ISTR
ISTR recalling seeing similar in many Amiga demos :-)
25401 publicly visible posts • joined 21 May 2010
"This stunt might be a bit tricky for a human to carry off because our slow reaction time would dominate any visual feedback we had from the tunnel sides and floor."
You could say the same about car drivers on normal two lane roads with a 60mph speed limit. That's a closing speed of 120mph against oncoming traffic mere feet away with just a white painted line, possibly faded, to offer guidance. And yet people do that every day without even thinking about and mostly don't have accidents.
"It is a valid question though, if full AIs emerge or are built, or aliens show up, how quickly can we get our laws updated so they are not treated under the law as objects."
I think most laws refer to "people" or "person/s". Only laws which refer to "humanity" or "mankind" would need changing, and I suspect those ones would mainly refer to human rights. IANAL, obviously :-)
I suspect "person" is not exclusively defined as humans, especially since corporations are already "people", so it may not be a stretch to include non-human intelligence as a person. Aliens who manage to get here are pretty certain to be classed as an intelligence and therefore people, AI computers would need a bit more testing.
"The implied idea that a machine has "rights" needs to be fully investigated and justified,"
Not least of which, if successful, there's need to b e a clear definition of what type of "machine" is eligible for rights. After all, the simplest "machine" is a lever. That could be something as simple as a fallen branch from a tree. Am I no longer allowed to collect fallen branches to cut and burn for heat if it might be a "machine" with rights?
"This sounds more like a philosophical challenge than a legitimate grouse about patenting these specific inventions."
It sounds to me like he's just trying to big up his supposed AI. Maybe he's found a way to analyse the Patent database and find "gaps" where his algorithm can then automatically file patents based on the results or some other method of automating Patent generation such that he can coin it in if he can get legal backing for his "AI" claims.
There's a huge difference between a person following or stalking an individual and Bluetooth beacons all over a city, possibly many from the same company, "knowing" exactly which shops you go into, when and how often.
The fact that so few people realise this tracking can be done, and is happening, because "It never crossed my mind." is the worrying thing. This information is out there, it even makes the mainstream news every now and then. but it seems most people simply don't care enough to remember that until someone actually confronts them with cold, hard data. Simply telling someone that they can be tracked by BT, or online cookies, javascripts, off-site links to "assets" etc., etc., etc., and they might just possibly agree before it disappears from their mind again. Although it's more likely that in those circumstances, the vast majority will simply not believe or think it doesn't matter.
And yet, what we do online can and does come back to haunt some. Just the other week, a guy standing for election was lambasted by the opposition for some unsavoury stuff he posted on Twitter in 2010, 11 years ago! Worse, he's only 26 now, so he was a hormonal 15 year old boy at the time of his "infringements" and quite clearly no longer holds those same view. (FWIW, he's standing for a party I really don't like, so I'm not defending his politics at all here.)
Depends. Many people can listen to music without being distracted much at all from what they are doing. It's just background noise. The problem isn't so much the distraction as the severe reduction in external audio cues.
After all, some people prefer to work, code, do homework (looking at you teens!) with loud music blasting out :-)
Personally, when I'm driving, I listen to audio books. But I also know how to prioritise my awareness. Many's the time I've had to rewind a chapter and listen again because I've completely lost the plot by watching more intently on where I'm going. It also adds something to my awareness when driving long distances on motorways where it's easy to get bored and distracted when driving in silence.
I have RDS/Traffic Announcements on all the time because I drive a lot. It's not that unusual for the announcement to not be properly timed to match the signal broadcast to tell your radio to tune to it. From experience, I'd say it's purely cock-ups and timing errors on the part of the studio. The BBC went through a phase a few years ago where the Travel Announcements always seemed to start before the RDS TA signal was sent and then run on for a minute or two afterwards so you often missed the first part of the TA which would be the major roads. Nowadays, they seem to get it mainly right, but not all the time.
Lead times on all laptops and tablets are currently longer than usual, but 12 weeks instead of two days and no information from the customer support bods is taking the piss. Especially since Lenovo will have known about the long lead times before you even ordered it. I've seen lead times on some spares reported in the few to many months ranges, although do turn up quicker than that, usually, which indicates they are not only aware of the problem but also have little real idea of when stuff will become available. I image the production lines for their business grade kit has the highest priority for any parts that might be hard to get or or part of a more fragile supply chain.
Maybe El Reg could send an intrepid reporter to do a Geeks Guide to Britain article on the Avoncroft Museum?
"The museum also contains the UK's National telephone kiosk Collection. This is the largest collection of telephone kiosks in the country and is part of the Connected Earth heritage project. There are also three fully working analogue telephone exchanges (one of them a mobile TXE2[2]), a manual switchboard and early automatic systems. The collection shows the complete history of telephone kiosks in the UK from 1912 to the 1990s together with demonstrations of how telephone calls were routed and connected before the advent of digital technology. "
There seems to be a lot of people who are officially on call, and yet seem to be having a completely normal social life, like going out and getting pissed. I've not been on call very often, and not for many years, but it seems highly unprofessional to be on call and then not being in a fit state to actually do the job. I can only assume those people worked for crappy companies who didn't pay extra for being on call. In my case, we were paid an on call rate for the time being on call as well as overtime rates for any travel/work done. Those who were on an on call rota didn't get the on call rate but instead got a higher basic salary because that was part of their normal job, but still got the overtime rates for travel/work done and had a chart showing times/length of call out and how that related to whether or when they had to show up at work the next day.
"Seems strange to load up on cargo when they haven't actually had a successful launch."
They usually put a dummy load in to simulate the mass of what a normal production flight will do. In this case some of that dummy load was a (probably free) ride for a university experiment. I didn't see any mention of a customer payload that the uni experiment was attached to, so I'm assuming from that the uni experiment was the entire payload.
An excellent point. After all, it only seems to be in the US that the word "liberal" is treated as an insult ot swear word. I'm sure there are a liberal amount of other words in their list that also have no "bad" meanings in most of the rest of the world too. I'm guessing the Liberal Democrat Party won't be using GitHib to host their apps either.
Is it a right to appeal or a right to request an appeal? ISTR reading once upon a time that an appeal must have some justification such as a material point of law or new evidence not apparent at the original trial. ie there must be grounds for an appeal to be granted, otherwise it may be refused. Also, IIRC, new evidence must be new and newly discovered, and not evidence held back from the original trial simply to have ammunition for a new trial (as seems to be common in big cases in the US)
IANAL and all of the above may well be incorrect, hence the initial question.
"I Want A Hippopotamus For Christmas"
You may change your mind after seeing one having a dump. They don't just shit like a cow (ie almost a liquid), they also spin their tail like a propeller and spread it far and wide! I suppose if you are an arable farmer or have a large allotment, it might work well as an autonomous muck spreader.
Well, the warning signs have been visible for years. This is just one m ore of many. It's the way Chinese law works. If you as a foreigner want to set up shop in China, you need a local "sponsor" who will own 51% of your Chinese operation and have total access to any and all IP used in said business. That's been the case for decades and anyone setting up there knows that up front. Sadly, the rush for cheap labour and short term profits has blinded many to the long term problems. But once a few did it, everyone else pretty much had to do the same or see their market share eaten for lunch by those who did it first. Other cheap labour countries with less onerous ownership laws are and were available, but China has the money to invest in new plant and subsidies that other countries simply couldn't beat. Things are changing, but China is still reaping the harvest of decades of outsourcing production and has created it's own production and market.
"So how exactly does the host spacecraft command it to deploy, if the host spacecraft is inactive? Perhaps and automatic failsafe if it doesn't receive heartbeat from the spacecraft for more than some arbitrary period, but that carries its own risk of failure and prematurely deorbiting a working bird."
This initial iteration, the prototype, is designed to help speed up the return and burn up of used launch vehicles, so deployment at a set time or under set conditions very early in its life is the expected action. Later iterations for use on satellites will no doubt have other conditions which must be met before it deploys. Possibly a separate and independent receiver solely for receiving the deployment signal.
"Also, 'metre' and 'fiber' is making this sentence difficult for me to look at."
Metre, the unit of measurement is correct across the world, except in the US, as opposed to meter, a device to show a measurement, which is spelled the same all over the world (excepting those places which may use a different, local language word for meter). Other meaning and uses of the meter also apply, but no other meaning is ascribed to the word Metre.
Likewise, fibre and fiber are the same, the entire English speaking word spells is as Fibre, apart from, you guessed it, the US, who spell it Fiber :-)
"Assuming the artist rendition in the article is accurate, the sail increases the footprint of the satellite by about 3 or 4 times. 3-4x is still 3-4x, no matter how negligible the initial risk is."
That's true, but if you are within 2-3 rocket body diameters of another object, you're already seriously of course!
"alternative payment providers may not offer the same level of supervision that Apple offers."
Not offering the same level of supervision that Apple does could be a good thing. it depends on what the differences are and if those alternative payment providers might be more customer service oriented rather and Apple/Google more "money machine" priorities.
I suspect the answer will be a bit of materials science and thicker materials. The ISS was built when getting anything big and heavy into space was really, really expensive so those walls are pretty thin skin. With newer, cheaper and big launch vehicles, and a needed for those thicker (heavier!) walls, it should be less of an issue to put something up there with a known and much longer lifespan. The data from the long term exposure of the existing ISS materials will, of course, be very useful. I'd expect that when the last astronaut leaves, it won't just be a case of turning out the lights, but bringing back samples cut from the outside of the station before de-orbiting the remains.
"I do risky things but I would not put metal putty on a hot water boiler. I'm glad it has worked for you but that smacks of catastrophic failure."
He said tank, not boiler, so I'd assume from that it's an unpressurised, insulated storage vessel, not a pressurised boiler.
Well, to be fair, although they probably neither needed nor should have had that level of co-ordinate data, once the data had been stolen with full address and postcode, pretty much anyone could have correlated that data with mapping data. Having the coordinates just made it easier and quicker.
"Makes you wonder how nature managed before firearms were invented"
That would probably be back when this sceptered isle had actual large carnivores like wolves and bears and a proper natural and balanced food chain. Then those bloody Neanderthal moved in!
* you won't be home if they want to actually steal your firearm
If it's properly secured, that may take some time and possibly be a little noisy
* you WILL be home and will use your firearm(s) on THE CRIMINAL (I would)
If it's properly secured, you probably won't have time to get it out, load it and use it. On the other hand, if that's what they came for, then you and your family being there is just more reason to do as they say and give them any weapons and ammunition you have, nice and quietly.
It might be interesting to view crime stats later to see if criminals avoid the "firearm house" in favor of the one nearby with all of the lights off and an expensive entertainment system inside...
See above, it depends on what that specific criminal is looking for.