ a few months ago and my line was re-trained to 17.5Mbps. Nice. Except there were so many errors it was unusable. Cranked back down to 10 and it's fine.
Never mind the quality, feel the bandwidth.
I see T May is urging us not to be cowed by terroriists. As far as I can tell, the only people cowed by terrorists are the editors of certain 'newspapers' and the government. The IPA is un-necessary, knee-jerk legislation, introduced by a weak government, too frightened of being called soft on terrorism by the editor of the Daily Heil to fight for the fundamental freedoms that the terrorists want removed.. The Government is dong their work for them.
I say fec the government and fec the terrorists.
Interesting that the Govt are objecting to the decision, as they already have appropriate limitations and safeguards in place.
To which I answer:
"Welsh Ambulance NHS Trust"
"Food Standards Scotland"
Two of the many, many non-security and police agencies who can browse all our data on the say-so of a lowly manager.
Resorting to major generalisations is rather unbecoming
No, no, no, my good sir or madam.Making wild and generally unfounded generalisations an an attempt to make a mildly funny point is an essential part of an El Reg comment. You want sad and serious? Go to 21st Century Clown World.com
" Apple can't repatriate profits to the US without paying US corporation tax on them"
Except when a kind President thinks that it would be a good idea to have an amnesty and let profits be repatriated tax free or at a very low rate (plus a generous donation to his election fund). Now, which Prez seems the most likely to do something like that?
"Once BREXIT happens our Gubbermint can do those very same deals and the EU can go piss into the wind."
Errrmmm....no actually. Well, technically yes, but most international trade treaties tend to include bans on that sort of thing as it would be unfair. You want to trade tariff-free with the EU? No state aid. If the idiots in the UK govt decided to go for that sort of help then I doubt many companies would come here as they couldn't sell UK made stuff abroad.
By heck, and they told us this Wrexit thing would be easy.
" the BBFC is apparently to be tasked with "blocking" unsuitable material,
A moment spent thinking about how they will do this makes me worried about whether allowing the BBFC to deploy ground-to-space missiles and lasers to take out naughty satellites is perhaps going a tad too far.
Although the Welsh Ambulance Trust to get to see all our browsing histories so they can fight terrorism, so perhaps it is proportionate.
Lovely board/card game. Aim is to assemble nuclear warheads and delivery systems and wipe out your opponents in a nuclear attack. Lovely game.
The sting in the tail is that when someone loses they can launch all their remaining stuff back, which tends to wipe out the attacker.
A very common result is that everyone ends up dead. Hmmm....