Re: dont know
Make you never surf the web either, that's where they get most of the data.
451 publicly visible posts • joined 21 Jun 2010
I'm not sure that argument holds water. Allowing people with really unpopular opinions speak their mind generally doesn't end up with them gaining a lot of support, just a lot of derision and mocking. Regardless of how hateful their message is, letting them talk about it makes it easier to combat.
I think you've missed the point of Mozilla entirely. They're an open-source project that doesn't get any funding from users. So therefore, they don't care what users think. They do what they want, similar to many other open source projects. GIMP comes to mind particularly, because it's had a terrible user interface for years, but instead of fixing it the team just constantly talks about how they think it's better than any other option, years and years after everyone else ditched floating palettes, they're still there in GIMP.
To distill this down, Mozilla doesn't care what you think. If you don't like it switch browsers.
Nah, every browser maker is dropping NPAPI because it's an in-process binary specification and they want to go with a HTML-Javascript implementation that's easier to sandbox and integrate with their browsers. Everything being Javascript (or HTML5 as hipsters like to call the new ECMAScript versions) is much simpler for browser makers and web developers. This is helpful, particularly for security. NPAPI leaves security in the hands of 3rd party plugin developers and there have been many instances of those developers dropping the ball, particularly Adobe with Flash and Reader plugins.
"Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsom killed that proposal out of fear that upsetting Silicon Valley billionaires would damage his chances to win the Californian governorship in 2018"
This corrupt politician should be forced to resign immediately. The American voter's corruption tolerance is now so high their scumbags think they can get away with anything. Sadly I think that might be true.
This is exactly the sort of thing that increases the uptake in ad blocking technologies. The more intrusive the advertising methods, the more people block. This is a circular problem and advertisers are just making it worse. Blocking ads is much more simple than blocking ad blockers, so I'm guessing that ad supported publications are going away, unless they can come up with another business model or convince their readers not to block their ads.
"hopes to raise as much as $20m through an initial coin offering that aims to sell 100m worth of BitCoen digital tokens to investors"
For anyone not familiar with crypocurrency, this is what is generally referred to as a premining scam. Nothing supports this valuation and you're unlikely to see a return on investment. Anyone can just launch a crypocurrency and if they're already doing things like this you can't trust these developers at all.
I doubt it, 99.9% of people don't have a problem with Windows 10. And don't bother replying saying how much you hate Windows 10, I'm fully aware that half the people who don't like Windows 10 are members here.
P.S. Surface Pro is totally capable of running Linux, but you'd be crazy trying to run Windows 7 on it. The touchscreen support is terrible.
The work MacBook Air I had for about 4 years was constantly receiving firmware updates. They come through the app store. Very convenient, why would you not want firmware updates? Every laptop I've ever bought has needed nearly constant updates (except the Alienware m14x R2, which only had 6 ever). The Dell XPS 15 I currently own is the worst. I think the firmware gets updated at least once a month. Windows update is starting to distribute firmware now too, but it seems significantly behind the manufacturer, at least for my Dell.
How is that different from Mac OS? You have to "jailbreak" that too, by installing bootcamp and a copy of Windows, otherwise you're severely limited in software choice. I know I'm being a bit of a jerk here, but it's a fairly similar situation if you look at the situation as it sits today, totally ignoring the history of the personal computer.
I don't think so. They can't really get away with that at this point. I think it's an attempt to get most people (basically, all the not us type people) on to Windows 10 S, to increase the popularity of the store. If that happens we'll have to use the store too and Microsoft will have succeeded in becoming the central hub of the Windows software ecosystem like they want.
Even saying that, I don't think this will work.
Then they'll be paying that $50 upgrade fee won't they. What Microsoft is doing is scummy, but it's not like they have to chuck the entire thing in the bin because it can't be upgraded to Windows 10 Pro (in under 2 minutes).
Disabling it has been available for years. Microsoft is even disabling SMB1 server on new Windows 10 installs right now.
If you put the onus on software companies to patch bugs that affect software in ways it was never designed to be used you'd quickly find software prices would skyrocket to insane levels, it's not economically feasible. And if forced to "fix" this problem I'm totally convinced that Microsoft would just release a patch that disables SMB1. It may not even be possible to fix without modifying the protocol enough that it wouldn't be compatible with the current implementation, and then what point would there be in fixing it to create SMB v1.1, might as well just use SMB 2 or 3.
You can't protect idiots from themselves no matter how hard you try. If you have an SMBv1 share exposed to the internet they can brute force the password fairly easily even without a flaw. No one should ever have any SMB shares on the Internet.
The cost effective solution would be to disable SMB sharing on effected versions of Windows, I imagine you wouldn't like Microsoft doing that unilaterally either.
I've actually used the "Windows Subsystem for Linux", in insider builds, for a while. And it's much more useful than this article implies. You can run pretty much any Linux software you want, provided it doesn't need hardware-accelerated X. You install a Windows X server and your application windows just show up like normal in your Windows session, and the terminal works exactly like it does on a Linux machine.
It's great for software devs, although I can't really see why anyone else would need it because you can do most things you'd want to on a server with native windows apps and scripting (PowerShell is a totally usable solution now) and Windows beats Linux handily for productivity apps and gaming.
To tell you the truth, I'd prefer a "Windows Subsystem for Linux" (Wine is not compatible enough, WSL is amazingly compatible), but at least this lets me use both OSs at the same time without the virtualization overhead.
And as for files not being available across systems, that's really not important at all. You can just set up network shares and then magically everything is shared. Wow, so hard.
Wow, that PGS thing looks like a real cut and dried scam. No prototype, check. Ridiculously low price, check. Unlikely claims, check. Company based in country where it is functionally impossible for foreigners to win court cases, check. Taking cash directly to avoid KickStarter rules, checkedy check.
In Canada, we call what Americans call "Canadian Bacon" garbage. I don't know how Americans took the idea of good back bacon, then threw it out and started selling slightly fried slices of ham and calling it "Canadian Bacon". Sacrilegious.
Obviously I'm not voting on the Full British thing as I'm not qualified.
Welcome to the 2000's IT people. Software developers like me have had to get used to continuous delivery already, at my company we put out releases every 2 months (and bug fixes as necessary). Keeping the same OS for 5+ years may have been ok in the 1980s, but in today's always-connected world people demand constant updates.
Now for old guard whinging:
I personally don't care if the microSD port is hard to access, as long as it's there. I'd rather buy one decent-sized card and leave it in there until I feel like I need more space than to swap cards all the time. A dual-sim card is pretty useless in the western world. OnePlus should have doubled up the functionality with a micro SD slot. My current Moto X Play is like that. The MicroSD card is on the bottom of the sim holder.
This is the perfect solution, I personally don't use paint anymore so I like the option to not have it installed if I don't want. I've already made use of the option to remove Windows Media Player and Internet Explorer from Windows 10. It would be nice to see Microsoft unbundle more of the software that ships with Windows so we can remove it if we want.
I know a lot of people have been talking about Notepad too, which I also don't really use (NotePad++ FTW). But I think a basic text editor should be bundled with the OS because you occasionally need it to get yourself out of situations with corrupted config files. I suppose I'd be ok if it was a store package, as long as it was installed by default. Microsoft also needs to work on the store, I never have issues installing anything from Google Play on my phone, but the Windows Store is always having install issues and I barely ever use it.
P.S. I noticed a lot of people haven't noticed that Microsoft has already removed calc.exe, the current one is just a launcher for the WinRT calculator app. As such it doesn't work if you corrupt your WinRT subsystem, as are parts of the start menu.
Is there really a big demand for this? I don't think Atari has a lot of nostalgia left to support this.
As for timeline, it doesn't take too long to fabricate a case for a stock circuit board, load it up with ROMs, Linux and a 2600 emulator. I could knock out a "working prototype" of this product myself in a day. A Raspberry Pi could do it easily and they're cheap as chips.
My cyncism for defunct brands revived by marketers apparently knows no bounds.
If you want a local or self-managed vault, an open-source product like KeePass is the only logical option at this point. It's not a matter of if but when will any commercial password locker maker decide that that < 1% of users that don't use their cloud service aren't worth supporting anymore. Companies aren't charities, so they're not going to keep supporting unpopular features, when the other option is so profitable.
Use TypeScript? I know, I know, it's not the same thing as static typing built into the language. All of the static typing solutions I've looked at for JS aren't very good, but I don't think Javascript's design lends itself to static typing. We'd probably be better off with a new scripting language... and then we get to the problem of people not wanting to change.
This is definitely the biggest debate in Web development right now... glad I'm not the one who has to decided where we're going.
Form factor is an issue, my laptop can't accommodate anything more than one m.2 drive for storage. This isn't a real issue for me because I have USB drives, a NAS box and a desktop computer. But if you want a lot of storage in a thin and light laptop, NAND density is the only real solution.