* Posts by Sir Runcible Spoon

5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007

David Cameron: I'm off to the US to get my bro Barack to ban crypto – report

Sir Runcible Spoon

Loads of lolly?

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Basically he's declaring war on private conversation

"a mathematically-enforced 100-year embargo on the recordings.

I'm not a mathematician, but I'm not aware of any way of accomplishing that."

You could always encrypt the data and not store the key, then spend the next 100 years trying to break it.

Sir Runcible Spoon

but only the fox will reply

Sir Runcible Spoon
Thumb Up

Re: David Cameron

Wow, that arrived with the accent and sneer and everything. +1

Demon Internet goes TITSUP: Outage borks ancient ISP

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Alternate Routes

That's all very well, but most ISP's still use BT to backhaul their data.

Lots of people were very upset when someone cut through a bearer carrying 120 fiber lines during the upgrade to the Jubilee line. Lots of them had paid for diverse routes you see.

It's a myth.

What do UK and Iran have in common? Both want to outlaw encrypted apps

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Many years ago experts warned

How about anonymous postings of PGP encrypted messages onto Usenet. Job done.

I know that's electronic, but it's an absurdly simple way to bypass any encryption restrictions (until they ban the use of computers completely).

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Politicians will come into power completely at the mercy of the police and secret police.

"But then she can block things if she really insisted, perhaps we do need to go to the top?"

I was thinking the same thing. After all, it is 'Her' Majesty's Government.

We might want to lay off on the technical terms though - perhaps we can make some kind of Corgi/Shooting analogy to get the point across?

Sir Runcible Spoon
Flame

Re: Good luck Dave

We can only expect any improvement if we can vote in a political party that is prepared to take on the Whitehall mandarins - and we have to support them through all the roadblocks that will be put up in front of them to take them down via trial by media.

Likely? I won't be holding my breath.

Preserve the concinnity of English, caterwauls American university

Sir Runcible Spoon
Facepalm

Re: Obambulate...

Except Bambi was a Deer of course! (I knew that)

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: There... completed the assignment and used them all.

Yeah, you gotta love it when someone else doesn't understand the words you use and they make out that you're the stupid one. Love 'em.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Obambulate...

Obambilate - to walk with sheep?

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Sesquipedalian Bollocks.

"You had me at bloviating."

Seconded. Although I will accept new words happily if they are presented in the correct spirit. I refer, of course, to a recent posting by one commentard who provided a wonderful set of imagery which included a punishment of 'mild-carping' (to have a wet fish applied to the chops in a not-particularly malicious manner, but enough to get the point across that you had it coming). At least that was how I interpreted it. Lacking a dictionary reference I felt free to apply a little poetic license.

Sir Runcible Spoon
Holmes

Re: There... completed the assignment and used them all.

"Philistine is more than vaguely racist."

Only if you conflate it with Palestine, otherwise who is there to be offended?

I gave up on proper words years ago when a group of people looked at me as if I were an alien for using the word 'effervescent'. None of them knew what it meant. I was further disquieted upon discovering that none of the attendant group understood the word after I explained what it meant.

However, I am prepared to be lambasted for poor educational methods rather than cynically ascribing negative mental attributes to the aforementioned group of x-tards.

In the words of Dr. Johnson's nemesis:- I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.

Also, I believe 'melange' imparts more an understanding of 'blending' rather than a simple, crude, 'mix'. :)

BlackBerry Enterprise chief: Yes, we did leave users behind

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: They're still in deep trouble

"and I really don't see how they'll get over it."

perhaps they will ditch the phones and push the infrastructure side of things, using a RIM SIM in your Android phone via a secure network.

It might work.

Peers warn against rushing 'enhanced' DATA SLURP powers through Parliament

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Unfortunately...

If only it was, at least the Borg only kept that which made them stronger.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: The twits twit

"There will come a time "

You need to catch up with the current state of affairs a little bit here.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Making hay

They do find needles in haystacks, they just keep putting them back in.

What the security services really need is more bodies to keep track of the ne'er-do-wells.

Paris terror attacks: ISPs face pressure to share MORE data with governments

Sir Runcible Spoon

"I think that a fora such as this is no plaice for such comments"

Codswallop.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Well it is expected

"1. Attackers were known to the security forces"

You forgot "0. Create circumstances for extremism to flourish'

Hawking and friends: Artificial Intelligence 'must do what we want it to do'

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Oxymoron...

Considering how many of the great unwashed appear to be told what to do by the TV/Media/Government etc. then can we assume that they are not intelligent either?

That could lead to some interesting conclusions.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: All beginning to take on a 'Drama Queen' tone...

Considering that we don't have the foggiest idea what 'consciousness' is, how can we know if we create it accidentally in a 'hmm, that's odd' experiment?

""Our AI systems must do what we want them to do," it said."

No, they must NOT do what we DON'T want them to do.

That's much more important imho

Tax Systems: The good, the bad and the completely toot toot ding-dong loopy

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: nice in theory

Well, they do say you learn something new every day - I can go back to bed now :)

Sir Runcible Spoon
Joke

Re: nice in theory

"Surface mount?"

You know that things aren't stuck on to the surface with glue right? ;)

SURPRISE: Norks' Linux distro has security vulns

Sir Runcible Spoon
Meh

Re: WTF?

And if this happens to be the only OS someone in NK can get hold of, and they might be unfavourably disposed to the NK regime, shouldn't we give them a hand in securing their OS from their spying government?

After all, we are doing the same to try and stop our own government.

BILL GATES DRINKS 'boiled and treated' POO. Ah, 'delicious'

Sir Runcible Spoon
Headmaster

Saying it was delicious doesn't impart any reference to taste, odour or colour, just that he enjoyed it.

Tor pedo torpedoed: Ex-US cybersecurity guru jailed for 25 years in abuse pics sting

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Disappointing.

The cream also rises to the top, but it soon goes off.

Dark matter-hunting boffins spot EXCITING signal in X-ray spectrum

Sir Runcible Spoon
Coat

Re: Speaking of EXCITING signals

"They will put it on a no-flight list."

That won't stop it!

Snowden leaks lack context says security studies professor

Sir Runcible Spoon
Thumb Up

On the other hand..

even if the information in the slides isn't 100% accurate and is only intended for higher-ups - it still reveals the mindset of the organisation and what is considered acceptable practice.

So even if a slide says 'we managed to obtain meta-data on 95% of all mobile calls in 2013' - it doesn't matter if the number is accurate - the intention is still there and there is almost certainly an effort to obtain 100% of the that meta-data.

Good article though, it raises some good points.

Elite:Dangerous goes TITSUP

Sir Runcible Spoon
Thumb Up

I'd heard about Voiceattack (and OR obviously) but I had never heard of the Leapmotion thingymabob - +10 upvotes for that if I could.

Sir Runcible Spoon
FAIL

Re: I've been thinking about playing.... @Blinky

@Justicesays: I had no idea about that until you mentioned it. I've just looked it up and it appears that quite a few of the keyboard controls (including the one you are referring to) involves freezing the game first.

I think I would rather plough into the side of a space station than constantly take myself out of the game to make it 0.1% easier :)

Also, it isn't compulsory (once lined up properly) to go in at full speed to make that method work - that's just how I roll baby!

Sir Runcible Spoon
Coat

Re: Only had a single problem myself...

and you weren't attacked by Thargoids? Were they off-line at the time or something?

Sir Runcible Spoon
Coat

Re: I've been thinking about playing.... @Blinky

What was hard about docking in Elite?

You flew with the station to your left (or right) and the planet to your right (or left).

Open up the left (or right) view and waited until the space station was in the middle of your screen. Stop, turn to face station, engage full thrust and perform the rotate bungee manouvre and all is good.

Seriously, anyone who couldn't do that shouldn't be flying a spaceship in the first place!

UK.gov: Sod SIGINT, let's turn GCHQ into a TECH CRECHE

Sir Runcible Spoon
Facepalm

Re: How many Chief Security Officer already came from law enforcement agencies?

"have their product built-in backdoors to let their "ex" employer access your data?"

Oh, you mean products like Checkpoint and Palo Alto firewalls?

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: The difference...

""That's going to be a real problem, all those people are commie faggots.""

What about the ones who aren't working for Russia?

Want to shoot FIREBALLS from your wrists, SPIDER-MAN style?

Sir Runcible Spoon
Alert

..and that's no ordinary rabbit!

Sony-blasting Lizard Squad suspects quizzed by UK and Finnish cops

Sir Runcible Spoon
Meh

"UK police have arrested a suspected member"

Chickens, hatched, count 'em....or not.

El Reg Redesign - leave your comment here.

Sir Runcible Spoon
Paris Hilton

Re: Incremental improvement

So, what DID you do to earn that Gold badge Trev? :)

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Oh for goodness sake

"I've already almost stopped noticing the changes in layout"

I wish I could say the same. I've given it a while to try and get used to it but it just isn't happening.

Funny thing about pubs, a few of the locals that I knew in my youth (that I stopped going to once they had their souls ripped out with a re-furb) have had more changes of management than I can count and are looking decidedly ratty these days (and not in a care-worn kind of way).

What those pubs forgot is that when they alienated the 10-15 regular drinkers to attract a more well-heeled clientele, they forgot about the tides of fashion and how quickly they can leave you high and dry. Those regulars (from one particular pub I know about) ended up patronizing another of the local pubs (not quite as nice as the original, but still has that care-worn feel to it). That pub is still going strong.

I'm not so egotistical that I believe I have a say in how the Reg presents itself, or generates it's cash to keep running, nor am I ignorant of the resistance to change that most people feel. I do, however, have experience of how easily a reputation can be lost, never to be recovered, when the hard-core of a site that makes it so vibrant and attractive to visit is alienated to the point where they drift off to other corners of the web.

For all I know getting rid of the current crowd of hooligans would be the best thing that the Reg has ever done - it may get a different set of loyal readers that actually see that adverts (let alone click on them!) - I'm not convinced though.

Sir Runcible Spoon
Coat

Re: No "News" would be good news.

"Loose the News" and let slip the dogs of media?

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Oh for goodness sake

@JDX - If people didn't care so much, they wouldn't take the time to complain (in their droves it seems).

If you are advocating that people should care less, then doesn't that have a knock-on effect to the (legendary) loyalties of the El Reg readership?

You know what they say, be careful what you ask for.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: Marathon Bar

Although our 'Marathon' was actually called 'Snickers' everywhere else but the UK if I recall - we were the odd one's out there. Not a like for like comparison :)

Space Commanders lock missiles on Elite's Frontier Devs

Sir Runcible Spoon
Thumb Up

Re: Trickier than docking with a space station without a docking computer?

If you want to see how easy it is to cock-up a docking procedure in E:D, watch the following review..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmcHLv7bAjQ

It's also hilarious :) Someone should give this guy a job.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: You tell me,

"The campaign was launched as an online game and offline was added after a short while due to overwhelming feedback and requests."

Ok, you have a point there.

I haven't followed all of the developments intimately, but I have kept my ear to the ground a bit - and what I was hearing was that the offline single player mode had a stronger following than the online ever-changing universe mode did. To me that should have sent a very clear message to Braben.

Also, whilst we are on the subject of Braben, why did anyone think it was a good idea to put him in front of a camera to give an interview? He is a PR disaster!

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: This was going to be my first

Thanks for pointing out Limit Theory

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tPdbLe3zx0

The procedural generation aspect is pretty cool, but I have my doubts around the game itself, mostly due to wanting my space-sim to be an OR experience first and foremost.

This game seems to have quite a bit of mouse/keyboard usage, plus the 3rd person/1st person view doesn't feel like you are politing a spaceship. I think I read somewhere that they were going to put in a static cockpit view, but I haven't seen it yet so cannot comment.

I know the game is, as yet, not optimised - but I am a little concerned about the amount of pop-up that I was seeing in the latest update video (see link above). Nothing would annoy me more than to be taken out of the experience and reminded that it was a game than having objects appear/disappear instantly, rather than a gradual fade in/out with distance.

Still, early days so it will definitely be one to watch on the game premise alone.

Sir Runcible Spoon
Facepalm

Re: I don't understand the problem...

I think you've missed the point by several AU's my friend.

Sir Runcible Spoon
FAIL

Re: You tell me,

" that doesn't give you any sort of right to your money back if the scope of the project is changed"

I'm aware of the KS philosophy of it being a bit of a gamble and all that, but if you aren't wrong then you should be. After all, where is the line drawn?

What if he decided to change the scope to make it a platform game instead? Where is the line that says 'you can change the scope this much, but no more'?

People wanted an updated elite, not a version of Eve online with dogfights, so I can understand why they are a bit miffed. Single player first, multiplayer second (imho) is what I think investors were expecting. I think he got it the wrong way round by focusing on multiplayer first and creating a dynamic universe that needs to be updated from central servers. If the single player was looking empty, then they should have bloody well filled it.

Sir Runcible Spoon

Re: I'll stick to the Classic thank you...

I recently played Odyssey 3011 on the xbox 360, and although you kind of run out of steam a bit once everything is upgraded and you can galaxy hop to your hearts content it was fun getting there.

Although once you are full kitted out, it's easier to get around if you are public enemy #1 since the cops only come at you one at a time. It also makes it simpler to make money -just buy as much Narcotics as you can at cheap places (you will never fill the hold). When you run out of money, sell it somewhere expensive and you will suddenly find you have nothing to spend your money on :( It could do with more complex missions etc. but otherwise excellent value and true (in spirit) to the original.

Sir Runcible Spoon

"I saw one guy complaining that it wasn't the same as the X series and that there was nothing to do in the game !!!"

I don't think the X-Series supports the OR yet though does it? I heard that they have implemented a cockpit view, so they are half-way there :)

Security SEE-SAW: $3 MEEELLION needed to fight a $100k hack

Sir Runcible Spoon
Boffin

Sir

In my experience it is one thing for a company to pay for, and deploy, a set of complex security products that combine to give a good view of what is happening on the network, where the gaps are and first line response tools etc.

It is quite another to make those tools work. By which, I don't mean just keeping the boxes up and running, but actually using the intelligence the tools provide in a constructive manner to secure the borders etc., especially in a large and complex organisation with many different trust zones.

Most of these large companies are buying this stuff to defend their crown jewels, but forget that their support models are all based on volume & 24/7 response time type SLA's etc. when what these types of products need is a Rolls Royce support solution that hasn't been fashionable in IT for nearly 20 years.

It requires a combination of product expertise and knowledge of the environment. Add to this a focus on the task at hand (rather than being a part time 'focus' group or whatever) and enough bodies that if someone leaves it doesn't leave a massive knowledge gap in your defences.

The business procedures also need to be aligned to allow the (hopefully properly tuned) alerts to get to the right people in the right kind of time-frame to make a difference to the response and how effective it will be.

None of this is cookie-cutter stuff, and the quality of people required to do all this properly for a set of 6 or 7 interwoven security tools means it is hard to achieve without some form of internal training from the people who know.

At the end of the day, to do the job properly it costs an awful lot of money (not just the equipment, licenses and support) to keep the engine tuned and working efficiently, money which is hard to come by on an on-going basis (as opposed to the upfront costs of setting it all up).

Unless you are a critical infrastructure provider, or a defense department skunk unit, it is probably more money than can readily be justified.

In the end most of this stuff ends up as shelf-ware, sitting in the network with no-one looking after it (or even looking at it) - which means all that up-front money was wasted.

A lot of companies buy the stuff without realising the support commitment involved. Just one of these products can be a bitch to maintain, bundle a whole load together and you are asking for trouble unless you know what you are about.