China?
Nice to see Europe selling cheap plastic toys to China for a change. Well, expensive plastic toys...
3782 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Oct 2010
Meat in a pasty?
There was an interesting lady on Radio Cymru yesterday talking about Cornish pasties (celebrating Gool Piran) and she said that originally (c.14th century) they were just root veg, onions etc. Potatoes and then meat came later.
For modern usage, she recommended skirt as the meat.
She may be wrong, but so are peas and carrots!
The govt only really worry about being able to hack into your secure communications when they might be interesting - email and messaging, location, financial transactions. GCHQ won't worry too much if they can't decipher an instruction that tells your hall light to switch on or off. Until that is, some nasty trrrst network decide to communicate secretly by sending morse code via bedside lights... Upgraded light bulbs could have a small LED display that decodes the morse. (Can I patent that idea as the next WhatsApp?)
But I wish it was.
The guidelines are a good starting point. They stick to approaches and principles rather than being too specific (must use encryption type ABC-123 etc).
Having some form of kitemark to show the device conforms to the standards would help, with a ban on sale in the EU without one.
But: what happens when a manufacturer is, in all good faith, flogging a conformant product, and a hole in the encryption is found and exploited? Do they have to pull any unsold items? Stop production until hole is fixed? Issue a product recall?
Problem 2: the no pw reset thingy. Many of these devices will be plug in and forget. What happens 3 years down the line when a fix needs to be installed, and the piece of paper with the admin password on has long been recycled? No way to reset password? Bin the device or just live it with an unplugged hole?
I really have no idea what they're on about, but it sounds like pretty ace boffinry.
I think it means that whenever I'm connecting to a server in distant parts of the planet, provided the people who own the big interweby pipelines-under-the-ocean (PLUTO (c) Winston Churchill?) cough up for an upgrade, then I should get a faster connection with lower latency. Possibly.
Some years ago, the company I worked for invested in some '4GL' technology (4th generation language - actually a code generator called TELON). A couple of us got it all working, and then came the Global Conference in Texas. Who went to discuss the details of this new wizardry? The people who knew what it did, how it worked and could benefit from networking with other users? No chance, off go the managers.
When they came back they were a bit shame-faced, as they hadn't really understood very much. Tell you what, they said, there's a European User Conference coming up in a couple of months. You guys can go to that. Yippee! Where is it? Paris, Frankfurt, Madrid? Scarborough!
@Blottoits actually us citizens that are doing the subsidising
True, but....
What is the purpose of government? It is (in theory) a mechanism for us to work together for the common good. Once a project for the benefit of all is identified, the government routes the money from us as individuals to that project. Our present government has identified that it will benefit us all to have WMDs capable of killing hundreds of millions of foreign men, women and children. We can't each afford to buy our own WMD, so we will do it jointly, and will happily contribute £200 billion to this worthwhile cause.
Power infrastructure is no different, fundamentally. If we as a society believe that getting rid of ICE vehicles and replacing them by a clean alternative, EVs or hydrogen or whatever, then there will be a cost to providing the infrastructure. Unlike WMDs some of us may be able to generate some or all of our own leccy, reducing the infrastructure demand, and clearly a wide use of a mix of decentralised renewables (hydro, wind, solar, tidal) will also reduce the infrastructure impact, but not eliminate it entirely. We will need to spend money on infrastructure one way or the other, and that means we work together through a system of taxation. It's not a 'subsidy', it's working for the common good - and will probably be cheaper than the WMDs. I know which I'd prefer.
Restricted address space?
If they can't handle logging every activity of every IPv6 address, perhaps the spooks should float a new standard, IPv4.5 - like IPv4 but a bit bigger - shove a 5th group at the end, max value 4 - and they could include built in tracking and logging for all packets as part of the standard.
I used to (vaguely) understand IPv4.
I think I need to do a bit of reading up about this mystical IPv6 thingy. Just done an ipconfig on my Win10 lappie (with BT fibre router) and it's reporting 2 IPv6 addresses, plus a dozen 'Temporary IPv6 addresses' (using the prefixes of the first two) plus a link-local IPv6 address. What the heck?
That does actually raise some interesting questions? What is the scope of trademark/patent/copyright law? I'm pretty sure it doesn't extend off-planet. So could someone put a satellite in lunastationary orbit that projects a giant video of Snow White or Bambi on the lunar surface without Disney being able to sue?
As usual, government only interested in saving money, and creating Big Brother.
The paper census has a lot going for it. I can still look at the schedules from 1841, without having to wonder how I can get a copy of Windows -37 or Office 1848 to read it. Censuses are a primary source for studying and understanding our history, albeit imperfect - not that our governments are famous for wanting to learn from the past. Live in it? Yes, but not learn from it. And given their habit of totally ignoring evidence that disagrees with their knee-jerk prejudices, why do they want any data at all?
We need to keep the paper census. Yes it costs, but it's worth it. Add a few more questions each time, and keep the data completely separate from other government databases. And in a hundred years our great-grand-children can look at them, see how bad great-grandma's handwriting was, and marvel at great-grandpa being a Jedi Knight!
Yes, yer honour, we accept that installing a webcam in <insert attractive celebrity's name here>'s shower without a valid warrant was technically illegal, but we acted in good faith as we honestly believed she wasn't putting her empty shampoo bottles into the correct recycling bin.
Handful o' cold gravel for breakfast...
1GB, 800MB? 500MB? Eee, you were lucky!
When I was at University, learning to code in the mid 70s, they had these massive de-mountable disk packs which, if I remember rightly, had a capacity of 2MB each! You needed special permission to use them.
I remember paying £250 for a 256MB hard drive.
I found an old PC magazine from about 1982 a few years ago, and worked out that if a machine had been available then with the spec of my laptop at the time, it would have cost about £50 million - in 1982 money! Lord knows how much my present phone would have set you back!
Been there, done that.
Come to think, most IT learning is chasing things heading toward obsolescence
Looking back over 44 years of coding and related things, there has been a lot of learning, but also a lot of forgetting. Mainly detail stuff. I can no longer remember the commands for various IBM MVS SORT statements, but I don't think I ever could. I had a card (still in a drawer somewhere) that reminded me. Ditto the syntax of Fortran IV. But I'm still coding.
The things that matter are not the details. It's the ability to analyse problems, design clear solutions, develop test strategies and persuade users to reveal what they are actually trying to achieve, rather than what they think they want/need (cf. earlier article this week on wanting a Print button)
Those are the skills I learning in the 1970s, and I'm still using them today. Teaching people to code is one thing, but it's just scratching the surface of the job skills.
@codejunky
but why would the EU's stance on freedom of movement have diddly squat to do with our choosing to allow people to enter this country even from the EU to help on farms?
The EU's stance has no relevance. The problem is May's stance.No foreigners. Remember that one of the major advantages of Brexit is meant to be that we can chuck out all these working foreigners who contribute so much to our economy. (We can already chuck out the non-working ones after three months without leaving the EU, but May just couldn't be arsed). No foreigners is what 17.4 million people asked for. It would be a tad silly to have a Brexit to expel the foreigners, and then let them all back in again. After all, there must be some advantages to Brexit? Surely? No, go on, something, please? Just a little thing? Okay, no.
@codejunky
but why would the EU's stance on freedom of movement have diddly squat to do with our choosing to allow people to enter this country even from the EU to help on farms?
The EU's stance has no relevance. The problem is May's stance.No foreigners. Remember that one of the major advantages of Brexit is meant to be that we can chuck out all these working foreigners who contribute so much to our economy. (We can already chuck out the non-working ones after three months without leaving the EU, but May just couldn't be arsed). No foreigners is what 17.4 million people asked for. It would be a tad silly to have a Brexit to expel the foreigners, and then let them all back in again. After all, there must be <bold>some</bold> advantages to Brexit? Surely? No, go on, something, please? Just a little thing? Okay, no.
Retail has always been really crap compared to IT!
1. Rubbish pay
2. Rubbish hours
3. Grovelling to the public.
A friend used to be a manager for a small clothing shop, part of a chain. Was expected to stay behind to do stock-taking etc with no extra pay. Was not allowed to take any holiday for first 12 months - had to earfn it before taking it. (I suspect this may not be illegal). Quit and got a junior management job with John Lewis Partnership - much better terms as the Partners (staff to you and me) own the shop.
@FIA
"The reality is, sometimes things take longer than estimated, which incurs extra costs, some of which are peoples time. Otherwise you're just making accountants look good.
Yep, but estimates are just that, estimates, not fixed-price quotes. And if the management accept those estimates, then they work to them. If they turn out to be too low, why should you work for nothing to get things back on track? Didn't they include some contingency for just that? And what if the estimates are wrong because of duff info from management in the first place?
And if they insist on you working free hours to correct under-estimates, will they also let you have extra time off with pay if you come in under estimate? Sauce for the goose...
@AC
She seems to be asking for overtime on top of a salary, which we'd all love to have.
What's wrong with that? Is this some strange USian notion that if you are paid a monthly salary, rather than hourly, that makes you a slave who can be forced to work 24/7 without any extra compensation? Next you'll be saying they can be sacked without reason or compensation.
Microsoft are probably no worse than many big employers.
I fail to understand this difference between 'professional' and other workers for overtime. A job basically comprises a contract to work X hours for Y pay. Okay, in a managerial/professional/senior setting you may vary your hours from 9-5 to get a job done, but then you take time off later.
In a previous life my manager tried that "unpaid overtime, professional, paid to do a job, yada yada ..." line on me. I gently explained the idea that a definition of professional is 'paid to do something' and that the opposite is 'amateur' - does something for fun without pay. I suggested if he wanted a professional job, then he needed to pay for it. The alternative was getting some incredibly amateur work - which would end up costing the company a lot more.
I got the overtime, but I also took voluntary redundancy soon after (and went straight into a better-paid new job which didn't question overtime rates)
Not at all surprising, but there is a good side. Think of this as crowd-sourcing your baby-sitting. Instead of paying vast sums to a teenager who raids your fridge, booze cupboard and porn collection, while doing squishy things with her boyfriend on the sofa, you can just rely on thousands of people out on t'interwebs to watch junior for you.
I think I prefer to stick to handling my own money, thanks.
Physical debit card for debits
Separate credit card with very limited spending limit for online transactions (but prefer Paypal)
Paypal only from one computer, requires password every time, and uses 2FA
No other credit cards
Bank transfers online - one computer only
Cheques (rarely)
Cash
And I'm sure some toerag will still manage to relieve me of my dosh one day - but I'm not going to make it easier for them with Google Pay!
Not sure about logins via login screen, but the amusing one is looking at system logs and the insane number of people robots trying to login to a Wordpress admin panel. Bit strange as I don't run Wordpress (obvs).
That's closely followed by the vast number of attempts at a SQL injection.
One would think that ISPs could come up with some tools/scripts to identify and block these scum - they are wasting a lot of bandwidth to no real purpose.
Yes, it does sound like a bit of a timewarp - for 'power users'. My 7 year-old lappie also has 8GB, and 18-month old one has 16GB and lots besides. But I'm a developer.
I also have a nice little HP jobbie with 2GB and which doesn't even have a proper SSD - 32GB of on-board memory and it happily runs Win 10. Obviously not for running mega-spreadsheets, but it's fine for checking e-mails, browsing amazon, watching a bit of telly etc, and it can actually be used for typing, unlike a phone. For some people that may be perfectly adequate. Personally I regret the death of the cheapo notebook format like the old Acer Aspire 1.
So, no, budget laptops with 4GB which can't upgrade to 128GB aren't ludicrous. They meet the needs of many customers - but it's important that they are sold as what they are, not mega-gaming machines.
rural agricultural labour force that has sinced moved to the cities
but their hovels picturesque cottages have been bought up by aspiring middle class refugees from t'smoke, who demand fast fibre to watch Nigella and upload the script of their latest rural steamy bonkbuster.