Re: estimated net "benefit" of £5.7bn by 2020
Having a meter that provides a reading remotely is one thing; someone else having remote control over my supply via a 'Smart' meter is not.
Remember folks - they aren't compulsory!
5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
Let's just say, for arguments sake, that GCHQ were interested in taking someone down without showing their working etc.
They call up their friends in Langley, who hack the target, plant some CP or wotnot. Then the police get a tip-off from GCHQ about the target having CP.
Police raid the target and he gets to be tried as a peadophile. Is there anything in this chain of events that the defence could question? Or is the guilty verdict a foregone conclusion at this point?
"How do you think the big fella feels about that?"
I often find that Christians haven't really thought about their religion at all. For instance, when I ask them what religion they think Jesus of Nazareth was they look a bit stunned. The knock-out blow is when I say 'well, he certainly wasn't a Christian was he?'.
He was a Gnostic* - as was Muhammad.
*Obviously he was born Jewish though.
If you are only trying to avoid mass surveillance pretty much any vpn will do. There will always be a need for targeted surveillance, and as long as it requires an effort and has some oversight then I'm prepared to put up with it.
It's this 'Collect everything, from everyone' aspect that just about anyone in the public sector will be able to view that I object to - it's just to damned easy to abuse this kind of power.
Just keep moving yourself above that low bar and avoid doing things that will attract *serious* attention and this becomes a war of attrition. It's always been a lot easier to make things harder than it is to make things easier, so we should manage to stay ahead of the game*.
*This assumes they don't make encrypted traffic illegal of course. It would be totally idiotic and financially suicidal to do so, but I still wouldn't put it past them to actually try.
"Its called "Catch-22". If you disclose you don't get the job. If you don't disclose then you get nailed for failing to disclose."
Disclosing a (spent) criminal conviction should not bar you from a job unless the conviction was related to the job somehow (e.g. child molester working at a school, or an armed robber working for g4s...oh wait).
The problem is that it often does stop people getting jobs, which means they have better option by going back to being a criminal.
"You might find the following of interest:"
That's truly amazing! I have only had time to read about 1/2 way through that page so far, but I can already see how important that research could be - I wonder how long it will be before we start seeing the Triffid farms ;)
@Pompous Git, thanks for the link.
Just for the record, I entered into my studies of Alchemy with a healthy dose of skepticism, and I have still yet to prove anything for myself, but there is a degree of consistency in the way the gibberish that is alchemical literature builds and opens up new insights to make sense of something that was previously nonsensical.
As a result, I have an open mind on the subject and will be conducting my own experiments in due course, just like a proper scientist ;)
"I'm sorry your honour, I cannot provide the password to those encrypted files that were found on my computer. Have you consider that they were put there by the FBI as part of a general round-up of people they didn't like this week?"
"No. See you in 2 years when I will ask you again."
""Shared" (even locked cage) is co-lo."
Yes, that's technically true, but it does mean random passers by cannot just get physical access to the kit, it also means no-one else is using that kit either.
How many banks are you aware of that actually *own* their own data centers? I'll give you a clue - none.
Why don't you look up who the customers are at the L3 DC on Leman street.
Doesn't this mean that UK goods are now more attractive to overseas buyers? That should be good news for the few things that are still manufactured here, but it should mean that more manufacturing gets done here (for things where the materials can be sourced locally anyway).
And are they making a profit as they originally promised it would, or is this all just another exercise in regulating our economy into the ground?
What I don't know is if I am somehow deemed to be an 'employee' and wotnot, does the company/agency I am working with have to pay their side of things too? (Such as pension contributions and holiday/sick pay etc.).
VR is very real and completely immersing. There are times when you might not want that, so there will always be options - but if you do then there is quite literally nothing like it.
On the PSVR subreddit there are people with serious illness who haven't left their houses/bedrooms for years who are getting to experience new things.
Games are great and all that - but there is a real need for people to 'unhook' from modern life without the need for drugs - I think VR could provide this - it has amazing therapeutic potential that we could all benefit from.
Someone had the idea for a 'Caribbean Chill-out' which got my vote - bring it on :D Although I'm also looking forward to the Apollo 11 experience too.
"Have you not heard of laxatives? "
I'm confused (or you are). You appear to be suggesting that he either shits standing up, or that laxatives can someone allow him to bend his leg without pain so he can shit in a toilet.
ORRRR...you think the crying was due to not being able to shit, when I believe it would be more to do with not being able to bend his leg.
Take your pick. Personally I'm hoping you meant he should shit standing up, coz at least that paints a funny picture :)
I think some people are missing the main point of the article - and that is that Apple increased the *quantity* of rapid turnover of device development, which has led to massive economies of scale, which has led us to the point where we can get a decent VR headset into our homes for £350/$399.
Although I do agree the sunshine blowing was a bit OTT.