Sir
"Bail was refused because of fears he could be a target for unstable people"
"We are going to deny you your freedom for your own good, honest."
There, fixed that for them. C'mon, really?
5770 publicly visible posts • joined 29 May 2007
From the BBC web page covering his arrest..
"Mr Assange is accused by the Swedish authorities of one count of unlawful coercion, two counts of sexual molestation and one count of rape, all alleged to have been committed in August 2010"
Is it just me, or have I been hearing about the alleged sexual assaults since before August?
If you put all this in a film, people would be moaning about how implausable it all was and what a lame plot device to get him into custody.
Step 2 will be the extradition request to the US on trumped up charges (now that he is in custody).
Lame plot guys.
Probably spend a productive hour making a camberwell carrot, and then the next 3 hours unproductively smoking it.
He was supposed to be a carpenters son, yet I never heard how good his tables were. He was probably stoned all the time which is where he got all his sky fairy ideas from. I doubt he could even manage a little wooden spoon.
For those of limited humour - this is a JOKE. I'm still allowed to make fun of religious figures, aren't I?
Where did they get it from before? 'Coz they sure as hell didn't base it on previous scientific reports*
I think they have at least gone one step in the right direction and basically admitted they're not interested in the facts. That's something to fight against if you disagree. I mean, if you're a subject matter expert and an idiot seeks your opinion and you give it, it's hardly suprising you'll get pissed off if they keep on ignoring it just because it doesn't meet with their ideological propoganda. It would certainly piss me off.
*unless they just do the opposite all the time
I have a 50 year old sister in-law who has a serious attitude problem with her 21 year old daughter when it comes to smoking pot, i.e. comes down on her like a ton of bricks - she really is anti-drugs, and being an ex-nurse she is in a position to know after all.
That is until you know some other facts about her, like..
1. She is addicted to codeine, so much so she can't take anything less and have it work, and she's been giving this to her daughter as well since she was 3!
2. She's a raging alcholic and a very ugly drunk. So much so she was dismissed from her position as a nurse when she failed to supervise a junior properly when they were administering drugs which caused a fatality.
3. She smokes 60 cigs a day, and yet her and her husband are so skint they have knowlingly eaten rotten chicken before now.
BUT, she doesn't smoke pot, so she has the moral high ground. Nothing she has done is illegal (apart from being drunk at work I think). Fucking stupid, yes, but not illegal - and that's what seems to count.
This is also the mentality of the government it seems and a massive, stupid, retarded, FAIL.
Isn't it amazing that a technology firm that gathers an unsavoury reputation is more attractive to certain interested parties. Scum, in other words.
Oh, and "Huawei and Huawei Symantec do not have any joint ventures with Phorm and do not cooperate with Phorm or use any technologies from Phorm to provide product to individual subscribers or companies in the UK"
that whole statement is also negated if they just don't offer it as a product to 'individual subscribers'. You could drive 10 buses through the holes in that statement, very trustworthy I'm sure.
Why won't these Phukkers just die*
*by that I mean 'go out of business'**
**maybe
At first I thought the article lacked appropriate comprehension techniques aimed at the literate, but then I came to the actualisation in my mind that
<scrob off>
there's no need to spell check.
<scrob>
Apologies to fervent administers of the aforementioned technique if this utterable has somehow encompassed a passing facsimile of sense.
"½ frozen pellets"
I don't wish to be pedantic, but..
<pedant>
The basic diameter of a paintball is 0.68", not 1/2 (I'm assuming you meant inches)
There are other diameters available, but not in the 'high power' end of the market.
This is most closely appoximated by a solid nylon bearing of 11/16th diameter, available for 50p a throw if you buy 100.
</pedant>
Moral: Don't mess with me when I'm testing my markers out at home :)
Were these sci-fi books?
I only ask because I'm aware of a very large torrent with around that many titles in it. Most of the books are represented in multiple formats (so not 20000 individual titles) and the formatting/OCR correction is a bit poor.
The fact that someone paid money for something that is freely available is a bit odd, unless they don't know about torrents.
Personally, if I was to go down that route, I would select only titles from the torrent that I already owned and re-format and spell check them myself before converting them to Kindle format. I don't suppose the end result would be perfect, but as I'm already familiar with the material any spelling mistakes and formatting errors would be live-able with.
All it would require for a Darknet to become an Internet is a peering agreement and someone to dish out IP addresses and domain names.
The powers that be REALLY don't understand technology do they?
oh, and whilst we're at it..
"By working through Nominet, however, it would be much easier for police to block such efforts centrally by revoking the domain name of any website republishing the allegedly illegal information"
..can you imagine the shady shennigans to be had by hacking a public site with 'censored info' so the police order it taken down. A new kind of DOS.
I think an analogy would be one of those custom car shops that take a stock model and soup it up to be the dog's danglies - but it would also have to involve the ability to use replacement parts for the car that were free.
If that were true I would expect the car companies to cry foul, but I doubt it would be under DMCA 'laws'.
Protectionism at it's finest. The history of gaming is strewn with 'pirating', yet it is now a larger industry than the movies...go figure.
Appreciate the nods, but that minecraft looked like a rollercoaster sim based on the original doom 3d engine :) not exactly what I was looking for.
And I've got the X series up to Terran Confilct, but they take up soooooooooooooo much time, which I don't have as much of these days sadly.
I'm really loving Red Dead Redemption, but there's only so much poker and dice games you can play (if you aren't into killing everything).
Something with the quality of RDR but with some more non-lethal options.
I know Sims + RDR would be about right :D
A call to arms!
Why can't someone write one of these sandbox games that just allow you to live in it, rather than kill everything in sight.
Surely there is room for one game in the marketplace that satisfies this need?
I love sandbox games, but sometimes I'd just like to have a little more to do in them that doesn't involve blowing their heads off.
Just one?
"He's an idiot and he deserves the £3,000 fine and criminal conviction, if only for his terrible sense of humour."
An idiot he might be, but if you are really so heartless as to condemn a man based on a poor sense of humour then I surely pity your long-suffering wife (I'm generously assuming you have one you might notice).
You might not like my little joke at your expense, so are you going to report me to the police and get me a criminal record so I never work in security again? A tad harsh don't you think?
Heart icon: because we could all do with a little more heart - the world is a cynical place and it can only be changed by us.
Wow, this lot takes me back a bit.
Can't really complain about the list, but would like to have seen a few noteable mentions such as
Robotron - move in 8 directions with one stick, fire in 8 directions with the other - mental
Gauntlet - 4 player madness and stacks of fun
Space Harrier - moving seat platform goodness
There are others, but I think most oldies would recognise the above :)
As much as I think you are right, I also think you're thinking one level too low.
The real motivation is control of the populace. Terrorism is just a tool - they don't give a flying fuck at a rolling doughnut if we all get creamed by terrorists, as long as it provides leverage to allow them more freedom and us less. Politicians don't consider themselves 'one of us' you know, to them we're just plebs, cash cows and all that.
If only the terrorists were clever enough to realise they are being used.
I wasn't previously aware that the law actually changed when the security threat level to the country did, unless a state of emergency is declared of course.
Are we in a state of emergency? I certainly feel like the country is in a state of distress, and not because of the terrorists, but because of the government response to the terrorists.
Flames, coz we're all fiddlin' whilst Rome burns, baby.
Word of advice to anyone pursuing a defence in a court of law..
Ask the ISP to provide proof positive that all the devices involved in recording the IP address, including the netscraping tool that picks up the IP's from the torrent uploaders, are in actually stratum 1 compliant.
If they're not, how can they prove that it was you?*
*Most IP leases are quite long so this doesn't completely hold water - but it does mean you can prove they're equipment isn't 100% in synch regarding timestamps.
Christ, the number of machines in the company I'm working for that are still using GMT (not adjusted) when they're redundant partner kit is on BST (well, GMT now but adjusted).
Makes going through the logs a real pain the ariston.