Re: Oh the humanity
'Suspended on full pay? How TF is that a punishment?'
It's not. Whilst it might be satisfying if the BBC told him to clear his desk today, they would be paying him off for unfair dismissal tomorrow.
187 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jun 2010
"In my view with the current market share of IE7 and IE8 that means jQuery 2 is unlikely to be of use in a real-world setting for some time."
When you say real-world, what you actually mean is for public web sites. If you RTFRN, that's not what jQuery 2 is intended for as yet. It's largely for apps and other controlled environments.
"Commit the same crime digitally, and it's up to 25 years in the big house?"
That is what happens when you are considering an (alleged) serial offender, and play the stupid game of assuming the maximum sentence for each offence, and that they'll be served consecutively.
And if you are, at least get it right and multiply by the number of counts:
6 x 10 + 1 x 10 + 1 x 3 + 12 x 2 = 97 years.
The thing I loved about eXistenZ was that it made a virtue out of its own weaknesses. They were very sparing of CGI because the game world looks almost exactly like the real one. Most of the time, the plot was a bit rubbish, and the acting poor but that was OK because they were in a video game.
"Microsoft proposed the tablet computer in 2001 which was a good idea, they just didn't have the right idea about technology and how to bring that vision to the masses."
So, only a decade or so after Apple then; and even Apple couldn't get the Newton to sell. Touchscreen driven ARM device - there's just no market for them.
Huawei came in for a pasting at Defcon 2012 because their equipment was so vulnerable. Have a look at the presentations before you make up your mind that it's all just US protectionism.
I don't find it difficult to believe that a Chinese firm hasn't really caught up with the 21st century, and realized that hackers are going to take their code apart and document vulnerabilities whether they like it or not. It took many US firms decades to learn that lesson; I doubt it will take them that long.
As AndyC says it's ALARP not ALARA, and it's fundamental to UK Health and Safety law, and the idea that radiation is treated differently from other hazards in law is untrue.
"The concept of “reasonably practicable” lies at the heart of the British health and safety system." http://www.hse.gov.uk/risk/theory/alarpglance.htm
"Its use of 512-bit keys, for instance, stand in stark contrast to the minimum requirement that keys contain twice that length."
And really, if you're still using 1024 bits, you really shouldn't be any more.
"Why is Entrust, along with all of the other publicly trusted certification authorities, moving to 2048-bit RSA keys [by the end of 2010]?" http://www.entrust.net/knowledge-base/technote.cfm?tn=7710
I think that's just wrong. The problem is that not all browsers support TLS 1.1 ; according to SANS Chrome, Firefox and Safari lacked support at the time of writing.
(http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=11629).
Saying it's not hard to negotiate, or display a warning is true but putting the cart before the horse.
Research institutes are always 'top-secret labs' to hacks. Whilst it may very well be true that there is some highly classified research going on in some corner of the lab, the way you deal with it is to have proper controls between the classified and non-classified parts. Like a big air gap, razor wire, killer bees....
It's national research facilities like, for example, the National Supercomputer Centre (which is located there) that the Internet was made for.
The arguments used in court can be arcane, particularly when the case is about a narrow technical interpretation. However, sometimes the judgements are about broader principles.
For example, I offer the summary of R v Chaytor and others: http://www.supremecourt.gov.uk/docs/UKSC_2010_0195_ps.pdf where at issue is the limits of parliamentary privilege provided by the Bill of Rights.
"There's something wrong with the law when the guy gets fined £5000 and 250 hours community service, when its pretty likely he would have got off with less for a serious physical assault."
This is for ten separate offences. I take the point that the assault case guy seemed to get off lightly but that doesn't seem to me to be a good reason to go easy on a serial fraudster.