Re: Virgin Orbit could continue in a shell form while chief executive Dan Hart...
SCO managed that for decades :-)
25376 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
According to Wikipedia, "LauncherOne made six flights total beginning in 2020, resulting in four successes and two failures. Following the failure of the company's sixth launch and an inability to secure additional financing,[5] the company laid off nearly all staff and suspended operations on March 30, 2023"
So no, VO weren't built on this single UK launch, the rest having been in the USA. But they do seem to have been living from launch to launch and didn't have the funds to cope with too many fails, or 2 out of 6 in this case.
Possibly some people are confused by El Reg referring to the launch as "the UK’s big hope for space launches", which could imply VO is a British company. Obviously some of those jobs will have been at the Cornish spaceport, ie "British jobs", but I suspect many were never going to be long term since I don't think it likely the UK can support enough launches to make the place viable yet, if ever. I suspect most of the "jobs" in Cornwall were imported US staff, engineers, controllers etc., flown in for the UK launch and now flown back home.
Depends on which side of the Atlantics version of "laid off" is being used by the now US -centric ElReg in a UK based story.
AFAIK, "laid off" in the USA means sacked or fired. In the UK, "laid off" is more likely used as a short term thing where the company can't afford to pay the wages and is attempting to re-finance/re-structure and hopefully take the staff back on in a few weeks or a month.
The risk is that it all fails and the people laid off end up redundant or the company starts up again but some people have found other jobs. The longer the shutdown, the less likely the good staff will still be ready, willing and able to come back. If too many of the essential staff don't come back, the company may fold anyway.
They're chasing the younger market because they appear to have money. One of the reasons the younger market has money to burn is because they can't afford to get on the housing ladder and are living with the parents for many more years than young people previously did. So they want the "hip and trendy digital bank image", not some fuddy duddy old Victorian bank image of old in the hope that when those youngsters do finally scrape together enough for a house deposit, they will take out a mortgage with Clydsedale Virgin Money.
Most of these "hip and trendy" online banks are not new businesses. They are just re-brands of the old established order. The Co-Op Bank did the same with Smile. There no hint on Smile website that it's owned and operated by Co-Operative Bank.
"and lending unlimited copies."
Not true. It's been made clear in every article I've read on this subject, at least two here on El Reg including the parent article of this comment section, that IA are digitising books they own and then lending out one single digitised copy per book owned,
With MS, would we even notice the extra patches? It's nearly Patch Tuesday again!
With Google, it seems to be down to device manufactures, so not holding my breath (although my Samsung A12 just got another update last week!)
With Apple, I have no clue. I've not properly used an Apple computer since I played with an Apple ][ many years ago :-)
"If I was in incharge of Gov issued phones/tablets, they would be MDM'ed to the nth degree... no app store and the minimum needed for them to do their jobs."
Our company did that. It took weeks if not months to get the approvals through to add back all the apps we actually need to do our jobs properly. Like OEM diags tools which are absolutely required on a day to day basis. AFAIK there was no consultation or notice period. Someone high up simply decided it should happen and suddenly the "app store" had something like 5 or 6 apps in it.
Isn't Candy Crush a default menu item in Windoiws10/11 these days? Surely it's not "recreational", it's part of the default install :-)
And doesn't every office have a least one X-Box for all the users to connect to over the LAN? Why else would the shortcuts in the start menu be there by default?
Then "IT" manglement aren't doing their jobs properly. It's up to them to prove the business case by itemising the cost of secured access to employees own $random phones. Even just the time spent adding users to an exiting InTune or similar management tool and then keeping it up to date as people join and leave the org is a significant ongoing cost. Of course, there will different budgets involved, so the bean counters need to be convinced that no matter the budget it comes from, it's still hitting the bottom line!
That reminds me of as book I read many years ago.
It tells the story of a boy growing to manhood in the land of Shant, a society composed of many different, and wildly individual cantons, some of which are run by cults. Each adult wears an explosive torc which can be detonated by remote command, bringing about instant death by decapitation."
"So how much are they planning to charge for the ARM chips used in Maseratis Lamborghinis and BMWs."
Excellent point. I foresee lots of court cases attempting to not only define exactly what the "end user device" is but is the "value" what the end user pays or what the OEM builds it for? Retail prices vary from country to country as well as over time. If a phone is discounted does Arm get a proportionally lower royalty?
Buy Samsung phones and tablets. Comes with a FREE Arm processor!![*]
Note, the CPU is not part of the device and if you insist we do have models available with no pre-fitted CPU at EXACTLY the same price, just to prove that the CPU really is FREE!
"An equally interesting question is what's the maximum distance a hypothetical alien race of a roughly similar technological level could detect us from. Not just by radio but spectral analysis of the atmosphere and any other viable form of remote sensing."
Good point. We'll know when we find one :-
Yes, after all, what evidence might there be of our civilisation in 65 million years if we got a "dinosaur killer" tomorrow? Even the plastic particles will have degraded by then. Maybe there'll be evidence of the degraded chemicals left from plastics in the equivalent of a future KT boundary layer?
"though 'not that often' is a different question for a five-user app vs a five million user one!"
Like the infamous "some users were affected" when it's a cloudy system used by millions and "some" is a significantly large number when stated on it's own, even if it's "only" 1 or 2% of the total users.
"Hint: it isn't about metrics."
Exactly that. If OFSTED are so clever at defining what good education is, why is every child not leaving school with a single rating across their entire educational performance with a certificate marked Outstanding, Good, Needs Improvement or Inadequate? Why so many grades for so many subjects when clearly a single word from a list of four is the optimum level of assessing the students academic abilities, just like with the even larger complexities of a school? Not to mention that they have a limited number of metrics to assemble into this one word rating that doesn't take into account the many other things a school does to make it a good place.
"Brown declined to go into further detail, but according to a leaked term sheet seen by Reuters, that funding amounts to $200 million, which, by virtue of the fact of the leak and the subsequent share price rise, is just $20 million shy of Virgin Orbit's current market capitalization. If the deal goes through, the VC wouldn't just get controlling interest, but become the de facto owner."
If Brown "injects" $200m, and becomes the de facto owner, then either he bought the company by paying that £200m to the current owner(s) and there's still no money to run the company with or he's basically lending the money to them, in which case he's not buying shares in the company, but obviously will have a level of say. Does anyone know how this actually works? Is Branson or whoever actually owns the company selling it for like $1 maybe?
Do "activist investors" ever do any good? When I ever I see them mentioned, it seems like one or more rich people and/or orgs buying in and forcing a company to do something it doesn't want to do, then cashing out with a profit and no concerns at all about what happens to the company afterwards.
...I do wish these people stop touting their "super excitement" at fail to launch because "some key targets" were met and data was collected. Inside, I'm sure they are gutted. I have no doubt that the bits that did work were a success and that's a good thing, but the launch as whole was a failure. Just tell it like it is. The investors know, it didn't reach space. A major part of the launch failed. They will look into what happened and the investors will make their decisions appropriately. Just tell us it fucked up and they will study what went wrong and fix it. Be honest.
I can see why it's not finalised during the editing stage, I can also sort of see why it may not be finalised just because you save it since you may not actually be finished editing it, so maybe it needs to be made clearer to the users when and how to use the "compress image" tools. Maybe Yet Another Pop-Up(tm) reminding the user every time they same?
Ta for the info :-)
It beggars belief that devs could get something as simple as image cropping so badly wrong. What the fuck were they thinking? Did not ONE of them notice the file sizes not changing or not reducing enough?
It's bad enough when users embed huge images into Word documents and then scale them using Word and the entire huge image is still there instead of being actually scaled to the size the user chose. But this is a whole other level of shitty programming!
I'm left speechless!
Does the Google API give all the cookies to any extension asking for them?
Surely an extension only needs to read it's own cookies and, if it's say, an ad blocker, know the names of the cookies. Maybe the API should NOT be giving total access to all of the cookies to any extension that asks for them except under very strict and very carefully curated circumstances.
"It was never meant to benefit the consumer in Amazon's eyes. DPReview is loaded with Amazon links for everything discussed that Amazon sells. That alone would make me very suspicious."
As a relatively frequent IMDB user, I've seen exactly the same happen there too. They also seem to be moving parts of the info to the paid-for "pro" section too. Just waiting for them to buy up TMDB and/or TVDB.
"For physical safety, I guess a USB extender with relays to allow remote activation."
Relays? Just don't plug the extender in until after the device is plugged in and placed behind the blast shield. Then plug the extender cable into a power source, or if feeling brave, a computer.
"It really is an evil idea."
On the other hand, people have clearly STILL not learned to plug in unsolicited devices. Maybe if enough people learn that plugging it in might cause an explosion, they might think twice at plugging in the random USB pendrive "helpfully dropped" in the car park by your local friendly h4xx0rs.
I'd not wish anyone to come to harm, but this is exactly the sort of "security scare" many users need to be made aware of. Of course, even then, the "it won't happen to me", or "it only happens in far off countries" mentality soon kicks in.
"Panspermia is a bit of a cop-out and unnecessary. It suggests the chemicals needed to spark life came from a biome rather than lifeless coincidence but those chemicals are pretty common in space so while not ruling out panspermia it doesn't really matter."
And not forgetting, of course, the biggest cop-out of panspermia. For "life" to be travelling through space to "seed" planets, it had to start somewhere first. Whether that be a planet or clouds in space, somewhere, the building blocks of life had to form first.