Loads of lolly?
Posts by Sir Runcible Spoon
5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
Page:
- ← Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- Next →
David Cameron: I'm off to the US to get my bro Barack to ban crypto – report
Re: Basically he's declaring war on private conversation
"a mathematically-enforced 100-year embargo on the recordings.
I'm not a mathematician, but I'm not aware of any way of accomplishing that."
You could always encrypt the data and not store the key, then spend the next 100 years trying to break it.
Demon Internet goes TITSUP: Outage borks ancient ISP
What do UK and Iran have in common? Both want to outlaw encrypted apps
Re: Politicians will come into power completely at the mercy of the police and secret police.
"But then she can block things if she really insisted, perhaps we do need to go to the top?"
I was thinking the same thing. After all, it is 'Her' Majesty's Government.
We might want to lay off on the technical terms though - perhaps we can make some kind of Corgi/Shooting analogy to get the point across?
Re: Good luck Dave
We can only expect any improvement if we can vote in a political party that is prepared to take on the Whitehall mandarins - and we have to support them through all the roadblocks that will be put up in front of them to take them down via trial by media.
Likely? I won't be holding my breath.
Preserve the concinnity of English, caterwauls American university
Re: Sesquipedalian Bollocks.
"You had me at bloviating."
Seconded. Although I will accept new words happily if they are presented in the correct spirit. I refer, of course, to a recent posting by one commentard who provided a wonderful set of imagery which included a punishment of 'mild-carping' (to have a wet fish applied to the chops in a not-particularly malicious manner, but enough to get the point across that you had it coming). At least that was how I interpreted it. Lacking a dictionary reference I felt free to apply a little poetic license.
Re: There... completed the assignment and used them all.
"Philistine is more than vaguely racist."
Only if you conflate it with Palestine, otherwise who is there to be offended?
I gave up on proper words years ago when a group of people looked at me as if I were an alien for using the word 'effervescent'. None of them knew what it meant. I was further disquieted upon discovering that none of the attendant group understood the word after I explained what it meant.
However, I am prepared to be lambasted for poor educational methods rather than cynically ascribing negative mental attributes to the aforementioned group of x-tards.
In the words of Dr. Johnson's nemesis:- I'm anispeptic, frasmotic, even compunctuous to have caused you such pericombobulation.
Also, I believe 'melange' imparts more an understanding of 'blending' rather than a simple, crude, 'mix'. :)
BlackBerry Enterprise chief: Yes, we did leave users behind
Peers warn against rushing 'enhanced' DATA SLURP powers through Parliament
Paris terror attacks: ISPs face pressure to share MORE data with governments
Hawking and friends: Artificial Intelligence 'must do what we want it to do'
Re: All beginning to take on a 'Drama Queen' tone...
Considering that we don't have the foggiest idea what 'consciousness' is, how can we know if we create it accidentally in a 'hmm, that's odd' experiment?
""Our AI systems must do what we want them to do," it said."
No, they must NOT do what we DON'T want them to do.
That's much more important imho
Tax Systems: The good, the bad and the completely toot toot ding-dong loopy
SURPRISE: Norks' Linux distro has security vulns
BILL GATES DRINKS 'boiled and treated' POO. Ah, 'delicious'
Tor pedo torpedoed: Ex-US cybersecurity guru jailed for 25 years in abuse pics sting
Dark matter-hunting boffins spot EXCITING signal in X-ray spectrum
Snowden leaks lack context says security studies professor
On the other hand..
even if the information in the slides isn't 100% accurate and is only intended for higher-ups - it still reveals the mindset of the organisation and what is considered acceptable practice.
So even if a slide says 'we managed to obtain meta-data on 95% of all mobile calls in 2013' - it doesn't matter if the number is accurate - the intention is still there and there is almost certainly an effort to obtain 100% of the that meta-data.
Good article though, it raises some good points.
Elite:Dangerous goes TITSUP
Re: I've been thinking about playing.... @Blinky
@Justicesays: I had no idea about that until you mentioned it. I've just looked it up and it appears that quite a few of the keyboard controls (including the one you are referring to) involves freezing the game first.
I think I would rather plough into the side of a space station than constantly take myself out of the game to make it 0.1% easier :)
Also, it isn't compulsory (once lined up properly) to go in at full speed to make that method work - that's just how I roll baby!
Re: I've been thinking about playing.... @Blinky
What was hard about docking in Elite?
You flew with the station to your left (or right) and the planet to your right (or left).
Open up the left (or right) view and waited until the space station was in the middle of your screen. Stop, turn to face station, engage full thrust and perform the rotate bungee manouvre and all is good.
Seriously, anyone who couldn't do that shouldn't be flying a spaceship in the first place!
UK.gov: Sod SIGINT, let's turn GCHQ into a TECH CRECHE
Want to shoot FIREBALLS from your wrists, SPIDER-MAN style?
Sony-blasting Lizard Squad suspects quizzed by UK and Finnish cops
El Reg Redesign - leave your comment here.
Re: Oh for goodness sake
"I've already almost stopped noticing the changes in layout"
I wish I could say the same. I've given it a while to try and get used to it but it just isn't happening.
Funny thing about pubs, a few of the locals that I knew in my youth (that I stopped going to once they had their souls ripped out with a re-furb) have had more changes of management than I can count and are looking decidedly ratty these days (and not in a care-worn kind of way).
What those pubs forgot is that when they alienated the 10-15 regular drinkers to attract a more well-heeled clientele, they forgot about the tides of fashion and how quickly they can leave you high and dry. Those regulars (from one particular pub I know about) ended up patronizing another of the local pubs (not quite as nice as the original, but still has that care-worn feel to it). That pub is still going strong.
I'm not so egotistical that I believe I have a say in how the Reg presents itself, or generates it's cash to keep running, nor am I ignorant of the resistance to change that most people feel. I do, however, have experience of how easily a reputation can be lost, never to be recovered, when the hard-core of a site that makes it so vibrant and attractive to visit is alienated to the point where they drift off to other corners of the web.
For all I know getting rid of the current crowd of hooligans would be the best thing that the Reg has ever done - it may get a different set of loyal readers that actually see that adverts (let alone click on them!) - I'm not convinced though.
Re: Oh for goodness sake
@JDX - If people didn't care so much, they wouldn't take the time to complain (in their droves it seems).
If you are advocating that people should care less, then doesn't that have a knock-on effect to the (legendary) loyalties of the El Reg readership?
You know what they say, be careful what you ask for.
Space Commanders lock missiles on Elite's Frontier Devs
Re: You tell me,
"The campaign was launched as an online game and offline was added after a short while due to overwhelming feedback and requests."
Ok, you have a point there.
I haven't followed all of the developments intimately, but I have kept my ear to the ground a bit - and what I was hearing was that the offline single player mode had a stronger following than the online ever-changing universe mode did. To me that should have sent a very clear message to Braben.
Also, whilst we are on the subject of Braben, why did anyone think it was a good idea to put him in front of a camera to give an interview? He is a PR disaster!
Re: This was going to be my first
Thanks for pointing out Limit Theory
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tPdbLe3zx0
The procedural generation aspect is pretty cool, but I have my doubts around the game itself, mostly due to wanting my space-sim to be an OR experience first and foremost.
This game seems to have quite a bit of mouse/keyboard usage, plus the 3rd person/1st person view doesn't feel like you are politing a spaceship. I think I read somewhere that they were going to put in a static cockpit view, but I haven't seen it yet so cannot comment.
I know the game is, as yet, not optimised - but I am a little concerned about the amount of pop-up that I was seeing in the latest update video (see link above). Nothing would annoy me more than to be taken out of the experience and reminded that it was a game than having objects appear/disappear instantly, rather than a gradual fade in/out with distance.
Still, early days so it will definitely be one to watch on the game premise alone.
Re: You tell me,
" that doesn't give you any sort of right to your money back if the scope of the project is changed"
I'm aware of the KS philosophy of it being a bit of a gamble and all that, but if you aren't wrong then you should be. After all, where is the line drawn?
What if he decided to change the scope to make it a platform game instead? Where is the line that says 'you can change the scope this much, but no more'?
People wanted an updated elite, not a version of Eve online with dogfights, so I can understand why they are a bit miffed. Single player first, multiplayer second (imho) is what I think investors were expecting. I think he got it the wrong way round by focusing on multiplayer first and creating a dynamic universe that needs to be updated from central servers. If the single player was looking empty, then they should have bloody well filled it.
Re: I'll stick to the Classic thank you...
I recently played Odyssey 3011 on the xbox 360, and although you kind of run out of steam a bit once everything is upgraded and you can galaxy hop to your hearts content it was fun getting there.
Although once you are full kitted out, it's easier to get around if you are public enemy #1 since the cops only come at you one at a time. It also makes it simpler to make money -just buy as much Narcotics as you can at cheap places (you will never fill the hold). When you run out of money, sell it somewhere expensive and you will suddenly find you have nothing to spend your money on :( It could do with more complex missions etc. but otherwise excellent value and true (in spirit) to the original.
Security SEE-SAW: $3 MEEELLION needed to fight a $100k hack
Sir
In my experience it is one thing for a company to pay for, and deploy, a set of complex security products that combine to give a good view of what is happening on the network, where the gaps are and first line response tools etc.
It is quite another to make those tools work. By which, I don't mean just keeping the boxes up and running, but actually using the intelligence the tools provide in a constructive manner to secure the borders etc., especially in a large and complex organisation with many different trust zones.
Most of these large companies are buying this stuff to defend their crown jewels, but forget that their support models are all based on volume & 24/7 response time type SLA's etc. when what these types of products need is a Rolls Royce support solution that hasn't been fashionable in IT for nearly 20 years.
It requires a combination of product expertise and knowledge of the environment. Add to this a focus on the task at hand (rather than being a part time 'focus' group or whatever) and enough bodies that if someone leaves it doesn't leave a massive knowledge gap in your defences.
The business procedures also need to be aligned to allow the (hopefully properly tuned) alerts to get to the right people in the right kind of time-frame to make a difference to the response and how effective it will be.
None of this is cookie-cutter stuff, and the quality of people required to do all this properly for a set of 6 or 7 interwoven security tools means it is hard to achieve without some form of internal training from the people who know.
At the end of the day, to do the job properly it costs an awful lot of money (not just the equipment, licenses and support) to keep the engine tuned and working efficiently, money which is hard to come by on an on-going basis (as opposed to the upfront costs of setting it all up).
Unless you are a critical infrastructure provider, or a defense department skunk unit, it is probably more money than can readily be justified.
In the end most of this stuff ends up as shelf-ware, sitting in the network with no-one looking after it (or even looking at it) - which means all that up-front money was wasted.
A lot of companies buy the stuff without realising the support commitment involved. Just one of these products can be a bitch to maintain, bundle a whole load together and you are asking for trouble unless you know what you are about.
Page:
- ← Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 32
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- 38
- 39
- 40
- 41
- 42
- 43
- 44
- 45
- 46
- 47
- 48
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 54
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- 60
- 61
- 62
- 63
- 64
- 65
- 66
- 67
- 68
- 69
- 70
- 71
- 72
- 73
- 74
- 75
- 76
- 77
- 78
- 79
- 80
- 81
- 82
- 83
- 84
- 85
- 86
- 87
- 88
- 89
- 90
- 91
- 92
- 93
- 94
- 95
- 96
- 97
- 98
- 99
- 100
- 101
- 102
- 103
- 104
- 105
- 106
- 107
- 108
- 109
- 110
- 111
- 112
- 113
- 114
- 115
- 116
- Next →