Re: Alternatives are good.
"Sadly, the mutt liked mustard on his wood..."
See icon ------------>
25427 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
"also during which it suffered a spectacular data breach "
FWIW, TWO spectacular data breaches in consecutive years before she ran away from the mess. Lessons clearly NOT learned.
NB, edited title down as "the title is too long" since the Re: got auto added.
"As for the Post Office ex CEO (what about previous CEOs ?) she says (in essence) we relied on what we were told and it wasn't really our role to oversee this stuff anyway."
Clearly one or more people further down the food chain were "shielding" the board from the bad news and thus were criminally negligent. Someone, somewhere was hiding the bad news and lying by omission at the very least. Or the board DID know but made sure they were only ever told orally, so no paper trail.
"I believe that the average American is vastly smarter than the media folks are prepared to admit."
That is so true! However, the bar is set extremely low by the media.
Having said that, there are some clever USAians who are simply poorly educated or have been fed lies for long they simply don't understand certain things because they have no background knowledge. I've seen it posted here a few times that many, many Americans have no little or no clue about how bacteria and viruses spread because it's either not covered or barely touched on in educational settings lower than university. (Maybe that depends on where in the US they were educated/?) I hear that in some places the theory of evolution is given the same or less importance than the hypothesis of creation.
"Or do they look after their own kind?"
Of course they do. Look at the cops charged recently in the US where the video evidence, at least as presented, is pretty much incontrovertible, the degree of the charges being the only obvious bone of contention, and yet some of their colleagues "called in sick" or even quit in defence of the accused.
Likewise, look closely at the police unions and their records on opposing more and better training and procedural changes in response to previous years and decades of discrimination and police violence.
"The College works on a strange and convoluted system and in the 2016 Election Hilary Clinton actually got more of the popular vote than Trump and still lost."
That can happen in the UK too. Not sure if it's ever happened, but "first past the post" means you won more seats, not necessaries more votes. Enough "just good enough" results wins the race even if you lose massively in all the other seats. This can also lead to a majority government with as little as 25% of the vote.
"these companies could never have grown as they have anywhere else but the US."
Possibly not as quickly, but there are other enormously large and wealthy companies in other areas of business. Some in the EU, many in SE Asia, some in India, pretty much everywhere actually. But yes, the worst offenders do seem to be US tech companies in particular.
I wonder if Ethos Capital and the string of shell/holding companies still exist and what their current capitalisation is? It seems fairly obvious to most that Ethos was set up specifically for this purchase to hide the real buyer from the limelight. But since I don't have an MBA, hey what would my opinion be worth anyway? Probably about as much as Ethos Capital.
If the first lot doesn't live up to expectations, then the second lot won't be saleable. So if there's not enough juice in the first lot, why would they split it into two lots to be sold at a different time? If there was little to nothing of value, they'd do better to pump the entire trove in one big hyped up sale.
"The number of people being picked up is no criteria if the majority have turned out to be innocent."
Everyone is guilty of something :-)
On a more serious note, I can see most of the world, especially the western world, looking for the silver bullet, ie a system which spits the name and details of the subject. In China, I could easily imagine that there are entire "call centres" full of people looking at the selected image and many, many likely matches spat out by the system and using the Mk I eyeball for the final step in the process. A process that here in the west would be seen as prohibitively expensive so government and law enforcement will happily accept the poor success rate and pass the costs onto the legal system to sort out. Rather like the US patent system, now that I think about it :-)
"at the scale included in the article the image of Obama and not Obama are very comparable indeed."
If you squint and blur your vision, the general shape is very good. But the skin tones are significantly lighter in the generated image. That's the bias showing. Generally, when upscaling or zooming a poor image to enhance it, you want to create new pixels between the larger pixels which are averages of the general area of the image. How you can interpolate lighter pixels between darker areas such that the average across the whole area becomes lighter is beyond me.
It'd be interesting to see what it does to a pixelated image of Trump after he's just come off the sunbed and is at is most "orange panda-like" best. It'd probably put glasses on him :-)
I thin k the biggest problem with the C5 was the battery and motor tech wasn't yet their to cope with using proper wheels and a decent chassis. New materials science used across the board (chassis, body, drivetrain, motors, batteries) should be able to produce a much better C5-a-like nowadays. Although I'd still not like to use one on the public roads.
blares "look at me, I'm a tosser" repeatedly at decent volume
That mean they would still be banned in York then :-)
"A microsatellite system that is constantly repositioning, relaunching etc just doesn't seem like a good fit for the above, even if the power requirements are reduced because of closer proximity to the ground - because that closer proximity also makes the ground station atmospheric compensation extremely difficult."
Do you think it might be possible if you can see many dozens of sats at the same time rather just the 3-10(ish) with current systems? Would the required levels of accuracy per satellite drop in proportion to the number of data points the receiver is able to work with?
"Try explaining to people that commercial television is NOT about showing entertainment, but that their main goal is to show commercials."
It's not quite that black and white. They have to show enough "good" entertainment to attract enough eyeballs that they can sell the adverts. Having said that, there is clearly a subset of humanity who are happy sit and watch adverts all day, hence the various shopping channels.
"So stop bothering us at 10 in the morning with an impending update"
Ah, but that is 5:30pm or thereabouts somewhere in the world so that's who they are targeting their convenience at. Timezones and timed updates? Yeah, no, don't think that's possible, it's complicated.
"That said, it's really trivial to pause Windows updates indefinitely. If no-one on your staff can figure that out, maybe even the above is too much to ask."
These are the people who use crayons and coloured pencils. They may well have highly advanced technological tools, but they may not have any "mechanics" on staff. They just "drive" the tools, have learned some of the right buttons to press and if anything "breaks", the just take it "to the garage".
"They're all still dumb as bricks most of the time."
That's a very good analogy. You can make all sorts of very useful things out of bricks. Bricks are very useful and come in different styles, shapes and materials so they can be used in different situations, On the other hand, you'd not really use bricks to build a car or an aircraft or even a ship, let alone a computer.
And so, likewise, algorithms are dumb, most of the time. They can do certain things very well. But they are not truly "learning" or "intelligent".
"At last, someone points out the "obvious" flaw in current A.I!"
Agreed, but I would point out that it's not the first time these flaws in so-called Artificial Intelligence or Machine learning have been referred to on these hallowed pages. I think pretty much all readers here would agree there is no such thing as "artificial intelligence" (apart from that poster who claims he i9nvnted it, of course!)
If they'd had any sense, they#d have taken advantage of the free jolly, taken you at your word, flew back and then almost certainly been sent back on another free jolly to confirm certain details that they "forgot" to clarify the first time around. I'm sure they could have turned it into "no case to answer" eventually anyway.
"If there wasn't looting where did all the video footage of people running out of broken windows carrying expensive goods come from?"
I blame Hollywood. US kids are brought up on a diet of TV and movies showing them how to behave if or when a protest turns nasty. The only thing missing was a zombie attack.
"CCTV-on-pole, has one draw-back,"
...it's impossible to quickly turn and focus based on sounds like a human being on a horse can. CCTV is great for the incident commander to get an overview and maybe evidential purposes, but you can't beat people on the ground for seeing and dealing with the detail and maybe escalating the situation.
Having said that, I also remember the miners strikes and what went on during that time.
Maybe you are too young to remember the days of the "firms" travelling to football matches specifically to fight the other "firms". It was a weekly occurrence all around the UK and lead to massive police presence at matches, away and home fans being strictly segregated, away fans being escorted in "parades", flanked by 100's of officers and horses from the bus/train stations to and from the ground, and an entire generation of young kids not being taken to matches, and the threats and fines from UEFA and FIFA against British clubs because of the violent fans.
Of course, the UK wasn't alone in this and some countries are still being sanctioned because of their fans behaviour to the extent that some internationals have been held behind closed doors cutting off that income stream.
There seems to be quite a few small startups that think running their entire business through the likes of Google Documents and Dropbox is the cheap and agile way to go. It all rather reminds me of the many small business that used now defunct ISPs home user accounts for their entire business email and web presence. I saw a plumbers van sometime in the last year with an AOL email address on it.
Wow! Apparently you can still get AOL accounts!!
Oh yes, I remember Newbrain laptops with their one or two lines of green led display being in pharmacies many years ago. And it's not THAT long since I last saw one still there, in use.
I was pushed on one occasion, thanks to belligerence (must have been management) to answer the phone with "trying the same thing multiple times and hoping for a different result of a sign of madness".
But with the old electro-mechanical exchanges, sometimes a strowager relay would stick and not roll through the correct number of contacts, giving you a wrong number, even though you dialled the correct one. Re-dialling that same number again (and again) would eventually get you the right number most of the time.
"my GP refuses to hook up to whatever modern-ish system exists for referrals and they hadn't sent the correct fax over, or some such nonsense"
One of the silver linings of the CV19 cloud. GPs and pharmacies have been dragged kicking and screaming into the 21st century! Just a few short months ago, it was quicker to call in to the GP surgery and request a prescription renewal than to have to keep re-dialling the single phone line hoping to get anything other than an engaged tone. (They did already have an online offering, but my wife can't register for that because she doesn't have enough of the right kinds of ID to prove she's the same person that's been going to that GP surgery for the last 20 years.) They have a nice simple system now. A separate prescription renewal number you call, giving name, address DoB and prescription and it gets delivered a day or so later. Simple, works and minimum technology.
...why Google overrode my clear intentions. I had Google Assistant turned off on my phone. Suddenly one day last week it was not only turned on but spamming me with requests to look at all the wonderful new features. It's turned off again, of course. I think. At least I disabled it. Maybe. Until Google decides for me that it should be on again.