Re: Emergency call
Yes, it can be turned off.
Dropping your watch won't call the emergency services, since the watch knows it's not attached to you.
10668 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jul 2010
Yep, it's boring, but that's not a bad thing. It's the difficulty in bringing anything radically new to a pocket device (size and power constraints) that forces designers to look at the small details. Polishing away lots of little niggles can lead to a markedly better user experience over time. Or in Apple's case, include long missing g features such as waterproofing, wireless charging and multiple SIM support (this isn't a jibe, Apple have done done things first too, and often find them very well. I don't see value in being first for the sake of being first, but some features were long overdue).
Look at Samsung - very little difference between the S8 and S9 other than the finger print sensor has been made slightly less awkward. Otherwise it's just a slightly better screen, slightly faster processor, slightly this, slightly that. And that's okay.
If you want a crazy radical phone, wait til next year when Samsung and some if their Chinese partners roll out some phones with flexible displays. But the first generation with likely be clunky, poorly supported in software and not proven to be durable. I'll take boring.
Indeed. I know one family member who has never had a car stolen, but she has lost property when she's placed it on top of the car whilst unlocking it and then driven off with items still on the roof.
Pros and cons again.
I'm envious of the cars that detect that you have the key, and will open part of the tailgate if you wave your foot underneath - hands-free access to the vehicle for dumping whatever you're carrying.
Cool, we can get a free ride in a Maclaren then! (Likely followed by a free ride in a Ford Focus with a fluorescent checker pattern on the side).
I saw a Maclaren the other day but my van, despite being white, couldn't keep up so I couldn't follow him to wherever he parked it.
Aston Martins and Teslas are common round here, Maclarens rarer than the very occasional Ferrari or Morgan.
In the book Freakanomics there's an examination of whether golf is a sport or a game. A disabled golfer requested a buggy between shots. The governing body denied it. The sponsorship and sales of golf gear hinge upon it being sold as a sport to occasionally unfit management type men.
Over a CAT network, probably not for games - you'd need high bandwidth between the main CPU and RAM, and the GPU. However, Thunderbolt is fast enough - though you won't get the most out of higher end graphics cards. External Thunderbolt GPU boxes have been around for around six years (Sony Vaio X), but it's only recently with newer versions of Thunderbolt, and support in Mac OS and from some gaming laptop vendors that the concept is gaining traction.
What you can do over a network is stream video and human input, so the game *runs* on your desktop PC but you play it on your laptop or Nvidia Shield tablet - or run the game in your PlayStation 3 and run it in your Xperia phone or PlayStation TV. I've only tried the latter, and it wasn't perfect with video compression artifacts and dropped frames despite both devices being cable connected to the LAN.
You can share a GPU over a network - or rather a machine containing a GPU - for applications where the GPU is fed some numbers and can return a result when it's good a ready - for example, simulating an explosion, ray tracing an architectural scene or, famously, simulating some protein folding. This requires a piece of client software running in the GPU machine, controlled by the host software in the machine you're working on. Bunkspeed Hypershot, used for rendering product images, works this way. You can the master software on a Windows machine to render a SolidWorks model, and it'll use the GPUs and CPUs on every machine (Windows, Mac, Linux) on your network to render the image more quickly.
The internet connection might be paid for by mommy and daddy for Netflicks, just as how in the nineties a £1,000 PC was bought by parents for work but a teenager could play games on it on the side.
Competitive gamers often retire by the age of 30, so a good chunk of their gaming career is spent when they are still in education and without a job.
NVidia making cards for the cloud doesn't stop them making cards for home rigs, especially since the demand from crypto miners has eased off. It's not only Nvidia who are looking at streamed gaming - Microsoft are looking at it too. Previous efforts haven't taken off, as you say, but then fibre broadband is becoming more common today.
Nvidia are talking this up because they are not selling to Sony or Microsoft consoles.
For gamers who aren't as twitchy, sone might prefer to spend a two hours a week playing on sumptuous graphics instead of ten hours a week on moderate graphics for the same money. See the recent demonstrations of real-time ray-traced game footage (can't remember if it was the Unreal engine or Unity or whatever ) using daftly expensive GPU arrays. With the cloud you can rent as much processing grunt as you want.
I can see higher resolution, frame rate and draw-distance giving competitive advantages, but I'm not sure that other GPU-taxing effects such as fancier lighting effects and more leaves on virtual trees effect the actual gameplay. But hey, Doom was fun on 486 hardware, GoldenEye was fun on N64 hardware, Halo was fun on XBOX hardware... if you're focusing your crosshairs on your mate's avatar's head you don't have time to admire the virtual scenery.
Well, I say that, but there's a fascinating article over on Quantamagazine at the moment about how windows and houseplants in real life can act like pinhole cameras can allow inferences as to what is around a corner. Obviously this sort of effect won't be in the first few generations of real-time ray-traced games, but simpler effects such as reflected light might give you a clue that some virtual bastard is hiding around a virtual corner with a virtual shotgun as you're running for the rocket launcher. Again. Bastard.
There's currently enough people living with fibre broadband for LG and Samsung to sell 4K HDR televisions for Netflicks; they don't need to wait for 60% or whatever coverage of the population in order to start shifting units.
Anyway, people living out in the sticks have alternative forms of recreation to video games, such as mountain biking, surfing and drinking cider.
If the aim really is to level the playing field and test the player and not the machine, the obvious solution is for all players to use the same standard hardware... like a PlayStation or Xbox. Neither of which help Nvidia, since they are powered by AMD GPUs.
Even in PX gaming - mouse and keyboard games like DoTA, one would have thought that people watching the tournament would get find it more fun if the competitors had to use a specific gaming PC. I don't know how the sponsorship money works - there's clearly an industry desire to have people spend thousands on machines they only need to catch up with the Joneses.
Small thought: the players need equally low latency to each other. However the spectators could watch a more visually impressive display - realtime ray-traced game footage at the expense of a few more milliseconds.
Do bear in mind that in competitive online gaming, there latency that matters isn't just between the mouse and screen, but between a player in London and a player Madrid or New York. For sure, during 'e-Sports' competitions players are assembled on a Local Area Network, but that isn't how they usually get to practice.
Placing the accelerator in a cellular base station only makes sense if all the players are in the same geographic area.
Some of the new Citizen watches look attractive enough - not as 'sporty chronograph' as their predecessors. Having only hands and dials it can alert you to a notification but not display message contents. Battery life is indefinite in the Eco-drive models. Similar capabilities from Casio, around 18 months between battery changes. Their not particular small - though even finding normal watches at a sensible 38mm is quite hard these days.
> And still pay a premium price for not being able to use the whole screen.
There isn't a premium price - the notch is cut as part of the same process as the whole screen being cut out.
You're not losing a slice of screen, you're actually gaining a couple of 'ears' of screen for the most important icons.
Pareto analysis: I get 80 % of the info I want from 20% of the possible notification icons, namely battery, time, and signal levels in the right, and SMS, WhatsApp and email on the left. Other notifications I'm not fussed about; indeed, I wouldn't want them to be given equal status to the above.
I don't have a notch because Samsung sticks too many sensors up there, but I wouldn't be upset by a phone that did have a notch.
There are also WiFi compact cameras, and even the Mi Fi SD card that retrofits WiFi to other cameras.
You might also consider the Sony QX 100 lens and sensor - though its held its price since being released a few years back. There are Lightening connected cameras for iPhones, and GreyBus cameras for Moto phones.
Other than their zoom lenses, cheaper compact cameras aren't as good (or as easily weatherproofed and ruggedised) as high end phone cameras, so it'd take an RX 100, LX100, G1X or similar camera to see enough difference in image quality to be worth the extra bulk and faff.
Last year's flagships aren't that much more than a refurbished or second hand unit from this year, and you get the reassurance of a warranty. I paid around £500 for a new S8 (about nine months after its first release) on the grounds that it'll last a few years and I'll therefore take good care of it. Waiting for some months after a phone's release also gives a chance for any inherent hardware issues, if any, to be reported on forums.
Its waterproofing has helped with the durability, as has a good case and a toughened glass screen protector. With dismay I watched it bounce down a Welsh ravine last week after it slipped from my butter fingers, but to my relief the case did its job and the phone is still in new condition. I'm going to attach a short length of brightly coloured ribbon to it to help me find it next time I drop it undergrowth (or merely in that dark gap beside a car seat).
OnePlus don't issue VAT invoices*. If you want a OnePlus handset and you want the VAT back for your business it can be best to buy one from the O2 shop and then badger them for a VAT invoice, which they will reluctantly send.
* Apparently for similar reasons outlined here:
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/4/17796118/amazon-ebay-chinese-sellers-tax-fraud-haven
Also, if you buy a phone outright you are covered by the Sales of Goods Act, so should it malfunction you can return it for an immediate refund or new unit - your choice. By contrast, if you get the phone on a bundle it is not 'yours' until the contract reaches term, so the carrier often insists on sending the handset away for a couple of weeks to be repaired.
The adaptive brightnes on some Samsung galaxy phones is very good. I didn't realise til I read up in it that it takes notice of your manual adjustments in various lighting conditions and attempts to replicate them; I merely noticed I wasn't manually adjusting brightness as much as I had on my previous phones. It's not perfect, but it's better than what has gone before.
Now, if only Samsung would allow me to remap that Bixby button to something useful like Flashlight, or Pause audio stream.
The system is looking at a lot of data, some of which it may never have occurred to researchers to examine. You mention warts... well, perhaps it's possible that people who have verrucas are those more likely to have gone to public swimming baths... it's not implausible that these people are fitter and so have smaller risk of heart diseases. But then, the rich might have their own swimming pool, less chance of verrucas, and due to good diet, health education etc might have even lower chance of heart disease. Complex, inter-dependant factors.
Verrucas might be in the data set, private swimming pool ownership - or number of hiking holidays taken - are unlikely to be.
Anyway, you were dubious of the method based upon its conclusion.
Only this morning I heard on the radio that if you smoke and are socially isolated it's 50/50 which is the biggest health hazard. It's a reasonable assumption there is a correlation between one's social engagement and the youthfulness of one's wife.
And I'm deliberately ignoring other health benefits that might come from having a youthful wife, such as a desire to keep oneself fit for her, joining her on country walks, or being taken out dancing, let alone more domestic physical activity.
> What value does AI add to this? It just seems to me an expensive and long winded way of working something out that we already know so you can add "AI" to the name.
Try reading the article again.
There's a data set of patients who have had different factors who have gone to have heart attacks. The correlation isnt clear to the medics since there are many, possibly inter-dependant, variables - i.e it's not obvious, as you think it is. The computer software, using techniques that gave come to be known as AI or Machine Learning, generates various models that fit the data. These models are then tested against more data sets.
Waveguides are the technique Magic Leap (and others) have used in their developer unit, after making a lot of noise a couple of years back about using Fibre Scanning Display. As Karl notes, to achieve a good resolution by spinning a length of optical fibre in a spiral to cover the field of view (akin to how a cathode ray scans back and forth to cover an area) would have said fibre exceeding the sound barrier, if you want a decent refresh rate.
Not really. Magic Leap have been hyping up their technology to gain funding, whereas in this scenario Apple are playing the part of the investor, and one that has the resources to perform due diligence at that.
I had a quick look at www.kguttag.com to see if he'd looked at Akonia, but a search returned no results. Karl Guttag has been a critic of Magic Leap's claims for some years now, and as an expert on HUDs is the guy iFixit consulted on their recent Magic Leap developer headset. His site is worth a browser as he explains the different techniques that could be used to superimpose an image over one's view, and has given hands-on reviews of various AR display companies exhibiting at CES.
It has varied, since there was a HTC phone that was effectively a Nexus and got prompt updates. If this ships with Oreo then likelyhood of frequent and sustained updates is much greater. Over the last few years vendors who were once poor have upped their game in this regard; history isn't the best guide to future update rollouts.
The market is mature. That's largely a good thing for users. Innovation for the sake of it is largely a red herring. Now the big changes are over and done with, designers can concentrate on creating a balanced and refined experience.
Most people want a phone that is pretty good in all areas, not a phone with one standout feature and several niggles.
A Motorola with a battery pack Mod will give you the longer battery life you crave.
Your eMail client can be exempted from Android's power saving policy, though of course the 3/4 G radios will be constantly on - and in areas of mediocre reception this will deplete your battery.
Other Samsung battery saving options include underclock get the CPU and reducing the screen resolution.
Cost of official battery replacement on a high end handset is around 10% if the original cost... the sort of margin that could be lost in buying a handset on a special offer, or buying one brand over another.
If you buy a high end handset that's shipped with Oreo then updates aren't dependant on binary blobs from silicon vendors any more.
Even in the days of swappable batteries and no software updates required, people would often get a new phone every year or two - there's nothing new here. Indeed, the update cycle used to be a year, now two years is the norm.
> If I had the money, I'd buy a few grands worth or Euros right now
The way that markets work is that the current rate of Sterling against Euro is already partially determined by expectations of the Pound losing value in future, so it's not the dead cert investment you think it is. Some people of course have bet on Sterling because they think that it won't drop as much as others think it will, and vice versa.
Last year's £900 phone is eventually discounted to around £500, and at that money there's a strong case for the value. Admittedly the value takes the form of lots of little features that add up (compatability, water proofing, Qi charging, fast processor) and/or a strong feature that is important to some users ( excellent camera, for example).
Of course these features often work in unison.. a good camera with fast processor can only record high frame rate high definition video if the storage is fast enough.
I'd like to have a selection of handsets on the same number - though only one handset active at a time. That way I can leave the house with the handset most appropriate to my day's activities (without the faff of swapping the SIM) just as I choose my footwear. Rugged phone and wellies. Simple phone and trainers. Smart phone and leather soled shoes.
It turns out this is perfectly possible using multiple SIMs - it's available in many European countries but not in the UK.
> It's all about the money, money, money - they don't really give a toss about YOU, just your pocket.
Er, that's kinda the point of a company. At least their desire to make money from the people who have money to spend means Apple are motivated to differentiate themselves from Android on the privacy front.
> My view is the fact that we need such items, as well as USB power bricks for on-the-go recharging purposes is a sad indictment that the initial products themselves are fundamentally flawed.
Everything is flawed, all design and engineering is the process of compromising between flaws. The lifestyles of some users will highlight some flaws over others.
Fit a bigger battery? Phone becomes uncomfortable to hold for longer periods, especially if the user has more delicate arms. And if you fit a battery pack, the end result is much the same.
Underclock the CPU? An option.
Make the screen smaller or duller? Makes some tasks harder.
As it is, the flaw - the compromise - of "top up battery during day if near desk or car, else use battery pack" is one that a lot of people find preferable to the alternative compromises.
- Symbian couldn't easily evolve to support things like GPUs and lots of RAM. iOS, now 64bit only, has so far managed everything that has been asked of it, including running high resolution displays very quickly.
- Nokia might have had some solid models towards their end, but they also produced a huge range of weird phones.
This link is by an engineer walking around CES looking at the AR display technology being touted by various Original Equipment Manufacturers. As such it's a good primer on the state of the art. The problem they are all trying to solve is to overlay an image over the 'real world' - and current tech either reduces the amount of light that reaches your eyes or else introduces sone colour distortion.
https://www.kguttag.com/2018/01/15/ces-2018-part-1-ar-overview/
Yep, the only other headset worth comparing it to is Microsoft's Hololens, for the reasons SkippyBing outlined.
As I understand it, the Hololens doesn't display over as much of the user's field of view as the Magic Leap, nor does it attempt to spoof different focal planes.
MS have taken a more sober approach, targetting industries and sectors such as architecture and plant design that traditionally have benefitted from (and thus spent good money on) visualisation equipment, works stations and CAD software. Hololens is about $3,000 which is acceptable for those sectors.
Indeed, I don't consider it worthwhile drawing parallels between Google Glass and Magic Leap's device. For starters, the chief hurdle to Google Glass's adoption (and thus further development) was social push back - people don't want to be filmed in public places - whereas this Magic Leap isn't designed to be worn out and about in town.
Sidenote: I learnt just the other day that the much lauded GCam algorithms used in the Google Pixel phones came out of Google's Glass project. The weight and size constraints of the Glass headset prevented them from using a bigger camera module, so the engineers had to look at what they could do with software.