Re: Hackers entering GPS coordinates of OEM repair shops to prevent trains from failing?
Unfortunately (for them that is) the way this is blowing up means that the first option is out of question as well.
88 publicly visible posts • joined 7 May 2010
While that's true, this has blown up so big already (it made international news after all) that in no way would they make it even worse by attempting to punishing the hackers, especially now that the previous quasi-Nazi government of Poland has been replaced by its former opposition.
"there's a tendency for American laws to be applied globally" - While that's true, not even the disgustingly anti-competitive DMCA forbids reverse engineering in cases like this.
"But it begs the question as to why this sort of thing isn't illegal" - It kinda is. The managers who ordered this ugliness might be charged with the felony of disrupting state infrastructure, which carries a light jail time in many parts of Europe, probably Poland too.
"Anyone remember Microsoft and CP/M-86?" - While I do hate all the shenanigans of Micro$oft it's still a private corporation and it didn't disable any government resources with their petty tricks. Which can't be said about this thing.
If the evidence will stand in court then Newag who did this will be in a sea of pain and those who ordered this might face criminal prosecution even. And no letters/press releases about imaginary hackers will help them. If this happened in the US it'd be an average Tuesday instead, corporations are almost untouchable there.
Google's and the land owner's negligence notwithstanding due diligence while driving is always necessary. Let's say that a road is flooded during a heavy downpour - do I drive straight into the water (and get my car waterlogged) and later I blame Google? No, I turn around. And yes, mommy better explain the kids that daddy cannot be there with them anymore because he has made a rather stupid mistake, but admitting that would be too un-American I guess...
I think so, in Europe the regulatory oversight of such measures is performed by various government agencies. And if a company doesn't meet the regulatory requirements then it's fined. The fines can be challenged in courts, but it's rare for the courts to reduce the fines levied by the agencies.
"When a consumer obtains Plaintiffs' works from the Libgen Sites instead of through legitimate channels" - That's a big fat lie right there which they keep repeating in courts every single time and courts fall for it all the time too. In reality a BIG share of LibGen's content is literally unobtainable by other means, quite a few of those books have been out of print for many years now and no money-hungry publisher will issue a reprint of them anyway (given they're non-fiction, so they won't make a petty penny on them anyway).
This truly adds insult to injury. It also makes me wonder: how will ARM minions go to universities giving presentations and trying to coerce people to join their ranks now? I mean they should really expect an influx of nasty remarks and questions everywhere, at least that's what I'd do.
"the SimilarTech research company reports that over 10 times as many businesses are using CentOS over RHEL" - As others have pointed this out already, there really isn't as much money on the table as IBM/RedHat seems to think. Eve though there really MIGHT be 10x more CentOS installations on the web than RHEL quite a few of them are run by SMEs who just don't have the budget for RedHat support. Pushing them hard will simply mean that they'll adopt something else, say Debian or Ubuntu.
"RH will simply terminate the free developer access programme" - I think that that'd be the last straw. If developers will have to pay a lot to be able to develop for RHEL then they're not gonna do it, simple as that.
"I can't see why companies would jump through these hoops." - One major reason I can see is Pacemaker. And the other lies in the fact that they have all their customers still running their production systems on legacy CentOS (6 and 7) installations.
The reason people gloss over Fedora's dependency more easily is because it's an upstream distro meaning that it's not gonna be installed on servers en masse the way CentOS was (and Alma/Rocky Linux will be) ever. And this makes the whole project much less critical in terms of general infrastructure too.
"and the problem was resolved in just a week, as opposed to never." - I think the fact that the story has gained international fame had a lot to do with this. As for the reason you almost always are given some vague, non-descript and unspecific reason for getting your account blocked, but then you get promptly ignored.
This isn't quite this easy. Amazon, Micro$of, Google and all the rest of the bastards can even make you agree in license that they can sell your organs or sell you into slavery if you fail to pay their monthly fee but they still won't be able to enforce it (no matter how badly they want to anyway). If Amazon is found to be doing something illegal in any jurisdiction where they try to pull this kind of stunt off they still can be held liable and even a class-action lawsuit can proceed against them. Oh and believe me, some lawyers would be VERY happy to take on cases like this, because the awarded damages can be quite hefty.
I mean if I wouldn't have been VERY suspicious of sketchy cloud-based services up until now this definitely would've been my last straw. Either way this incident not only makes sure I'll never buy any Amacrap IoT/cloud/Internet-enabled device EVER, but I'll completely ditch the idea of having ANY of my devices connected to the cloud. This is simply unacceptable and an utter disgrace.
> It's not only Covid that's done damage to the Chinese economy but also Xi Jinping himself with his none too subtle attacks and restrictions against China's tech sector so he has been effectively strangling the goose that lays the golden eggs for China.
Oh yeah. Just when the whole West was holding their breath and worrying that China might actually surpass them in terms of technology development the Chinese have successfully shot themselves in the foot so the West can now breathe a sigh of relief. It was a close call but with their insane measures against their own tech sector they might be done for for a while. We all have the Dear Leader Xi to thank for that!
> You only have to look at the European gas debacle to see how things have changed.
Actually those pipelines were (mostly) laid down during socialist times, so that's not a brand new problem at all. And the power of "Star Wars" wasn't only in the COCOM (although that was admittedly a big part of it as well), but also the act of tricking the USSR into using all of its resources to finance something (i.e. a space race) which they just simply couldn't finance. And this approach might actually work right now just as well as it did ~40-50 years ago.
.> It is a huge landmass and the elite are very rich.
The same could be said about Russia too and look what happened...
Even if we assume that China has become more confrontational lately thanks to the policies of Trump (which were long overdue and had bipartisan support anyway) China did act like a bully even to countries like Australia thinking that they can force the OZs into obedience, so they've more than earned what's coming to them. OTOH threatening civilian airplanes is not only not gonna earn them ANY sympathy anywhere in the world (I think that we still remember what happened to the KLM flight that flew over Donetsk), it'll also attract even more attention from US warships and submarines.
Because those suppliers are probably con organizations who are exclusively in the business of selling fakes. The overwhelming majority of such fakes is literally purpose-made stuff (probably mostly stuff that didn't pass QC at the semiconductor fab) and not just something that "slipped through" due to issues with QC. 40% is WAY too high of a number for that.
"It's obviously the only way to be sure." - No. The only way to fix this mess would be to fix 'murica's utterly broken DMCA that's full of loopholes and which almost openly encourages legal extortion, racketeering and corporate bullying. And fixing that would have the pleasant side effect of discouraging bogus copyright claims as well.
"Also, the "no tailgating" rule is impossible to enforce pretty much anywhere outside of a secure mental health unit or a prison." - Some managers seem to think otherwise and enforce rigid (and rather idiotic) door entry policies for that (the card only lets someone out if he/she used it to get in and vice versa). Manglement's creativity (and sadism) is limitless.
I swear that articles such as these are NOT written (nor recommended) by IT guys, but by those CSO types instead which I had the "fortune" to meet in my life. They seem to want to run everything like the Soviets ran Eastern Europe before 1989: monitoring everyone (including their private communication on social networks of course), giving the least amount of access (he can't do his work properly? Who cares?), encouraging EVERYONE to be suspicious of their colleagues (I've seen such idiotic campaigns alleging that the evil wrongdoer is among the corporate monkeys) and of course to report everyone for anything that seems even remotely suspicious. And then they don't understand why does IT crowd leave that company in flocks like rats abandoning a sinking ship. No sane person would want to (voluntarily) work in such a hostile environment (although mortgage does wonders).
Then there's this statement that has REALLY cracked me up: "Give them a way to do so identifiably but with guaranteed confidentiality (never anonymously – you can't follow up)." ROFLCOPTER Does any sane person actually believe that any information they report would be confidential (even with the false promise of anonymity, let alone without)? Especially when it involves one's own supervisors? Or to turn it around: could anyone believe that if being accused of something they could defend themselves in any reasonable manner? In corporations with cutthroat attitude and morals (or lack thereof)? This is REALLY something that only someone working as a CSO (or for one) can actually believe in. Everybody else is sane enough not to believe any of this BS.
"Their software, their license, so they can do what they want" - Not quite. If any company would take them to court and prove that Oracle's doing this (mislabeling its own virtualization solution) only to keep the competition out (i.e. as an anti-competitive measure), they could sue Oracle for quite a lot of money (and other lawsuits would follow too).
"Had they used a physical server or a one/two node VMware solution they wouldn't be facing this huge bill." - Except that companies that pretty much need to have Oracle databases usually aren't running their VMs on only 1-2 nodes of course....