Re: To the people asking what £450m will buy a bank...
Well, all I can say is that if that had been a government IT spend you could have added a 0 to the figure
5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
"A thought the batshit paranoid free speech 'stazi' community of commentators might occasionally bear in mind when bleating on about the tyrannical dictatorships of the US, UK, Sweden etc. etc"
Whilst I understand where you are coming from, Gitmo bay, renditions and the UK helping them do it are hardly above reproach in terms of human rights.
There are still people in this country being held without charge indefinitely and allowed no legal representation. How does that add up in your utopian society then?
Has anyone there explained why the fuck there was DATA on there AT ALL!
The website should be the front window, everything of meaning should be done behind the scenes with the web server making authenticated requests of the back end servers (which is a lot easier to secure than hosting data on a bloody web server).
Who came up with this hokey standard anyway?
"Banks do not invest money in currency"
I don't think you understand the Forex market at all then.
Banks buy and sell currencies all day long, in fact you could almost say that they were 'market makers'.
No-one invests in currency unless you're taking a long position in the carry trade. You buy low and sell high, it's as simple as that.
People who say they are ok with this level of surveillance have simply not touched the boundaries of their prison yet.
When the walls are brought in closer, you may yet feel them, but of course, it is too late - because you are in prison and went there willingly because it felt safer than the 'big wide world'.
"Yes, this was a loan that they have paid back (in part)"
I'm guessing that the people objecting didn't actually rtfa. Most loans require payback in installments, so the remainder of the balance (plus interest) is what they just paid back.
You seem to be dragging down the average IQ on this site all on your lonesome (plus the others that don't understand that advancing a new technology means economies of scale and cheaper designs in the long-run).
"The FBI argue the net is “going dark” to them, thanks to encryption technologies which render valid wiretapping warrants useless."
Perhaps they shouldn't have abused the power so much that encryption has become widespread to the point where my Mum has heard about it and knows how to use it.
"Wing said all signals are always sent via two geographically diverse paths to customers"
Are they still touting that old bullshit.
They've been selling this for years and occasionally still come a cropper when some tit on the underground cuts through a bearer cable, then all those supposed 'diverse routes' suddenly seem to go down at once - odd that.
I met a female in the networking security field that could give anyone a good run for their money - when I asked her why she wasn't contracting it was basically down to fear - she couldn't handle the idea that she might be out of work for a couple of months without notice.
It certainly wasn't down to lack of skills and flexibility.
" I remember our chemistry teacher chucking a decent sized rock of sodium into the beck to demonstrate why we should be careful with it."
Hehe, we did the same, except the teacher used a pea sized piece of sodium, but then got called out of the class for something, leaving the oil wrapped sodium block behind :) Nee dI say more? Well, just a little then, the ceiling tiles needed replacing.
As far as this 'bottle explosion' goes, I've seen the reaction you can get with a bottle of coke and some mintoe's (sp?) - this hardly sounds like it should even register as much as a banger.
Bullshit.
When I was young, and poor, I used to crack games (not just get them from others either).
As soon as I was earning decent money, I bought games.
Where does that put your little 'theory'.
"invent a system that makes pirating game impossible"
Only if it's literally individually coded to your DNA, and then you can give a copy to your clone :)
"So why are employing incompetent to write our tax legislation?"
We aren't, we employ consultants from leading tax companies (like Delloitte and KPMG) and then people wonder where all the loopholes come from when these companies set up new avoidance schemes.
It would require the combined will of the people to change this, and they're mostly illiterate, innumerate TV absorbers, so I wouldn't count on it happening any time soon. MP's complaining about this sort of stuff are being disingenious to the point of blurting out that we need a morality tax or something equally ludicrous.
Phorn = Phorm
and if these meetings are what is being suggested, then I would be surpised to see Zen on the list.
A lot of techies use Zen and if they got wind of something underhanded they'd abandon ship - I would.