Re: How about if we stop making more terrorists in the first place?
"At the end of the day it all boils down to semantics."
If you believe the MSM they'll tell you it's all down to 'anti-semanticism'.
5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
I once had a job repairing hard drives in a class 10 clean room (MFM days). The risk is that any particles on the disk behave like a ski-ramp for the ceramic heads.
When they take off and come back down, they create an impact crater which just means that the problem will only get worse from there. Enough 'pings' and you will suffer a head-crash (where the ceramic head disintigrates) and you are then ploughing your platter with a metal spike at 7500rpm :)
Having said that I once did a rush job swap of platters on a 20Mb MFM drive on my desk and when we ran it through the tester it had zero errors - something we struggled to achieve in the clean room!
"Nope, they were all pretty much the same at the time. "
I don't know what you were looking at at the time, but I have to disagree. I worked at an ISP when Google launched and the brand logo plus search box on a white page literally won people over instantly. I also used to like the 'lucky dip' option which could take you to some very odd places. Wouldn't dare use it now of course.
"Why don't you just invest in a firewall device that you can configure to block access from the Internet to all those ports Micro$oft love to keep open by default ?"
Well, when my work laptop is connected, it's using split-tunnel so no naught connections to my local network at all once I've VPN'd to the corporate network.
Once connected, my machine is effectively on a DMZ within the perimeter of the corporate security estate, and I know how leaky that is because I used to work for the company that manages it. If I can connect to a network share at the office via an SSL VPN then I can sure as hell get hit by malware using those ports to host-hop.
So, tell me Mr AC - where exactly does the firewall fit into this? I'm more likely to be protected by the IPS solution than the firewall, since the firewall is set to allow those connections that are at risk.
@Charles9 - that's a false argument. After all, we do expect this only to be used in a targetted fashion don't we? Therefore if it's targetted, they already know that the communication is suspect.
If we simply accept *they* will decrypt *everything* on the offchance of finding a fish, then we are all criminals and the only recourse left to the free people of Earth is to own it and actually become the criminals they fear us to be.
"So often one finds one's destiny on the path one takes to avoid it."
"Then watch them try to click on an icon as the mouse goes in the opposite direction."
A mate once asked me to help him sort out a virus on his PC. There was a little information box on the screen, but you couldn't shut it off or even move it. It was also not showing up in the process queue.
It was my experience with the desktop trick that made me check the background image - someone had managed to snap his desktop and overlay the dialogue, then save it back :)
Needless to say I never got any credit for sorting that one out, a more accurate description in the first paragraph should have been 'ex-mate' :)
Many years ago I got fed up with the lack of desktop organisation tools so I cobbled something together so that all the grouped icons on my desktop were contained within sectioned areas with relevant headings etc. and it was all nice and clear and no matter how many icons I had I could find what I needed.
Someone from the web team came along and wanted a copy, which I refused at the time (for reasons which will become apparent). I then got into bother for apparently re-programming the desktop and IT stuck their noses in - then they wanted a copy.
In the end I had to admit that I'd created a picture in mspaint and set it as my background, then just dropped icons into the relevant sections :D For some reason everyone lost interest after that.
Why aren't 'people' asking the government what would be different if they had access to every bit and byte that exists, in real-time?
They aren't interested in stopping attacks, all they are interested in is tracking down the contacts of the perpetrators once they've committed an act of atrocity. It serves their purpose to have the general population fearful and rubber-stamping draconian laws that will come back to bite us all on the arse.
It doesn't require prescience to see this, just a view of history. Power is as power does.
I'm assuming that she wouldn't have had a smart phone on her to take a picture of her monitor?
Another method would be print to a file, sneak the file out, and then print it from somewhere else - depends on whether sneaking a digital copy out is easier or harder than sneaking out a doctored A4 printout.
", but if you want mass murder of unknown innocent people you will find that in almost all cases the cause is religion. "
I think you'll find deeper causes should you look. The ones that spring to mind are:
1. Fear
2. Greed
3. Jealousy
Everything else seems like window dressing to me.
Fundamentally, risk management is composed of two primary elements.
1. Chance of failure.
2. Impact of failure.
For example, a huge asteroid hitting the Earth has a low chance of occurring (relative to a human life-span for example) - but since the impact it would have would be fatal to the entire planetary ecosystem and all the life that needs that ecosystem, the overall risk assessment would be HIGH RISK.
On the other hand, if the chances of my pen failing is quite high it wouldn't be classed as HIGH RISK since the impact would be low* (I can just use another pen).
*Unless the pen in question was being used as a wedge that prevented a switch closing which would detonate the self-destruct device on my spaceship - but that's just bad design and probably a different conversation :)
5*9's realiability isn't a measure of how long your systems could be down for in any given time period, it's a level of confidence that you are prepared to back with financial compensation should you not meet that target.
It has nothing to do with *actual* downtime that could happen.
"Trouble comes when IT gets overruled by the executives."
Whilst true, there is a counter-measure.
If you are consistent and can always back up your position with well thought out arguments (nothing emotive, but passion is allowed) you can spend a few years building up a reputation of being a no-nonsense troubleshooter who does the right thing, even when it isn't popular.
Then, when you've pulled their nuts out of the fire enough times for you name to be familiar to people at C-Level you get to throw your toys out of the pram on occasion and sometimes you are listened to :) Having said that, you also have to be prepared to leave* and take your 'legendary arse saving' reputation to another firm before they wake up and realise you are serious.
*You don't get to do this often, so you have to pick your battles, and you'd better bloody well be right!
Manage this incredibly arcane ritual properly and you stand a chance of auto-correcting one, perhaps two, major potential fuck-ups in your career. No one will give a shit, only you and a few others will ever know, but your reputation will gain depth and that, my friend, is a bankable commodity these days.
Until yesterday I've been driving round in a 15 year old VW Golf. It was a bit ratty, but perfectly reliable and you wouldn't believe the amount of stuff you could cram into it with the rear seats down.
Unfortunately there was nothing wrong with the car, but there seems to be something wrong with other peoples' opinion of you if you drive a ratter - since no self-respecting poor person would be seen dead in anything less than a £30k BMW or something.
Finally, at the wife's behest, I finally allowed myself to be shamed into buying a new (second hand) car that's only 10 years old (but it is a £30k BMW :) ) Now people look at me and hate me rather than despise me - people are such twats - nice car though :)
Can anyone explain to me why I have to drive round in a valuable, highly depreciating, asset to prove that I'm not poor? (Even though the previous owners all apparently lived on council estates where google maps shows every other car is very flashy, if not brand new).
I sometimes earn more in a year than these peoples' houses are worth (well, not quite, but almost) and no-one seems to own their cars either - but the perception is *everything* apparently.
Personally, I would much rather send my kids to a decent school, live in a nice house in a nice neighbourhood and yes, drive round in a shitty looking reliable-as-fuck 15 year old VW Golf - but that makes me poor in other peoples' eyes somehow - people are idiots.
This is why I am more in demand than ever at work, even though I keep hiking my rates - it's all about perception - and the fact that most people are seriously fucking stupid.
Not even techies are immune. I once put forward the idea that two loaves of bread that were baked at the same place, using the same ingredients, but were then sold under different brands - one at the Co-op (50p), the other at Waitrose (£1.50) - and guess which one they said they would choose? (Bearing in mind I've already told them that they are exactly the same) - out of 10 people I asked, every single one of them said they'd buy the Waitrose one.
I no longer think I'm an alien on this planet - I think everyone else is :)
"It helps to work on multiple company projects and being able to liaise with staff in the others."
This is basically what I've just done, I've moved into another role with an established level of trust right from the off, but you're always having to deal with all the exclusion clauses in the contracts these days - even if they aren't strictly enforceable, if both parties are aware of the restriction the new client won't take you on if it's going to piss off one of their major accounts.
Developing projects and contacts at other companies is much harder these days as well, since most of the projects I'm running are pretty involved and I'm not sure I could cope with page-shifting whole networks & designs in and out of my head several times a day - my brain just can't cope with that anymore - I'm getting old! :)
"And if your reputation is good enough you'll be able to walk into another job elsewhere."
100% Agree, although it can sometimes be a bit of a ball-ache when you are vested in the projects you are working on (not the done thing I know, but someone's gotta care).
Also, I sometimes don't push for rate rises (it can make things awkward for the team manager come renewal time); as an alternative I push for things that the team manager has discretionary decision making powers over - such as remote working (which can often be equivalent to a healthy rate rise, in addition to reduce hours travelling etc.) - if I've built up some of those kinds of benefits I find myself reluctant to just push off somewhere else where I'd have to start building the trust again.
Having said that, if things get sticky all that goes by the wayside and I will just bugger off and they know it :)
Every contractors first priority is to secure the next renewal (preferably by fair means, such as making yourself indespensible).
I understand that not everyone gets to fit into that bracket, but if your job security is based on your skillset and ability to deliver (i.e. reputation). If you don't stand up for yourself, no-one else will.
Whilst you are no doubt going to get down-voted, I have to agree somewhat.
America is the first country that we all tend to think of when shit starts rolling downhill, and they are up to a lot of shit, then it all rolls downhill to the rest of us.
However, America is usually the only country that manages to muster up some kind of defence and motivation to challenge the powers that be - unfortunately that doesn't tend to roll downhill.
Eventually America might end up with some degree of balance and checks in their system, whilst the rest of us suffocate under a mountain of rolling shit.
I've often thought that it would be nice to take the positive traights of each nation and roll them into one nation without all the negatives. For example, I love the American positivity in the face of overwhelming reality (but I don't like the arrogance/ignorance that often goes with it).
I liked the British stoicism (don't see much of that anymore sadly) and sheer grit, but I don't like their holier than thou mentality (in the face of overwhelming reality etc. ;) )
The French have (had?) this great militant attitude to authority if it pissed them off. We used to moan about them blocking up the ports and setting huge piles of sheep on fire, but I miss those days - everyone seems to have lost their bollocks, and I know why...
Self-censorship. If you think that you might get a knock on the door in the middle of the night because of something you said that someone in power didn't like (and they'll know because they're spying on everything you say and do) then you adjust your behaviour.
This frog is boiled.