Re: This is not how security works
I tried https://www.phe.gov.uk/ and got Error code: SSL_ERROR_BAD_CERT_DOMAIN
25376 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
But considering it's been all over the news for weeks now, including details of how than manual contact tracing works and that the app is still not ready/being tested on the Isle of Wight, I'm gobsmacked at the numbers posting here who clearly have no clue and are ill informed. Have we been invaded by Sun readers?
"The whole thing is a fucking farce."
It may well be, but clearly you have no idea what a "contact" is or you'd not have mentioned the 90 people you passed in the street and *may* have been within 2m of you for a second or two. After 2 months of being told constantly what a "significant contact" is, you still haven't got yet.
Actually, he doesn't. If you listen carefully or read the transcripts, he says things that any reasonable person would infer as to mean what you say above but always, always is said in way that leaves him an "out". Her is NEVER explicit in those sorts of claims. It only sounds like he is rambling on like a buffoon because that's what he wants you to think.
Maybe the AI just needs to pass the same driving test a human currently has to. I mean a proper test, not one like in some places where driving forwards 100yds and then reversing 100yds successfully is a pass. I mean one with a proper theory test identifying hazards etc as well as a proper drive out on the road with an examiner. Although an additional factor would be that the AI has to be able to demostrate a learning capability too. People incapable of learning at a reasonable rate or level are unlikely to pass a driving test.
"just have the car shout at the driver."
Maybe the car should be playing a constant tone where the frequency varies by numbers of decisions made and the assess accuracy of the decisions based on the earlier and later observations of the system and/or other detections constantly happening. This would train the "driver" to realise what is happening and learn when and how often things are going wrong. Many people, even non-techies, could tell when the dial-up modem was going to connect or fail to connect or even when it connected at a low speed and to manually hang up and try again, just from the noises it made. It will even have the knock on effect of keeping the driver more attentive.
"It was an interesting learning curve for the callow 20something year old me. About people, not computers."
The lesson, of course, being that people don't like change. If the new system doesn't work the same as the old system then it's too much effort to have to learn it. This applies doubly so when replacing a manual system with an automated system. Step one when designing a new system is to ask the users what they do, how do they do it and why do they do it then make sure the new system works the way they want it to.
If they'd launched on Weds, I was hoping to see that too. But after a beautiful sunny day, it clouded over just enough that the moon was the only visible object in the sky. Today, I was able to watch the launch live but by the time there was a likelihood of the ISS and or the Dragon being overhead, the sun was still shining in another beautiful clear sky.
There does seem to be some sort of higher power conspiring to hide anything interesting happening above our heads. Meteor shower? Cloudy. Eclipse? Cloudy. ISS? Cloudy. Our Great Lizard Overlords doing a flypast? Cloudy.
How to identify a witch
No one seems to know what the illegal act was though. When being arrested, the arresting officer is supposed to tell you why you being arrested as well as reading you your rights. From the live video feed, neither of those appear to have happened. The reporter has since said that the arresting officer said he was "only following orders".
"Many will read the headline now, go yee-haw and never notice that in law it never existed"
Like his vote winning promise to re-open the coal mines. Since he became President, US coal usage has dropped by over 15%. I suspect that none of the mine re-openings or saving/increasing miners jobs has actually happened. I wonder how many of those miners will vote again for him? Or might they notice the lack of new mines and jobs?
If that's the correct explanation, then it makes sense. But it's not the first time I've seen the phrase "wireless FM radio" where wireless is being used redundantly because everything has to be "wireless" these days. Mind you, I'm old enough that I can still see the term "wireless FM Radio" and think the "FM Radio" part of it is redundant because I already *know* what a feckin' wireless is.
Now get off ma lawn unless you are here to help me string the 30 foot aerial across to the washing line post.
Don't confuse the job title "Manager" with people who actually manage people and/or aspects of the business and have the authority to do so. These days, for example, bank mangers are little more than office supervisors and have almost no ability or authority to deal with your account issues. Likewise, most of the 20-somethings who seem to "manage" retail shops. And there's the "building manager" in many places who is basically a handyman/woman/person or caretaker. In IT you'll often get job titles which include "manager" and they are nothing of the sort in the traditional sense. Systems Manager, Server Manager, Apps Manager, Network Manager; all in the same team with no one directly below them or answering to them, but they do actually "manage" some hardware or software.
Nope, never heard of it. I've just watched a lot of Time Team and similar TV shows. I had to Google the Weans. An interesting short read. I got some of the references, but likely missed a lot of US related ones. It started off good but then seemed to head off into amateur sleuth territory, as if it was written by someone with a smattering of archaeological and social history knowledge but certainly no expert. I think fan fiction is probablywhat it most felt like. ie, nearly as bad as my writings :-)
"I wonder if, when it all falls apart, anything will survive from the work being done now in astronomy?"
In 3000 years, someone will be laughed at for postulating that The Great Giant Wok of Aracebo used to be a primitive telescope. Meanwhile, the World Heritage Monument and Parks Trust will continue to re-paint the inner surface with a light coating of vegetable oil, just as the primitive shaman intended.
Remember folks, all archaeological finds are clearly of a religious nature until proven otherwise.
Yeah, and to find out if we have your data, please send a 5x7 portrait photo, also left and right profiles, your full name and address, any other names you may be known by and previous addresses for the last 15 years.
Oh yes, if you can get the inside leg measurement of your postman's aunt Bertha, that would be nice too.
Additionally, that publicly available searchable information is all over the place. I'd like to see them do a facial recognition search without taking a copy of and storing all those images, ie "making a copy" for commercial usage as opposed to going off to "look at" each image on it's host server at the time of the search. IIRC, Google got stung a while ago with this sort of data scrape and store and so now only keep a small, relatively poor quality thumbnail and then link to the original if the user wants the larger image, most often to the page and not just the image itself.
"Great. So I can get anyone I don't like locked up for two weeks simply by giving their name. That could be fun."
You know they don't contact you to trace possible infections until after your test comes back positive, don't you? I would also expect the contact tracer to ask the infected person where they met their suspected infectees. If I get a call from a contact tracer I'll be asking them where and when I supposedly met this person so I could confirm the accuracy or otherwise of the claim. No need to know who it is or pass on any personal data. I very much doubt the contact tracers will simply bas asking for names and addresses because that's not enough information. They need to know the risk level too, ie were you close to the person for a significant length of time.
"being in quarantine is bad enough, being entirely unavailable means that other arrangements would be required, at additional cost and difficulty."
Not a problem. You can safely and legally drive at least 260 miles to take your dependants somewhere safe, even while infected and showing symptoms. This matter is now closed.
You should never pooh pooh a pooh pooh