How is an AI legally a lawyer?
Does it pass bar? How can it be sanctioned for misconduct?
530 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2010
At least we get told about the Gov-forced limitations in China and so on. The PRISM surveillance in USA was secret:
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/what-prism-who-edward-snowden-nsa-spying-476785
"Prism is a Us government-run programme for accessing vast swathes of data from some of the world's biggest and most powerful technology companies, such as Apple and Google... Prism is a programme giving NSA operatives direct access to the servers of these companies, giving them unfettered access to personal information of billions of people around the globe."
There seems to be an underlying presumption that customers will come in droves to buy whatever ICs these new UK startups come up with. Brexit doesn't help with selling to EU, which has NXP and ST anyway, the US has consolidated to TI-ADI-Microchip. Since UK industry is mil-aero, needs to be hi-rel and rad-hard products, which is a high ASP but tiny volume market.
So if the PDF has security settings disallowing editing, commenting etc... will FF still allow it? Breaking the security PW is easy - Elcomsoft Advanced PDF Password Recovery (APDFPR) does it in a fraction of a second. Not so trivial to break a PW needed to open a PDF, mind you...
This is to provide a haven in UK for FB when IRL is finally forced to apply GDPR.
Then there will be 10 years in the courts with FB & UK arguing that the new UK data laws offer adequacy with GDPR when the whole point of the new UK data laws is to allow the likes of FB to pillage data just like in the US.
How do Ring know which are the fun videos to broadcast after getting permission?
They trawl through ALL OF THEM, initially automated, then people look at the shortlisted ones to finalise selections, all without explicit permission.
Exactly.
I find it unbelievable that a company as large as Zoom couldn't even patch an externally disclosed flaw properly on the first release. Doesn't the word 'release' have any meaning in terms of testing and quality to Zoom?
Missing an exploit, sure, it happens. But the initial flawed patch release should entail a consequence to the senior manager who signed off the release.
It's pretty clear that a word has been chosen that can be argued to mean something later that is not what we understand it to mean now.
That the mouthpieces confused the two is interesting... which one was the word that Legal told 'em to use?