It's lucky surnames are unique
Oh wait. What happens when two famous people have the same name?
6848 publicly visible posts • joined 28 May 2010
You very rarely see people using screens above 1600x1200 (or widescreen equivalent) even on 24" PC screens they work on all day. On a 10" screen, 2400x1568 is pointless.
There's a reason PCs didn't continue scaling resolutions ever higher on monitors as graphics chips made this possible - it's unnecessary.
I don't think many see WHSmith as synonymous with foreign-language texts. Outside the English speaking world, I don't doubt there are more opportunities - but in the UK itself I doubt it. We know the vast majority don't care about lock-in, only price, UX and convenience. Amazon have gone the opposite route from Apple with their pre-Fire devices and got the same result - a VERY slick product that non-techies buy in their droves.
Serious tinfoil hat loon. Some of his principles are well and good, but where he goes with them is stupid. Not to mention that the moment he starts describing non-OSS as "evil"...
Not sure if her does more harm or good to OSS' cause these days. Seems to be edging more and more to become a Westboro-style caricature of himself.
On OSX, Chrome has replaced Safari as my default browser - never tried Opera - due to the fact it is faster and shares my bookmarks/data across all my PCS.
I gave up on FF ages ago - it is by far the clunkiest browser - even IE8 seems more responsive - on my PCs. On my main development PC, I permanently have Chrome open on one monitor and IE9 on the right... Chrome has been my main browser for a year or more and I just updated to IE9 to test it, but was pleasantly surprised how good it is. I don't see serious differences in terms of usability or general slickness, the lack of addons is annoying but I don't spend most of my time on sites with Flash-crammed sites anyway.
I'd be interested to know how things vary between XP and Vista/W7 - the latter have the option to use a decent IE browser so those platforms there must be a proportion of discerning, educated users who _choose_ IE9 as their preferred browser. Maybe only a small proportion, but with IE9 (and 10) the decision to install another browser is less compelling, simply because 9 is far better than 7 or 8.
MS don't need a better browser than FF/Chrome to remain #1, just one that is close enough most people can't see the point changing.
Price: it doesn't seem more expensive than competing high-end HTC, Samsung phones running Android or WP7.
Antenna: saying the old model had a bad one therefore you shouldn't buy the new one is silly. Most of the points are fine but I have to theorise the author was stretching for 10 points and ran out at 7 or 8.
They've been working for years, with presumably a large team in place. I doubt many of us software developers would agree to pay back an entire project budget either in similar circumstances, it would mean going bust.
Considering a large part of the blame has to rest on the NHS/government to begin with, getting such a large part back is a good achievement.
You are entirely correct that self-learning with nobody to review your work can lead to ingrained, horrendous habits... BUT computer science courses are not about teaching students how to program - that's typically seen as too vocational.
The point I'll make is that someone with a passion for programming who spends their free time doing it for sheer pleasure, is probably preferable to someone who has never done any coding before university and expects to be taught it all.
The ideal combination is someone who has a lot of experience from hobby coding, and THEN goes to university to learn the theory side and learn better habits while they are still young enough to adapt.
Back then, browsers weren't all magical like now. IE6's proprietary features were pretty neat and let you do cool stuff which managers probably demanded so they could "have apps in the browser".
I get this kind of demand for 3D graphics - everything has to be "in the browser" these days regardless if it makes any sense.
Telling giant companies "just upgrade" is a huge ask for the obvious reasons already mentioned. But having them stick with IE6 for existing apps means new apps will likely also require or be limited to what IE6 offers.
This kind of solution (also the Chrome/FF tools) lets you develop new apps for modern environments and upgrade old ones as convenient, rather than being an all-or-nothing decision.
You'd think the company would market to China though.
Some people seem so very obsessed with forcing privacy upon me. They turn it into some huge idealistic idol and tell us anyone is EVIL who wants to use our data to make money.
I'd trade that privacy for better service, but the privacy zealots seem hell-bent on taking away that freedom to choose.