Very curious that the company liabilities are pretty much exactly the amount this guy had spent on his two new houses and the grant...But, i'm sure that's just a coincidence...
Posts by Tigra 07
2373 publicly visible posts • joined 20 Jul 2010
Page:
Cold calling director struck off for ‘flagrant’ breach of duties
Camels disqualified from Saudi beauty contest for Botox-enhanced pouts
Electric cars to create new peak hour when they all need a charge
Blockheads changing company names to surf crypto wave get a warning from the SEC
Facebook open-sources object detection work: Watch out, Google CAPTCHA
Re: AC
Yep. Went to an O2 shop for a Nano Sim 2 years back and the pushy staffer kept trying to sell me a tablet. I already own a Nexus 9 and told her this, only to be met with "Nexus 9? Let's see what price." Here, we have those at [[Insert price here]]."
I then had to tell her twice that i wasn't in the market to buy a tablet i already own at a higher price than i'd already paid for it direct from Google. Pushy salespeople are one thing but spare me from the thick ones.
UK competition watchdog: Fox's takeover of Sky 'not in public interest'
Re: Duncan
"As a Linux user since 1996 I well remember the Haloween Documents. You should look them up sometime."
Funny, i really expected that to be related to the "Embrace, Extend, Extinguish" strategy of theirs. It's not something i'd heard of before but it is something i expect from Microsoft of the 90s.
NHS OKs offshoring patient data to cloud providers stateside
America restarts dodgy spying program – just as classified surveillance abuse memo emerges
Apple: The exclusive sales channel for an, er, AI toothbrush
Take a bow, TalkTalk, Post Office, Vodafone! You win most-whinged-about telcos award
Nervy nuke-armed nation fires missile with 5,000km range
"nobody expects it to lob missiles at any of those locations, because it’s a stable and peaceful democracy that generally observes international laws"
Except, maybe towards Pakistan. After all they have been shooting each other's soldiers the last few weeks across the border. Don't expect either side to accept that.
Apple iPhone X: Two weeks in the life of an anxious user
Make Apple, er, America Great Again: iGiant to bring home profits, pay $38bn in repatriation tax
Intellectual Property Office drops, er, patently cool cartoon to teach kids about trademarks
VTech fondleslabs for kids 'still vulnerable' despite sanctions
YouTube turns off cash tap for automatic video nasties
Destroying the city to save the robocar
France to lend Brexit Britain sore souvenir of Norman yoke – the Bayeux Tapestry
UK's Just Eat faces probe after woman tweets chat-up texts from 'delivery guy'
Re: I'm failing to see how this is Just Eat's fault
Hungry House do this too but you still don't expect to be harassed by the restaurant staff and have Just Eat ignore it (especially since they gave your details to the restaurant anyway)..
Appropirate reasons to contact the customer: 1: The driver can't find the address. 2: The chef dropped the pizza so the order will be late.
Inappropriate reasons to contact the customer: 1: "I really like you. When are you ordering again?" 2: "Do you have a boyfriend/girlfriend?"
"This lacked empathy and does not reflect our policies or the way Just Eat would expect something like this to be dealt with"
Just a tip Just Eat: Step 1: Actually get a policy on this so your customers aren't being harassed. Step 2: Actually deal with the issue, rather than just offer a token £5 off the next order and slowly upping it when the customer isn't impressed.
I have no business with Just Eat, but Hungry House support staff are either so lazy, or thick as fuck that they can't even refund the correct amount when there's a cancelled order. Spoke to 3 different staff and they still refunded the wrong amount...
Google sinks cash into more submarine cables, plans more data centres
Butt plugs, mock cocks, late pay and paranoia: The world of Waymo star Anthony Levandowski… by his kids' nanny
A blue butt plug? The guy is a monster...
Seriously, if you're digging into stuff like this to get a reaction then it's clear your case needs to be sensational since you have no hard evidence. Are we expected to believe the guy is a menace to society because this woman alleges he owns sex toys?