Re: Not quite
Bits in the page table entries, mostly. Whilst x64 has enough modes, you can't have all the traditional VMS memory protection masks like Kernel-Write, Exec-Read. It's not a deal breaker but it needs some work.
187 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jun 2010
Tesco and Unilever are big enough to look after themselves, and I'm sure they will find some settlement that leaves a reasonable margin for both parties. It's the small suppliers that are going to feel the squeeze.
If the point of JEA is that you can give operators limited access to carry out administrative tasks, then it's not really fit for purpose if you have a BOFH. Whether that is a big deal or not depends on important 'least privilege' is for you. I would think that only a small minority of organisations are going to be able to handle malicious insiders at all well.
"The USA doesn't have to show any solid evidence for wanting an extradition - whereas the UK has to quote chapter and verse (and the US generally refuses to extradite one of their citizens to the UK anyway)."
The first part is debatable: some people believe the treaty is lopsided but an official review said otherwise. The second part is complete nonsense: the US has never refused an extradition to the UK under the Act.
Sigh, it's all there in the article with links and everything; he had the restrictions imposed after an earlier conviction. SOPOs can be a bit heavy handed at times - it's hard to say in this case without knowing the unpleasant details of the original offence. Some restrictions on your liberty as a convicted sex offender aren't unreasonable in general though.
"Aren't the other operating systems effectively even weaker against this because they haven't implemented RFC5961 at all?"
Sadly, not. The problem is that since the total number of challenges is rate limited, an attacker can deduce the number of challenges sent on attempts to spoof valid connections. So instead of having to guess port number tuples, the attacked system will now tell you.
In order to make blind guessing less effective, we will now let you know when you are getting close. Sadly, a small flaw in an attempt at hardening has made things worse.
"As Moedas said: "As long as the UK is a member of the European Union, EU law continues to apply and the UK retains all rights and obligations of a member state." My guess would be that Moedas regards funding as a privilege and not a right."
That is somewhat unfair, I think. Institutions deciding they don't want to make a joint application with a British partner is not something you can legislate for. You can only treat the bids you receive equally.
Some people seem to have no sense of proportion; any large codebase that 's been around for a while will have bugs that are a) minor and b) disproportionately hard to fix. And some of the ciomments are classic (paraphrasing slightly).
"What if the user doesn't want people messing with the UI".
"We are web designers, we don't care what the user wants."
When the revolution comes, these people will be first against the wall. Shooting them would be too good - I'll just paint it lime green with purple spots.
Not as absurd the idea that nobody working in a large organization ever stored a file locally on a laptop's hard drive. It happens all the time.
It goes without saying that there shouldn't be anything that needs long term storage solely on a hard drive. However, there might be some interesting bits of work-in-progress stored locally, that might be of use to a lawyer fishing for something.
'I strongly suspect that the "grossly expensive" applied to land with planning permission is a function of the CIL element, which is little more than a mandatory bribe to the local authority.'
1. It's only been around since 2008, and land prices haven't changed much since then. It's not a huge amount compared to the value of the land.
2. In any case, it would be a cost the prospective developers have to pay, so it would tend to reduce the land value.
He held a knife to someone's neck, but he may as well have left it hidden in his pocket for all the difference it made to the sentence - "two attempted robberies and possession of a blade".
This appears to be an something of an exaggerration. His lawyer said: “Tellers are behind reinforced bullet-proof glass. Unless they take leave of their senses in offering the money, it is not going to work." Similar remarks at the Kent police site: http://www.kent.police.uk/news/latest_news/150909_neaverson_sen.html
"I am surprised that the judge allowed that level of jury-rigging"
<Shrug>
I always take things that one of the parties or their lawyer's claims with a healthy dose of skepticism, particularly when they are on the losing side. It's rather like listening to a post match interview without having seen the game.
"I disabled RC4 in our shipping product two months ago (along with export ciphers and SSL2/3 and the original TLS 1.0). 2016 is still way too slow"
So it took you around two years after people first proposed dropping support for RC4 to disable it yourself but another few months is way too slow?
I'm not sure it is 'spare', as such. More likely, they have designed their network around having a /8. I guess they could renumber everything to a private range and sell it off. However, I don't see many of the firms that have /8s jumping to cash in, so it's probably not as easy or as profitable as it might first appear.
Knowing DWP, they'll probably make less on the sale as they spend on consultants.
https://governmenttechnology.blog.gov.uk/2015/02/19/freeing-up-unused-ip-addresses/
Am I too cynical if I assume that he means "from the moment he was caught"?
Well, perhaps. It might be true that he was tempted by access to a whole pile of money, and regretted it. It's a fairly normal human reaction. It's not much of a defence though, especially from someone in law enforcement.
OTOH, what Carl Force is accused of is a whole other level of wrong and if proved, deserves serious time.
They are just medium size towns of no particular distinction - imagine 'The Office' being set there and you'll get the general idea. Probably quite similar to the French town in the story (which is why they are twinned) but the grass is always greener, no?
@DavCrav Regretting that he's going to be spending the next 20 years or more in prison isn't the same thing as remorse. Even in his plea bargain letter he is trying to argue that he was just providing a market, and it wasn't really his fault how people chose to use it. So, lack of responsibility and remorse. Whether true or not, *really* not the right thing to say.
Having said that, I'm not convinced that life without the possibility of parole is an appropriate sentence in any case, certainly not ths one. However, the US has a harsh criminal justice system, and his sentence isn't out of line with it.
@Indolent Wretch - Your argument is mainly just wishful thinking. You don't want APIs to be copyrightable, on which point most people would agree. That doesn't necessarily make it so, though.
I don't find the idea that API design isn't a creative process entirely convincing. I don't know about you but I reckon I can tell a badly designed API from a good one.
"Wonder how long was left on his sentence and why he turned himself in?"
He hasn't been sentenced yet, he was awaiting trial. They've posted the story now, because he's just now been convicted (he pleaded guilty) and there is no possibility of prejudicing a trial. That is the conventional time to do a full press report in the UK.
And it was the 10th March 2014 that he originally escaped.
The tender is linked in the earler Reg article. £700M is the traditional journalese maximum number, the tender is for 50-700M. And presumably the bid is specified in £/GB etc, and how much it's actually going to cost depends on the takeup. Since we have no idea what the figures in the bid are, there isn't really any basis to make a comparison.
"I've commented on this 'smartphone' several times at several forums. This is because I still find difficult to believe the extreme precision with which they forecasted a technology that was ~35 years in their future."
I'm always impressed by Bradbury, who in 1953 managed to predict that the main use of mobile phones would be to annoy people on public transport.