3046 posts • joined 1 Oct 2010
No excuse really
I am not a fan of Wordpress, largely because of the security issues.
But it can be used in a way that is probably not noticeably less safe than most other systems.
1. Install a decent security plugin, and switch on all the options (I've been use All in One WP Security) - that will block a lot of nasty attack vectors, and also set things up for AUTOMATIC UPDATE of WP! Jesus! How difficult can it be!
2. DON'T install those tempting little plugins from god-knows-where. The ones that will turn out to have an interesting hole, 3 years after the sole developer died in a terrible tragedy involving cold soup, a rhododendron and stolen bitcoins.
3. Only use WP for fairly straightforward sites, ideally brochureware. If it's going to be running e-commerce, look elsewhere.
4. And if you're paranoid, look out for some really solid hosting. I run a number of shared hosting packages, but keep the WP sites on a separate package so any successful attacks can't access more important stuff.
Dear Papua New Guinea
Please, please give us a free trade agreement on good terms or Port Moresby gets turned to glass.
Love n hugs
You know, it might just work. Well, more likely than his other plans
Of course, Scottish students don't pay any tuition fees if they study in Scotland.
Damn that evil SNP!
Re: Simplistic solution to two problems
I see what you're thinking, but the way to low-carbon energy doesn't involve creating nuclear waste. Similar skills (good engineers) could be utilised to develop and manufacture tidal, wind and solar power. Scotland is already a world leader in research, and an excellent location for tidal. Let's make it a leader in actually making the things!
Useful rule of thumb
When your SSD/HDD is getting full, you look for a few large, unwanted files to delete, rather than thousands of tiddly ones.
So, and I'm thinking out loud here, if we don't have a magic money tree and need to cut back, perhaps dropping a few large items of unnecessary expenditure could help to balance the books. As a start we could save £53 billion by dropping the WMDs, and god knows how much by dropping the National Plan for Economic Suicide. Oh yes, and no more magic bungs. More sensible than closing lots of public toilets and care homes.
Then we probably COULD spend £350m a week on the NHS. Curing people not killing them.
Oh yes, and of course, go for an independent England so there's no need to 'subsidise' Wales, Scotland and NI any more.
Seriously impressive engineering. How come there is less coverage of this than similar (but less complicated) European and USian projects?
I think the situation is different to your auntie (gawd bless 'er). A Cliff Richard 'gig' to use the modern parlance, has a strictly limited number of tickets available, and demand may well exceed supply, so queueing may be the only way to be sure of getting a ticket.
Apple phones are not in limited supply. Demand will not exceed supply, at least in the medium term. On the day, perhaps, but who cares about a day, or a week, or a month wait? I assume they have a working phone already, so it's not as if they are cut off from the world and society. It's just wanting to be one-up to queue on day 1. Wanting a new Apple gadget may be basically reasonable (or may not, we all have views on that) as is wanting to see Cliff Richard.
Queueing in the rain to spend sillty money just to show off is not a healthy thing. If they really like Apple just get a refurb 6+ for £250 and give the other grand to charity!
While I suppose it's not incorrect to say that it is the capital of England, it's not an independent country any more than Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland are.
I'm tempted to have a decent flutter at Paddy Power on whether England will be a sovereign, independent state again within ten years, for the first time in many centuries. Get rid of those blasted Celts! Viva la Revolutión Inglés! #indyengland.
I'd vote for moving the UK population to move to Mars.
Good idea. We can build two large spaceships - the L Ark and the R Ark. The L Ark would leave first (as is their right) and never be heard from again. The R Ark would experience technical issues and have to cancel lift-off, with the colonists forced to Remain in a (much less crowded) UK.
but having no plan to leave was brexiters fault
Errrm....it was their great idea. You mean they hadn't prepared a detailed plan for when their wish was granted? Who did they expect to do the donkey work?
Can we have a new referendum: Should the UK population move to Mars?
When we vote Yes we'll leave it to the government to work out the details. It'll be the easiest mass-migration in history.
[I am getting too cynical and sarcastic. But what else is left? Running wild in the House of Commons with a Combine Harvester just isn't my style.]
Re: No shit, Sherlock?
You're going in the right direction. Killing people is wrong. And anyway, we'd have to pass a law to make killing MPs legal, and they're unlikely to do that.
But in terms of Cabinet members (and others - Farage)...
Treason Act 1351, as amended reads:
"or be adherent to the King’s Enemies in his Realm, giving to them Aid and Comfort in the Realm, or elsewhere, and thereof be [X4probably] attainted of open Deed by [X5the People] of their Condition"
1. Brexit will cause massive damage to the UK
2. Who would want that to happen?
3. Only enemies of the Queen and the UK. e.g. Putin - who welcomes Brexit and kills people in the UK. Sounds like an enemy to me.
4. So, by implementing Brexit, they are giving Aid and Comfort
5. The People can attest to that.
Which makes them guilty of High Treason, which no longer has the death penalty. But they can spend the rest of their days on Dartmoor, breaking rocks and picking oakum.
Can we crowdfund a prosecution?
Re: Y2K all over again
nothing too serious will happen
True. People won't be able to fly, and the queues at Dover will start to grow.
After a few days in the queue things start to get nasty, as mobs of lorry drivers roam the Kent countryside looking for food and water.
After a couple of weeks the rotting food in the lorries has attracted rats, which breed rapidly. Bubonic plague sweeps southern England.
And after a month or two the insulin supply dries up. Theresa May is okay, as she gets private supplies imported by sea from the USA.
The last makes me wonder: would an insulin-dependent diabetic be likely to get off by claiming 'self defence' if the started slaughtering pro-Brexit MPs before the final vote?
But it's quite evident that many who voted for Leave had other ideas, including a soft, negotiated exit.
I think many of them belonged to the "I still want to use the golf course even though I've resigned and no longer pay subs" tendency.
Re: Couldn't have said it better myself
Exactly. I voted Remain, and will continue to do so. The EU is an essential part of the future of the countries in the UK and the continent of Europe - and the world.
But I don't pretend it's perfect and infallible! This is just another example of the imperfections, which are best tackled from inside the organisation.
There has been much discussion about the pros and cons of Brexit. In recent months there has been a growing list of very specific things that will definitely be worse, or no longer available, or cost more after we leave. The precise numbers may be open to debate, but the trend is very clear.
Remind me, what are the specific and definite benefits of leaving? And that doesn't include 'the possibility of a Free Trade Agreement with Vanuatu'.
@AC (There's a lot of AC comments here, wonder why?)
Just leave Scotland in the EU and put all trade through there
Ideally, Scotland, Wales and a united Ireland. (Latest Welsh polling shows strong Remain support now - the original referendum had a lot of stuff you Cameron behind the vote, and farmers who thought it would cut down on the paperwork! Which it will of course - no more payments, so no paperwork!)
Anyway, that wouldn't solve it. There would then be a hard border between the glorious kingdom of Little England and Wales/Scotland.
Face it, the vast majority of citizens of the disUK are going to get battered, unless they own a hedge-fund in Ireland or a German passport.
Re: The punishment beating will continue
Strangely, now that I look at it, that troll icon does look remarkably like Drumpf! Just needs an orange makeover and it's perfect.
@Thought about IT
The level of ignorance about the effects of leaving the EU at the time of the last referendum - not least among the most extreme Brexiteers in the government - casts a long shadow over the proceedings.
The level of ignorance about the effects of leaving the EU
at the time of the last referendum even now - not least among the most extreme Brexiteers in the government - casts a long shadow over the proceedings.
You don't understand - the system is to keep voting until we get the correct result, then stop. And of course, 'remain' is the correct result. More votes after that would just be silly.
@AC (should really have been Troll icon, but I'll bite...)
Effect on the UK economy: insignificantly small and unmeasurable.
Unless you are one of the 158,000+ job losses already announced, and we still haven't left! And then of course there is the drop in government tax income as GDP falls steadily for a decade or more.
Interesting list at:
And I don't think any of you are psychopaths.
Let's face it, read just about any of the comments about DIE! DIE! DIE! anything
8K at 120 fps plus sound requires around 500Mbps after compression.
Call me an old Luddite, but I do wonder whether the world will be a substantially better place if we can sit at home watching Loose Women in 8K at 120fps, on our 80" screens, or even some superhero movie with lots of explosions. If you want the big screen experience go to a cinema! If you want incredibly realistic images, step outside your front door!
And, deep down, (and this is my Puritan streak showing) do we really need to be spending hours in front of an idiot-box, of whatever resolution and size, passively absorbing 'entertainment'? There's a whole exciting world out there, with real things to do in it and real people to meet. [I shall now go back to my computer...]
We used to shout 1s and 0s to each other over the telephone - when we were baud.
Ah, happy days...
Oh yes, no reason not to roll out fibre to all, but I'm not convinced about the 'build it and they will come' model for 'needing' 1Gbps to a domestic setting. Even streaming 4K only needs about 25Mbps, so unless you are the old woman living in a shoe with all her children streaming Netflix at the same time...
And, based on practical experience, there are so many bottlenecks in the wider interwebs that the headline figure makes damn all difference when using a browser or similar, once beyond a certain point (perhaps 10-15Mbps per user). It's all the chat back and forth that slows things down. Nominal high speed is great for uploading and downloading large files, or doing cloud backup, but makes damn-all difference for most real-life situations.
And if everyone had 1Gbps and used it, what size would the upstream connection need to handle? And the servers delivering all that content? It's about a lot more than the last mile.
Openreach can claim 300Mbit/s from its cabinets
Not just claim - if you are lucky enough to have had FTTP installed it delivers. I just ran a test and got 292 down/35 up - but I do pay a bit extra for that!
Gigabit would be nice of course, and I have heard tell that Openreach have pushed full-fat fibre to 1GBbps, it's just not been rolled out yet. But, to be honest, I really can't think of many homes, or even businesses that need that sort of thing on general release. Yes, a shopping centre offering free WiFi, or large office, but do we need 1Gbps to every home?
Re: An impressive challenge undertaken
Quite a nice Cathedral. And the new-town bits aren't too bad to live in.
Having spent 13 years there I tend to say that there are a lot of places that are nicer than Peterborough, but there are a lot that are worse!
Of course, I moved away 25 years ago. It may have gone downhill...
Re: Do we need an army?
That is certainly an option. Personally, if I am asked whether I want my country to be governed by potential genocidal nutters, people who would be willing to turn thousands or millions of people into glass, I tend to answer 'No'.
Do we need an army?
A more fundamental question is "Do we need an Army" in the sense of armed forces who, at the end of the day, are there to kill people when the government orders.
Yes, there may be a need for defensive armed forces, and for a bit of UN peace-keeping. But perhaps by moving to a Defence and Emergency Force we may ease some of the problems. Having a body of trained people with equipment ready to handle extreme situations is essential for any country. In the UK we have floods, there could be other problems in the future. Other countries need outside help. It may be that a core of professionals backed up by part-time volunteers ( a la T.A.) is the way to go. But do we, as a country, really need to be able to kill thousands of people on the other side of the world at a moment's notice?
By having a Civil Emergency and Defence force we can make use of their skills all year round. If there isn't an emergency they could be working on public infrastructure projects. The Medics could deliver health programmes, at home or overseas. The techies could be doing something worthwhile.
Our massive and useless aircraft carriers could be re-purposed as floating disaster relief bases, able to travel to areas hit by flood, fire, hurricane, disease or war, and provide an instant base for relief services. And probably won't be such an easy target for a single hostile missile or explosive-laden trawler.
The pay for techies probably wouldn't be as good as in the private sector, but many people are happy to work for the job satisfaction and earning 'enough' rather than buckets of dosh helping bankers become richer by screwing the poor (or whatever). If money was all that mattered to people where would Médecins Sans Frontières be?
<lennon>You may say, I'm a dreamer, but I'm not the only one...</lennon>
Re: Simple answer.
our leaders are about as batshit crazy as it is physically possible to get without being sectioned.
Let's be fair, many of them are way beyond the 'ready to be sectioned' point, but somehow haven't been. Friends in high places?
Re: Problem-solution dichotomy
It gets me that the VERY NEXT ACTION you take is to touch the door.
That bugs me too. What I want is to be able to press a button (or, ideally, think a special phrase) and the vehicle door opens, a long arm extends to where I am, gently cradles me in it, and draws me back into the vehicle, which starts to play my preferred music, delivers me a nice glass of plonk and some nibbles, and autonomously drives off to my destination (which it read in my mind). Now THAT would be a good use of technology.
ancestors who were slaves
Slavery has been widespread throughout human history, whether as outright property (Rome, Berbers, W.Indies and I'm sure China etc) or as serf/villein arrangements. So, given the mixing of genes, I think that probably pretty well all of us have ancestors who were slaves of some sort..
SPG Law said it would cap its fees at a maximum of 35 per cent including VAT.
So, 35% of £500 million = £175 million. It warms the cockles of my heart to hear about lawyers willing to work for a pittance so that their clients don't suffer. And people say rude things about lawyers being money-grubbing scum who aren't fit to line the brimstone pits of hell. This will set the critics right!
<Insert obligatory Shakespeare quote>
Re: Oh dear, a fan
PoE has a lot of plus points. I was looking at Rasp prices a couple of days ago and saw mention of the PoE HAT. I'm only running one 'production' Pi at the moment, that is feeding a TV slide show. I've got the Pi getting updates via ethernet, but I've also got a power supply strapped to the back of the TV. I have another box on the network getting PoE so I could easily add another to the cabinet, which would mean less cabloid mess behind the telly!
The government also pointed to its Data Ethics Framework,
That would be the follow-up to the government Suthics Framework?
Government + Ethics? ERROR: INCONSISTENT DATA. DOES NOT COMPUTE
Re: Too late
It would be handy if they could extend this idea to people wanting you to switch phone/energy supplier.
Re: How did El Reg get your number?
Weird. That's my number too! That explains all those odd calls I've been getting asking me something like "Will God...?"
Regardless of the units, my mind boggles that a machine built by humans, is now over 13,300,000,000 miles from our planet, and is still talking to us. When I was born, no-one had sent a machine more than a few miles from the ground. How far can we. as a species, go?
Just bought an Honor View 10 - seems pretty credible to me!
Neatly side-stepping the usual civil war, for those who really want/need Office or bits thereof, the best deal is the academic licence. It's under £100 for four years, and includes Access. Basically you just need to be a student (sign up for a cheap evening class?) - obviously you wouldn't dream of doing this for business use.
Duct-tape is your friend.
But what exactly IS it?
Bum! Just got an Honor V10 - for £400!
So far it's looking pretty impressive, and something at £279 could be great fun.
This was a replacement for my trusty three-year-old(?) One+ One, which is a bit unwell after several droppings!
Spec is fairly impressive, 6GB/128GB, 6in screen, 2 SIM or SIM+SDCARD, twin camera, fingerprint sensor, usb-C very fast charge (bit of a pain - I have a lot of micro-USB cables and chargers around the house and car - now need to buy adapters!) - and pretty well stock Android 8.0
Honor are definitely one to watch.
It could only pose a 'threat to national security' if the voting machines are actually insecure. It's not as if the hackers are creating the security holes.
So the threat is actually the manufacturer.
I suspect there are many ways to do phishing research. Some good, some bad. But surely one of the things to be done is to occasionally have a confidential one to target senior management just to prove to them that they, with their mekon-brains, can be fooled, and that if they can, then think how easy it will be to fool their idiot menials. And so please can we have some
more money for cyber-security. Ta.
Sometimes these things need to be secret. I remember living on a Vulcan nuclear-bomber base in the early seventies. Every now and then a staff car would turn up unannounced at the gate (any time of day or night, but usually night), would go to the C.O. and shortly after the sirens would go off. No-one but the C.O. knew if it was a drill or if they had four minutes to live. Tends to focus the mind wonderfully. But f*cking terrifying.
Lasting a million years, wiping out life - that sounds like a description of the effects of #Brexit!
its parliament is ineffective compared with Congress;
Are you suggesting that the US Congress is effective? For heaven's sake, they can't even manage to impeach Drumpf!
Re: Wait, what?
Very short report.
1) Of course it's bloody feasible. How do you think the Americans, the Russians and the EU managed it? Pixie-dust?
2) It's an insane waste of money.
[Not bad, that's nearly £4 million a word. Even BoZo doesn't get that much from the Torygraph for his shit]
our government is hiding away in its shelter, with the bombs raining down
It does seem to have a distinct whiff of 'Last Days of Hitler' about it. Sitting in the bunker with the Red Army a mile away, planning for the counter-attack and ultimate victory. How did that turn out?
Re: UK has the resources
UK has several options, not necessarily satellite based only
One of which is, and let us not forget this, is for May to write a short letter saying "The UK withdraws our earlier letter regarding our intention to leave the EU under Article 50 of TEU"
Re: There are limitations to the attacks
Limitations, yes. But it does sound as if, with some extra work, there is the possibility here of something really, really useful - a drone scrambler. And much less legally dodgy than a shotgun.