Re: Not so fast...
So how the hell am I going to play a Blu-Ray disc from a tablet?
5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
So if I understand this correctly the bad guys took advantage of a payment system that had no checks or balances, or comebacks, or protection - and the general public liked it BECAUSE of this?
I find it more surprising that such a system exists that people trusted than that some bad guys decided to rip it off. As far as I can tell they have just effectively performed a public service* for slightly less cost than the banks would charge you (and the banks wouldn't even highlight the flaws in a shit system).
*Only once it was discovered of course :)
"if they are considered reasonable"
If they restrict the use of knowledge gained from the previous employer then that's reasonable. Saying someone can't work for a living in the field in which he is qualified is not reasonable.
However, if the contract stated that they would continue to be paid a retainer for 6 months after they finished so they wouldn't work for a competitor, then that would be fair.
So, diode, great. What about semi-light-passing materials?
How do you apply this to getting a working transistor?
I would have thought they would also be trying to use light re-combination/diffraction.
Eg. Blue light passing through diode, apply red light to gate, green light exits from diode :)
"This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy against spam, scams and commercially deceptive content. "
Ah, here it is..
You can't expect ever increasing complexity without the addition of vulnerabilities.
One way to secure a service on the net would be to simplify the access regarding what you can or cannot do, and the implement a true proxy (such as the old, extremely hard to manage yet effective Gauntlet firewalls).
The proxy in this sense doesn't just create a connection for you, it will not perform any tasks that are not specifically programmed in to it, and you should be able to re-configure it yourself (i.e. no black-box solution) and possibly allow the code to be opened up for public scrutiny.
The problem with this approach is that you won't be able to access facebook through it. Did I say problem? Carry on :)
I love El Reg, I've been coming here for years, and probably will keep doing so.
However, I have to accept the truth..
"Nevilles commentary"
Was that the guy that said everything with the same rhythm and intonation no-matter what he said? The bloke that made me want to throw the remote into the TV? That one?
Mind you, it got me wondering if they would ever transmit multiple sound channels, one of the crowd, one of the commentators etc. (or a choice of commentators) then you could switch the wankers off and just watch the game but keep the crowd response. That would be nice.
And another thing, why don't you get closer pictures of the game whilst the ball is in play anymore? I used to watch football and you'd feel part of the game, now you might as well be watching someone play FIFA 2013 or something.
I have a real problem understanding any kind of 'position' held by Gnosticism. I thought it was supposed to be about self knowledge, or rather learning from personal experience, rather than having any kind of doctrine. Am I wrong?
"quite adequately dressed"
iirc Einstein had many sets of identical clothing so that he didn't have to spend any thought on what to wear. So whilst he may have expended a modicum of thought on the 'set' of clothes chosen, he did so so that he could safely ignore the subject forever more. I suppose Einstein was just a progressive Boffin in that sense, but he still wasn't interested.
" He even induced arts students to voluntarily attend theoretical physics lectures, an awesone achievment."
I used to train ISP sales staff on what the internet was and what they should (and shouldn't) be selling as a product.
I managed to convert two of them into support engineers such was their interest in the detail - does that count? :)
Whilst the Pyke should obviously be used to measure true Boffinry and the deciPyke for everyday Boffins, the milliPyke should be retained for those with a hint of Boffinry but are, at heart, fairly normal and can dress themselves without attracting undue attention..
"I reckon I must have measured at least 3 milli-Pykes today when I came up with that method of transferring tomatoes across the canteen with a catapult and quad-copter combo"
There should also be a negative scale, perhaps with an inverse logarithmic correlation - we could call it a Bimboid perhaps?
They must certainly have a shed to 'potter in' over the weekend, so that they can 'knock something up' like a new form a jet engine or something (as in "Monday morning at the lab: Mr Boffin- Hey Gerald, come and have a look at this doobrey I knocked up over the weekend and see what you think"). What follows will probably a complete catastrophe of business sense (if they are British) and eventually some shark from the US will see it's potential, buy it and apply some solid business sense to it to start the next revolution in the application of science.
I think it's mostly about attitude.
If someone is really really clever and has lots of degrees and *knows* everything in the text books they are not a boffin, unless..
they think outside the box, aren't afraid of looking stupid and have a healthy disrespect for 'form before content'.
They can be a lot of different things, but 'normal' isn't one of them. That's essential.
Whilst the fears about future governments are valid, I think the real risk is now.
No government changes 100% personnel with a change of winner at general election time - government is run by the civil servants and they are lifers.
The biggest risk in my opinion is the gradual change of attitude overall. If someone with power gets away with something that should have been stopped, it sends a subtle message to others in similar positions.
If they are of a similar ilk then it gives them a green light to do it themselves.
If they aren't bothered either way, they will continue to be not bothered.
If it bothers them and they perceive that the system won't allow them to do anything about it (attitudes towards whistle blowers for example) then it can lead to defeatism and the turning of blind eyes.
It is the last group that empowers the first group and can create a powerful feedback loop. If we want to break this kind of cycle we need to ensure that the first group are actually prevented from performing such actions or punished when they transgress - and the only way to do that is to have enough oversight and threat to act as a preventative and to hold people personally accountable for their actions.
Power corrupts, but it doesn't do so in one fell swoop. The experiments using the prisoner/guard setups show us what people are really like and how even the people who object to such extreme behavior become sidelined.
"if he had turned back at the first refusal (France) then he could have made it back to Russia on the fuel they had left."
Ok, I didn't realise that.
"Forced down is a very emotive term"
Agreed. Not intentionally used to add drama but re-reading my post it does imply the use of fighters etc. due to common parlance.
"I think it was more of a case they wanted to make it clear to Snowjob and his supporters that he would not be allowed to just bolt for cover"
I think we'll have to agree to differ on that one. Speculating as to what might or might not have happened if Snowden had been found on the plane is just that, speculation. You might be correct, it's certainly not impossible for their motives to be as you describe (especially if they *knew* he wasn't on the plane) but if he was there I think the scenario would have played out quite differently - but that's my opinion.
"Morales and co made much political hay from the event but the jet was not 'forced down' and nothing 'illegal' was involved, all the authorities concerned were well within their legal rights."
Force doesn't have to be applied at the point of a gun. Refusing the aircraft permission to pass through various territories had the net effect of making them land where they didn't want or plan to, that's being forced. I didn't say they did it with military jets and gesitculating airforce pilots.
Whilst their actions weren't illegal, it was because they thought Snowden was onboard - which was exactly my point. They went to a great deal of effort to get hold of him, and failed.
"Something all the tin hatters on here might bear in mind."
I seem to recall something about a flight being forced down because they thought Snowden was onboard. That suggests to me that they were just not quick enough off the mark, rather than not trying.
I also think that "Tin hatters" might end up being less and less of a derogatory remark as time goes by.
Whilst I wouldn't go near the cloud and thought it was a bad idea from the very start, I have on occasion worked for SME's who have struggled to have anyone permanent to manage their data storage and security.
However, they will have business broadband, so all their jewels are effectively exposed.
In those circumstances, a well managed cloud service would be more secure than what they currently have.