Re: Here is data everyone, including Musk, has been looking for
I thought he was just a fan of the show :-)
(either or both versions)
25376 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
Worse, I parked at a university last year and they ONLY have pay by phone and pay by app. BOTH have a surcharge so it's actually impossible to pay the advertised parking charge without paying one or other (different!) surcharges. I'm sure they must be breaking some law or other with that.
I was working with a guy just the other day. He's showing me a procedure on his laptop, He's bashing away at the touchpad for clicks and complaining about how poor it is. So after a demo, he lets me have a go. Moving the mouse and a quick tap on the touch pad for click worked perfectly for me every time. Also, as is common on many modern touchpads, it's actually what some call a clickpad in that the bottom left/right corners sit on switches. I still have no clue how he managed to make such a simple device fail to work reliably. I suspect he's frequently logging fault calls when the clickpad buttons fail. Some people are just ham-fisted by nature I guess.
That sounds like a very long launch window for a hoped for March launch. I don't seen anything obvious in the linked application that might cover multiple launch tests. I'm guessing the engineers are less confident in the timeline than the marketing and publicity people.
Boing STARliner[*]? Virgin Galactic[**]? They're all it, driving by marketing departments and the coloured pencil brigade.
* It's a souped up Apollo capsule, no more, no less, barely passed the stage of the Wright Flyer, not an air or ocean liner by any stretch of the imagination.
** Give me a break! They don't even go to orbit!! (VG is the space tourism bit, not to be confused with Virgin Orbit which can actually, you know, get to orbit. Sometimes)
I would imagine, with the lifting capacity of most larger rockets, especially Starship, and the location of the payload, it should be relatively simply to launch nuclear fuel in a way that the properly designed container is extremely unlikely to be compromised in a launch vehicle explosion or the impact on crashing into the sea.
...it's notable that MS change management happens when it's least likely to affect the home market so rest of the world gets 12 hours or so of beta testing. Or am I I ascribing maliciousness where only ignorance is in play? Maybe the people making the decision on when to apply changes don't understand that time zones around the world cover more than the 4 or so hours most "lower 48ers" have a vague understanding of?
"Planetary ANalogue Geological and Astrobiological Exercise for Astronauts (Pangaea)"
Not only is that one of the more forced backronyms I've heard in a while, ANalogue? Really? Yeah, I know it also means "a model" or "simulation", but most of the public will associate that with "old fashioned" technology. It's all digital maaaaan!
(And yes, I'm fully aware that analogue technology is alive and kicking and has uses where digital just can't compete. (Volume controls being the most obvious example :-) I don't care if it only goes up to 10 or if it reaches 11. I also has to have infinite variability between, not fixed steps which usually don't have a "just right" setting, being either just too low or just too loud)
Not just the US either. Most countries will shoot the messenger if they bring bad news!
"So far as I know, Microsoft wrote all the code for Windows itself."
A lot of the stuff included with Windows is from companies they bought, depends on how you define where the OS ends and the included apps start. Not sure about nowadays, but for many years they used the FreeBSD networking stack and credited the Regents of the University of Berkley as per the (very open) licence terms.
"some outfits think they can have a QA or coder or administrative staff person "do IT" in their spare time. I've even had to help clean up a situation where the hands-on IT person was more of a facilities caretaker than anything else -- not even the proverbial "electronic janitor"."
Aaaaand we come full circle. That pretty much describes many of the SMEs I used to visit back when MSDOS was still king of the desktop and Novel was the King of servers. Si9nce it was often the accounts dept/office which got the first PCs, the Finance Director, Accountant or finance office manager was often also the "IT manager".
Yes, because "secure the open-source software" is actually the easiest part. It's much harder to secure the commercial code that you can't inspect, relying only on the supplier to do it for you, or inspecting the inputs and output of the "black box". If securing any FOSS you use is your responsibility, then securing the commercial software you use is the suppliers responsibility. Making the commercial supplier legally responsible if it's not secure might be a good start, starting with MS. At the very least, legally invalidating the common licence clause which basically absolves the company making the software to take no responsibility for it even working at all, let alone working properly.
"one AIM-9X Sidewinder missile"
Why? If it's really a spy balloon, it's already done its job. If it's not a spy balloon, it was a waste of time shooting it down. Either way, the missile and flying time of a fighter jet was probably orders of magnitude more than the value of the balloon. This feels more like face saving because they didn't detect it arriving in the first place.
Yeah, if Trump was in charge, he'd create a new anti ANTI-JINESE DEFENCE FARCE of Lawn Chair Larrys to go up there and shoot them down. (and with snazzy new uniforms with lots of gold braid too!)
Frankly, I'm amazed the yanks are showing restraint. "It's coming right for us...!"
Agreed :-)
"If you're not on your lawn getting noisy shots of every speck in the sky, you're missing out."
And with comments like that, there's probably a certain demographic taking potshots at any little speck in the sky in the belief they can see a fairly small "Chinese balloon" flying higher than most aircraft can go and their little pop guns have the range to hit it :-)
"Only issue was repeatedly answering the same questions from all the techies curious about high-end kit."
And the techies were probably quite impressed at the forethought of the organisers to put all the blinkenlights out on show instead of hiding them away. It was all part of the learning experience :-)
"The number of times I've seen such a light when walking by"
Yeah, I once got called out to a Compaq server with a 3 disk RAID array that had failed. I got there and there were two red lights showing two failed drives. I asked the on-site person (non-techy type), in conversation, when the two lights had come on. "Oh the second one came on yesterday, the other one has been on since I started here". Oops! Clearly their head office were not monitoring or checking to make sure someone on site was aware of how to at least keep a basic eye on things. No blame for the on-site non-techy person though. She had little knowledge about MS-DOS and none at all about Novel servers, that wasn't her job. She knew how to drive the PC to do her job.
On a similar note, an "emergency" HDD replacement on a similar vintage server, out of hours, so no one on site to query other than security, Only one failed drive in this case so I go to pull the hot-plug drive and note that there is a lit "failed" LED and the "faulty" drive has been removed already. Called over the security guy to confirm what I was looking at (Always have a witness, just in case). Phoned their IT guy and asked about the state of the drives when he left for the day. He says he pulled the faulty drive ready for me arriving. I could almost hear the "gulp" when I told him he'd pulled one of the two remaining good drives and the array was now toast.
Yes, because who better than MS themselves ought to be able to target only the specific registry keys related to not only their own apps but this very tiny sub-set of apps. Possibly just semantics, but there;s no need to "scan the system" for these 3 or 4 apps. If they don't trust their installer to have removed old and no longer used registry keys from previous versions that are no longer there, then again, who better than MS to be able to check for those very specific and unique files that should be in a certain place if the app is still installed.
"pissing about with randomly broken dependencies whenever I try and roll out out any updates,"
FWIW, that's actually more rare than Windows breaking systems with their fixes these days. Other than that minor niggle, you're pretty spot on with the rest of your comment :-)
(FreeBSD user here. I can't remember the last time I had a dependency issue either from package updates, system updates or minor/major version upgrades)
As someone who has spent a lot of time driving around North Yorks and had not heard of this village before, I was curious as to where it might be. According to Google Maps, there is only one village in the entire UK called Higher Whitley and it's in Cheshire, not North Yorks. That's quite a significant geographical error on the part of El Reg. Cut'n'paste of information without fact checking?
Nah, they'll just make such a part of Windows that no one can do without it then change their Ts&Cs so ban apps that offer equivalent services to those provided by the OS while sneaking in the "Zune App" which will kill Spotify as they have been lured in to relying on Windows for their income stream :-)
a message from Bright Data citing the business relationship between the two firms: "Meta has long been a valued client of our proxy and scraping services for at least the last six years."
So, in a legal filing, with the publicly accessible bit redacted in their own claim, made visible in the Facebook claims, Bright Data don't seem to be able to check the status of their client. Facebook, and definitively state when the contract started, give or take about a year? Don't they keep proper records of contracts and payments?
That doesn't bode well for Bright Datas side of the case. Although I'd be happy for this one to run on and on for years through higher and higher courts, even if it does mean the lawyers get rich since it'll be two "scum sucking bottom feeders" duking it out at their own expense.
"It's also almost grotesquely overcomplicated and cluttered with options to twiddle."
That sounds odd. Most people I know using Windows moan about the lack of configurability offered there, and it's spreading to other desktops. Our way or the highway seems to be the motto, especially in the commercial world, and seemingly moving in to the FOSS world too. Can you have too many configurable settings? Just don't touch the ones you don't understand or care about. In my book, that's far better than NOT being able to change something that I DO want to change :-)
"Perhaps there's a market for a Linux/BSD desktop which does all the setup via questions on installation? But wait... perhaps too many choices."
I've occasionaly seen moves to make a fully scripted install of FreeBSD, but rarely to those efforts go as far as scripting an install of a GUI desktop. I'd have though that would be a worthwhile project for someone and far simpler than creating a whole new "distro" I get the feeling that's pretty much all that most Linux disrtos are anyway, "Under the hood", it's still pretty much the "parent" linux with a fresh lick of paint and some aditional scripts/small programmes to specifici features.
"Things like coal stack chimneys are especially expensive to demolish and cart off. I didn't see anything."
Not to mention the cost of cleaning the land, especially the land under the coal stockpiles. I would imagine the US solution would be to fence off the land, place signs stating the land is contamintaed, and then build the solar farm diectly on it.
There does seem to be a constants stream of pollution and contamination scandals coming from various places in the US over many decades with supposedly respectable companys allowing or not checking for runoff into farming land or the water table.
As someone mentioned the other day, established and more wealthy economies can afford to "go green" while emerging economies such as much of Africa, large parts of Asia and South America can't, so are still investing heavily in the "cheaper" fossil fuels. Obviously there's still a level of hypocrisy in the 1st world governments, but not as much as you imply.
Ooooooh, of course. I'm glad you posted that! Here on the right side of the pond, a truck is something used for heavy haulage. The "Cybertruck" is that over-sized car thing. I had completely the wrong image in my head. I thought that was about the big heavy haulage truck he's also developing.
"I'd stick with the diesel for now thanks."
Good for you! I'd bet most EV owners, other than maybe the most ardent greenies, would agree with you. I single long haul flight probably outweighs your annual emissions :-)
Just Googled it. A fully occupied 747 emits less pollution , but in the comparison that was a diesel car with a single occupant. So for your holiday trip will all the family, probably much less pollution than flying the same distance. I can't be arsed to work the numbers, but a flight is generally far, far further than a 200-300 mile caravan trip. And not all flights are filled. many are empty or near empty return flights at night just to get the plane at the right airport for start of day.
Yeah, saw that reported on the Beeb the other. It surprised me that it even existed and I was a bit disappointed. Then I considered where SpaceX is now with Falcon9, Heavy and soon-to-be Starship compared with where they started with Grasshopper. The economics and demand are very different though. We shall see.