Re: You know you need coffee when..
"..you read the headline and think "How did they upgrade the ariel on Voyager?'"
See next weeks On Call :-)
25368 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
Yes, clearly, from yours and other posts, I'm not the only one thinking this. Surely "grounds for appeal" should include substantive reasons and/or new evidence, not just "we don't like the result". And likewise, as seen in some other cases, holding back evidence you should have used, but kept in reserve in case you lost so as to just the appeal needs to be stamped on to. It seems many of these big litigants seem to put forward just what evidence they think they need to win specifically so as to have something "new" for an appeal. What happened to "the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth"?
Maybe, maybe not. It's like changing the law. You can't prosecute retrospectively because something is a crime now, but wasn't then. Likewise if something was a crime then, but isn't now, it's unusual for people to be pardoned retrospectively. Even crimes committed historically and only arrested and charged recently are usually prosecuted and sentenced under the prevailing conditions at the time. It's messy, ugly and complicated.
Well, clearly, Home Taping Killed Music. So now it's YouTube-DL killing the already dead Zombie Music. Again.
Obviously the solution is to add a 10% surcharge[1] to anything capable of downloading content from the internet, such as YouTube-DL, curl and wget so it can be put into the RIAA coffers for the execs bonuses.
[1]What's 10% of nothing?
"where applications bundle third party DLLs that then go unpatched for security or stability issues."
Yes, this! Once you start compiling ion static libraries, everyone has to play ball when a vuln shows up in one of those multiple copies and they all need patching instead of just the one dynamically linked library.
Admittedly I'm probably spoiled by FreeBSD and it's ports/packages systems and a unified kernel/userland which rarely have the dependency hell the Linuxes used to suffer from, and still do in some respects.
Nets were not Google products when most people bought them. Unfortunately for them, Google bought Nest and the writing was on the wall. Google spent $3.2Billion on Nest and now they are throwing it in the bin. I hope the IP and tech they bought was worth it. On the other hand, maybe buying up companies for silly money and then shutting it all down a few years later is some sort of long game tax avoidance scheme. Or, on the gripping hand, maybe they just don't like other companies being successful so kill off those who might grow too big before they become to big to kill?
The may have gone with the 80's home computing form factor. Shame they didn't go with the full fat keyboard most models other the Sinclair went with, eg Tandy (not CoCo), Apple, C64, Atari (not the 400), Amiga, etc. I really don't like those Apple Airbook alike keyboards.
Does it? I don't recall seeing anything other US street scenes. If they do, then it seems odd that they know which country I', in but never seem to show any UK street scenes. Maybe it's only a tiny fraction of a percentage that is non-US and I've not been lucky enough to get a localised one.
"The most "exciting" cross-border incident for me was when my always-optimistic colleague only brought an out-of-date driving licence for ID for an internal UK flight."
In many cases, just because the licence is no longer valid for driving doesn't make the ID details on it any less valid. Although many jobsworths will try to make it so. My legally valid until I'm 70 pink paper driving licence has been almost refused as ID a number of times by people too young to know about them, even in a car hire place where they should have known better. Luckily there's almost always an older manager or other higher up around put the kids right :-)
"Maybe it's just time to let X die and replace it with something better, designed for the XXI century...."
Despite all the downvotes, that's not really such a bad idea. After all, Linus took Unix and wrote a work-alike based on the system behaviour. What's so bad at starting from the ground up with the X specs and starting from scratch with a modern work-alike? Get rid of the ancient cruft and add new features, optimising as you go.
"expect another maybe 10 years for the missing functionality to become available."
Yes, Wayland started gaining traction 10 years ago according to the article. 10 WHOLE FRIKKEN years. And it's still not ready for primetime! It's still not ready to replace X, for all of the X disadvantages. And I too am one those who frequently runs X programs remotely. Remoting into Windows PCs always feels so clunky because the ONLY option is get a full remote desktop, not just the program I need to run.
"Just got back from Cannes, and suffering 14 days isolation with SWMBO claiming that the Quarantine Stasi are watching me or tracking my mobile every time I take the dogs out for a walk."
Quarantine...I take the dogs out for a walk. Something doesn't compute.
And the date of the BIOS build doesn't mean that's when the machine was built either. Depending on how often a new BIOS is released to production, it could easily be 6-9 months that the boards were produced with that BIOS revision and date, and just as long or longer that they were on the suppliers shelves before they ended up and the machine manufactures.
HP have been doing this with PCs and laptops for years. The dreaded Feature Byte string can't be changed by the user and it defines the usable hardware in the system. It means you need to use their service or an approved service centre to replace or upgrade much of their kit.
ISTR that there was some issue with Police Officers reporting Polish drivers for offences and putting what the Polish is for "Driving Licence" on the report as the drivers name.
Ah here we go, it was Irish police huntung the serial offender Mr Prawo Jazdy of many and multiple unique addresses.
That makes sense for toggle switches, and was the usual standard in the UK when toggle switches were still around. But with rocker switches that only protrude out from the fascia by a couple of mm, it's not an issue. If you fall against one, it doesn't matter which way is on or off, odds are you'll flip it.
My great Grandmother, who was probably of a similar vintage to your grandmother, would not stand for electric cables to be twisted or otherwise be kinked "in case it slows or reduces the flow of the electrics and then things stop working". Again, related to gas appliances, such as the gas powered iron she used to use that was "plugged" into the outlet of a gas lamp via a rubber hose.
"I can't say I find a switch an essential feature, but it's handy sometimes. It's usually a lot easier to flip a switch down the back of the sofa (say) than to unplug."
Which leads to...just why ARE standard wall power sockets so close to the floor? They always seem to be the about the same low height, where ever you go. Is there some sort of regulation? If so, what's the reasoning behind it? Clearly they can be placed higher, eg kitchens along the work bench, or near dressing tables and similar in hotels.
"I don't know the actual reason but it makes it much safer to plug the iron in when it doesn't have a plug on it, just an inch or so of bare wire at the end of the cable. You use a plastic tail comb in the earth socket to pop the shutters then shove the wires in the live and neutral sockets. Pull out the comb and the shutters hold the wires in place."
Anyone else here getting flashbacks to the old Public Information Films, especially the one showing the guy using an electric drill "plugged" in using matchsticks and subsequently getting electrocuted as the earth wire pulls loose and contacts the live?
"Then you have to take into account all the Canada geese on the reservoir, townies coming over in summer when the reservoir levels are low and letting their dogs crap below high water mark and similar."
Reservoir water doesn't go directly into the water main. It goes through a treatment plant first. We don't store potable water in open reservoirs in the UK
Yes, Sell By, Best Before and Use By all have different meanings which may or may not mean the food might be unsafe after the specified date. In some case, Best Before or Sell By are only there because there is a requirement to have a date on it because the law says so. Canned goods, as you point out, could well be good for many, many years after the putative Best Before data printed on the can.
But it could read 2m as 4m, which is above the warning threshold. Of course, in that specific circumstance it's unlikely you'd be that close for that long, whatever the time limit is that the app/back-end is basing it on, but there are other circumstances where you may well be close to someone for that long, even though separated by a barrier of some sort. eg sitting 2m away from someone at work, facing in opposite directions or even separated by a perspex screen.. The scoring threshold does seem to be a bit low, and as has been mentioned is not helpful if we don't know for sure what exposure duration is being used.
"serious time...a sentence of up to five years in prison"
Considering the sorts of sentences often written about in these hallowed pages, 5 years sounds like being let off lightly. Isn't 125 years per offence, served consecutively more the going rate in the USA?
Yes thanks, the white one with the long arms and leather straps.
You do realise that the app is anonymise and any advice or recommendations on getting a test or self isolating are not legally enforceable. That's why the bit you quoted from the bank doesn't mention the app at all. It only talks about a direct communication and instruction from a human being at Track and Trace, which does have legal implication. Please don't spread FUD based on half understood information.
The more I hear of the US version of capitalism, the more it seem, from outsdide at least, that it doesn't work. It's geared to encourage monopolies which eventually have to be broken up. But they don't seem to realise that that is a problem, so after the break up, it all starts again with someone else (or the remnants of the break up) eventually becoming top dog again. It happened at the time of the robber barons with the likes of Standard Oil and Carrnegies Steel operations, The big Press Bartons etc. It happened again with Ma Bell, it's happeing again with the media and the likes of MS, Google, Facebook etc and it's clearly happening with comms and broadband. Once a company reaches a certain size, they have so much clout it's almost impossible for anyone else to enter the market.
"33 known UK citizens (including 6 with dual nationality) were extradited from the UK to the US. The US embassy in London reported that as of April 2013, 77 individuals had been extradited from the UK to the US."
Assuming that last stat was meant to read "from the US to the UK", I find it notable that the statement says "33 known UK citizens" but only mentions "77 individuals" from the US. "Individuals", not specifically "citizens". Considering the US preponderance to refer to their people as citizens in official statements, it sounds to me like a massaging of stats so as to tell the truth by not answering the question while trying to show themselves in the best light possible.