Re: Tie me down
"Wearing a tie...insults my religious beliefs"
Not a Mormon then?
25368 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
"having VR headsets strapped to their faces"
The latest ones seem to be much, much smaller nowadays, more like wearing a pair of slightly larger sunglasses and from the one I saw demoed on The Gadget Show the other week, quite impressive. But for gaming while at home, probably sitting down. On the other hand, it's rare to see anything on The Gadget Show that they are critical of other than in the comparison tests. They get all excited by IoT stuff and never mention the downsides.
I could see the point of 3D tours, but more in the gaming fashion on the computer screen rather than at the sales agents office with goggles on and them trying to push the sale. It could be a good way to winnow the wheat from the chaff and only spend time physically looking at the properties you are most interested in. After al, the static photos can and often are, used to hide the things that might put you off. I'd think the sales agents would be all for only showing around those people most likely to buy and not those who turn up, see the tiny back garden and walk away.
I see this "photo hiding reality" thing all the time when looking for holiday cottage lets. Anything that only shows the outside in a tight shot is hiding the fact it's in somones back garden or the middle of a housing estate, which is NOT what I'm looking for :-)
And yet, physical supermarkets seem to have it just about right. Occasional relocations of stock items, maybe one every year or two, prime sellers at eye level, and "special offers" sometimes in unusual places to trigger impulse buys. Some are looking at Bluetooth tracking to try to see what individuals are doing, which products they pick and put back, how long they stand in certain parts of the shop etc, but I bet they are not finding much use for the data on individuals and are only ever using the aggregated data to re-arrange store layouts and product placement. IME, it's a better shopping experience than online shopping because I don't get bombarded with "other people also bought" and other push advertising.
"so the enjoyment of browsing the shelves for Iain Banks and finding an interesting-looking book by a different author"
I'm in two minds over the sorting of the books on the shelves. Our local library, for as long as I can remember, used the general alphabetical sorting for most books, but also had some specific genre sections such as crime, SF&F etc. The problem with SF&F, despite the SF and the F being different genres, is there is also a lot of cross-over between the two and neither are especially large genres so get lumped together. Same happens with general Crime novels and the more distinct Murder/Mystery sub-genre.
As for the quote above, "finding an interesting-looking book" is marketing in reality. What attracted you to it? The colours? Authors name? Book title? There's really not much to see on the spine to make a book seem attractive unless there's something obvious related to an existing interest. I suspect if all books were mandated to be green of red "leather" bound and use the same typeface for gold leaf printed authors name and title, you'd rarely spot an "interesting-looking book". :-)
I looked on with admiration as speech recognition was coming along. I even played with it a little, on a simplistic level, on 8-bit Z80 based systems. Then the likes of Google came along and moved all the processing into "the cloud" where no one knows who has access to everything you say. That spoiled it for me. I'd much rather have a simpler interface that works locally, and the power of even a mobile phone should allow that to some extent. I think the problem is, as you say, lazy users. No one wants to learn the limited vocabulary of a locally based system and train it to their voice and peculiarities. They just want it to work with any voice, any language, any accent, right out of the box.
I never give a maximum score on any of these sorts of scales because perfection or "above and beyond service" is incredibly rare and the only time anyone deserves full marks. As far as I'm concerned, a middle ranking is "doing your job as expected". Systems which have scales of only 3 or 5 stars means most vendors should be averaging 2 or 3 stars.
On the other hand, I've seen plenty of manipulative scales ranging from "good" to "excellent" with no options for anything less than "good". Rankings only offering 3 scale points are probably the most insidious since the only real options of "poor", "average", "excellent" and they complain if you give anything other than "excellent".
I did one recently which had a scale of 1-9. I gave 5-7 for most of the items and then was informed later that anything below 7 was considered "poor" despite my being honest in my belief that I was giving quite good scores to the questions asked. This was supposed to be an "open, transparent and anonymous" corporate-wide survey, yet they did not make clear how the scoring worked befoirehand.
Yeah, they are constantly pushing XBox and/or XBoxLive accounts in these sort of situations for some weird and only logical to them marketing reasons. Considering the installed base of Windows users, I would think Xbox owners/account users are a tiny minority in the overall scheme of things. Likewise, why is something as niche as XBox getting apps/shortcuts and actual running services installed in a default Windows install?
"I may try it on one of my big computers and actually read the documentation."
That;s actually, possibly intentionally, quite an endorsement. You installed it and successfully played with it in a non-optimal situation with no instruction and it mostly worked. I look forward to your comments when you've read the user guide and have a more optimal PC or laptop to try it on :-)
"customers from the following states are eligible to receive compensation: California, Florida, Illinois, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, and Washington."
And if you live anywhere else, good luck going through the entire case all over again, since it never got to court and doesn't apply to you. Clearly Apple decided it's much cheaper to pay out $50m now while kicking the can down the road for every other jurisdiction in the hope others will fail to organise or just feel it's not worth 4 more years for something they have already written off as "lost" anyway.
The continual growth model is forced on them by the way the stock market works. Grow or die. And don't just grow. Grow based on stock market expectations. Grow slowly, or worse, level off while remaining a profitable and successful business, and you will die on the stock market. Borrowing cost will skyrocket and the fair-weather shareholders will sell up in droves.
We frequently see reports here on El Reg of tech company share prices falling because they didn't achieve the n% growth predicted by the "anal-ysts" and instead grew by some slightly smaller amount.
Apart from foldable phones, which have their own issues (I'd quite like one actually), I'm not sure what is even in the pipeline in terms of revolutionary new technology. There's often signs of Things To Come in the tech press, but nothing I'm seeing so far that would do much, if anything for the mobile phone.
I can imagine plenty of SF-like changes/options/upgrade that might be considered revolutionary, but nothing actually feasible of possible yet :-)
Yeah, I was thinking that it must be pretty natural the world over the realise the babies make higher frequency sounds than adults, so making similar sounds back at them is more likely what they will understand. Likewise, speaking or singing to them, the adults realise that a baby is not going to understand complex sounds and so simplify them. It's almost, but maybe not quite, a No Shit Sherlock moment. Like a lot of "common knowledge" sometimes it takes someone to go, "Hey, is this really true? Should be look into it and test for it?"
I wonder what "disabled" means? If you don't have a registered disability, but some other reasons for taking longer to get in the car, such as a leg in a plaster cast, a temporary disability, or something more long term, like getting quite old and infirm. Or one of the "non-visible" disabilities or conditions that may not be "registered" with "authorities". Do they get to fill out waiver forms too? Or does this only apply to people on some sort of "list". Will Uber accept a waiver based on the customers own description?
"So why do we need a years-long investigation followed by a delay followed by more investigations to establish this?"
Because no matter how slam dunk it may appear, just because a politician or even a Government say something is illegal doesn't necessarily mean it is, or if it is, by how much it is illegal. Government seem to be expert at only one thing. Making fuzzy grey laws with lots of loopholes.
...that the US doesn't already have a constellation up there for this very purpose. Of course, maybe they have, but they can no longer put the upgrade through the "black ops" budget and, of course, everyone knows this is possible now so no need to keep it secret this time around so potentially cheaper if they can go open ten der for the cheapest bidder :-)
As of November last year, the UK owns 24 F35Bs, 3 of which are stationed in the US for training. That was the first link I found. On the other hand, facetious or not, yeah, there were none when the first carrier was launched, which was pretty embarrassing both for the UK and the US.
I don't know how standard this is but when the "full fleet" of 74 is reached, it's expected that 20% will be in maintenance at any one time. That sounds like a lot to me.
Old and outdated "news".
Sep '21
"Until now, the ships have embarked the fifth-generation jets but never have the two 65,000-tonne behemoths launched the fighters from their flight decks at the same time.
That’s now changed with HMS Prince of Wales exercising with the RAF’s 207 Squadron in waters close to the UK, while, on the other side of the world, HMS Queen Elizabeth carries out flying operations over the Pacific with her jets from 617 Squadron and VMFA-211 of the US Marine Corps."
He's quite rightly pointing out how much more value for money it could have been had it been on time and on budget. He's also saying it's most likely *still* value for money even 15 years late and 20x over budget and suggesting that the next one, if on time and on budget, might be so much better both technically and value for money. While thinking on this and a likely successor, remember that JWST was in the first discussion phases before Hubble was even launched. That means the JWST successor is probably being discussed right now.
"I'm afraid MrsAC deals with this simply by having 80,000 emails in her in box, although to be fair, the search function in the latest Outlook is actually getting quite good!"
It is better than it used to be, but why does it list the "Top 3 Results" then below that, list all the results, including the same Top 3 Results in the top 3 positions? And it never has my result in the Top 3 Results even though every search term I entered is definitely in the one I'm looking for? It seems the "Top 3 Results" are just the most recent emails which happen to match the criteria.
Especially when Windows "helpfully" show only part of the path with elipses, the amount it shows varying by which application of file manager you are using to dig down with because the address bar isn't allowed to scale with the content in case it messes up the pretty layout of tool icons.
"A relative lives in Belgium: Her friend's husband died and mere hours later the friend's JOINT account with her spouse was frozen. She could not get access to the account for months."
I can sort of see the point. What if your friend cleared out the account and deceased will declared that his share was meant to go to someone else? A lot can depend on local law, eg does the spouse get everything by default, over-riding any will by the deceased or does the deceased's will over-ride everything, potentially leaving the surviving spouse penniless?
"Still not all of the mail stopped, and even when we learned of his demise a few years ago and started labeling the return mail with "ADDRESSEE DECEASED" in big bold letters two or three trade magazines just kept going."
Probably because a 3rd party mail distribution company is sending the stuff out and the returns just go straight in the bin. They don't care at all whether the items even get delivered. They only get paid for sending them. If they acted on even the genuine "not at this address" or "addressee deceased", that would affect their bottom line.
I think read somewhere, fairly sure in a comment in these very forums, the power of attorney expires on death.
Just checked and "The lasting power of attorney (LPA) ends when the donor dies. You must report the death of a donor to the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG).
"the final decision is made at a level above one that actually understands what is needed."
Yes, that was my first thought on this matter too. How much IT buyers "remorse" is related to decisions made by the C-Suite and foisted on IT rather than being IT-led? Are Gartner measuring remorse or dissatisfaction? I suspect the latter, since the C-Suite are the Gartner customers and the IT teams are the people being polled.
"It won't raise wages. Corporations report record profits in tune of billions - there is plenty of idle money that can be spent on wages and also reduce organisations' Corporation Tax liability as a bonus"
That's certainly a part of it, at least with large companies trying to keep the dividend payouts and share prices up to "normal" levels. On the other hand, some of the biggest share holders are the people managing and paying out our pensions.
"Oddly the cpu was a NEC V20 or V30 which supposedly could run 8080 code (and CP/M-80?) natively."
It did. I can confirm. I upgraded a Tandy 1000A by replacing the 8088 with a V20 because it was 10% more efficient at the same clock speed and came with the extra benefit of running CP/M stuff.