2188 posts • joined 25 Mar 2010
Re: It's not a compass.
My guess is that "commercially viable" will be available about the same time as fusion power.
There's a certain type of boffin - and for reasons that are pretty obvious when you think about it, they're often a type that loves working on govt-funded R&D projects - who think that once they've demonstrated an effect in principle, everything after that is just boring donkey-work. This is the demonstration-in-principle, now it's "just" a matter of bolting six of the things together, reducing space, weight and power requirements by a factor of 10,000, and manufacturing costs by a thousand times that, and fixing all those annoying glitches that they still don't fully understand but managed to work around for demo purposes...
How hard can it be? - as they said about fusion, back in the '70s.
And then someone will have to interface it to Android and iOS. That's where things will really get tricky.
So we're in favour of massive police DNA databases now, are we?
Sheesh. Every time I start thinking I might want to come back to England, I see something like this.
I found a security hole in Steam that gave me every game's license keys and all I got was this... oh nice: $20,000
Re: People will [..] share out of a desire to show off
Some people will share to show off, sure.
But if you ever again want to have access to software that's been developed by a team of more than three people, that's not going to cut it. Many/most coders enjoy the process of creation, quite a few even like design. But very few enjoy rigorous testing and debugging, and even fewer believe in documentation. And as for project management - it's hard enough to get people to do that when you are paying them...
GDPR USA? 'A year ago, hell no ... More people are open to it now' – House Rep says EU-like law may be mulled
If you take every reasonable precaution but still get wrongfooted by something you couldn't have foreseen, then that's not exactly a right way to drop them, but at least you haven't done anything wrong.
Accidit stercore, as the legal doctrine has it.
Re: I don't care what they do
"Anything" would be an improvement?
I've learned never to say that. People tend to take it as a challenge.
In news that will shock absolutely no one, America's cellphone networks throttle vids, strangle rival Skype
Unfortunately, those "policies" are more like guidelines, which management will tweak constantly and may well violate randomly with ad-hoc decisions from day to day.
Publishing them would reveal to the world how amateurishly it's being run. I don't know of any company, in any industry anywhere, that would be up for that.
VAT is collected from the party that sells the thing. That's a sales tax. Yes, there's some extra accounting that goes into it, designed to make it fairer and avoid accumulating, but the end result is that 20% or whatever it is of the total turnover goes to the treasury.
Of course the tax is ultimately paid by the end consumer of the item. And who the heck else do you imagine is going to end up paying this tech tax, if the EU is dumb enough to pass it?
OP is spot on: VAT, aka sales tax, is the only fair way to tax big companies. A tax on "profits" inevitably ends up with a lot of very fat accountants, and angry headlines in the tabloids about how some billion-dollar business is paying $4.93 in tax.
Web Foundation launches internet hippie manifesto: 'We've lost control of our data, it is being used against us'
Re: We already have the solution
Translation: "If everyone were more like me, there'd be no problem."
That's not what we earthlings call a "solution".
Re: Odd middle ground
It's a screen that you can put wherever you like, that turns on instantly (zero boot time), that can be propped up against the toaster to show a recipe, or shared with the whole family if need be.
The big mistake people make is in thinking that it's a type of computer. It's not. It's a media consumption device, it has more in common with a TV than a laptop. Think of it in those terms, and you might understand the use cases better.
Re: Not surprised...
My 8-year-old iPad 2 is still going, still more than good enough for web browsing, video streaming and older games. It still gets used quite a lot, but I see no likelihood of replacing it when it finally flakes out. The spouse will just have to give in and get a smartphone like everyone else.
Re: It's out of control
Meh. If a forum uses an ad server to insert its own bespoke emojis, rather than relying on Unicode, that's on them. Can't blame Google for that.
Re: Commander-In-Chief to blame
The political system in the US has been hijacked by a modern day praetorian guard who think they know how to run things better then the politicians.
I don't think there's much doubt about it - they do know how to run things better than the politicians.
The problem is that this leaves out the important question: "better for what exactly?" That's what politicians are supposed to decide, but instead they spend their time trying to micromanage, mostly in the hope of scoring points off each other.
If politicians would stick to their jobs and let the intelligencers do theirs, then the system would have a chance to work. But until then, expect this pointless power struggle to continue.
Re: It wasn't that long ago
And Charles Darwin used to be on the £10. Way back, Stevenson was on the £5.
I'd say scientists (and engineers) haven't done so badly on Bank of England currency. (The Scots have their own hangups, as usual.)
The big question here
Why in the name of all that is noodly does any feature of CSS need a frickin' API?
The server sends the data, the browser presents it to the user. CSS makes suggestions about how it should do that, but suggestions is all they are. If the browser is sending information back about how it chose to present it - frankly it's time to tear down the whole Web and start over.
Bomb squad descends on suspicious package to find something much more dangerous – a Journey cassette
Re: Lack of science in schools
You're asking for an awful lot of analysis from a minimum-wage mailroom drone.
Re: DRM didn't protect anything, ever.
Good grief, you name a couple of turkeys and present that as evidence that Hollywood is dead? Would you care to name the golden age in which there were no sucky films produced?
Hollywood is doing very nicely, thank you for your concern. The complaint about everything being remakes and sequels has been made routinely for the past 20 years, and it's never been true. Just look at the programme at your nearest multiplex right now: is there really nothing new there?
Of course the quality is completely hit and miss. It always was. But off the top of my head, since the alleged death of Hollywood, I've seen: Life of Pi, Saving Mr Banks, Gravity, The World's End, Frozen, Lincoln, Wreck-it Ralph, Pacific Rim, Death of Stalin, Zootopia, Moana. All of them pretty good, of their kind. If over the same period you've seen nothing but turkeys, remakes and superhero pap - I'm afraid that's on you.
Euro eggheads call it: Facebook political ads do change voters' minds – and they worked rather well for Trump in 2016
This isn't about "advertising your opinion". If that was what people were doing, we wouldn't be talking about it.
It's about ads carefully designed and directed to create a false impression of facts. Not opinions.
Of course you can reasonably retort that the press does that all the time, and that's a whole separate argument we can have. But first let's recognise what's happening here: the ads are not about argument or persuasion, they're not even about spin or slant - they're straight-up lying.
Re: QA Prestige
More than that, because testing is only as good as the documentation that comes with it. Before you can test, you need - something like an actual spec.
That rules it out for about 30% of all companies right away.
And the spec needs to be reasonably clear, complete, accurate and up to date. That probably strikes out another 50%.
Without that documentation, QA is always getting the mushroom treatment.
Alternatively of course you could just write comprehensive user documentation. (Then tie it to the leg of a passing carrier pig.)
Re: I'm not missing the opportunity to flip this...
If Labour hadn't adopted its "members elect the leader directly" constitution...
If the Scots had voted to leave the UK... or if their referendum had never happened at all...
If the Germans had treated the Greeks a little better...
Heck, if Philip II of Spain had succeeded in invading England in 1588...
I could play "things that could have prevented the referendum" all day. But I've got things to do.
Nobody has convicted him of rape. True.
But what I don't see is anybody suggesting that he should be jailed for that without a trial. If you have seen such a suggestion, could you point to it?
Re: Please, someone set up a GoFundMe
If you could create a self-cleaning cat litter tray, you wouldn't need GoFundMe. Venture capitalists would be falling over themselves to shovel money at you.
Re: Lets face facts
Ruthless, "no-nonsense" leaders have a long and distinguished history across all civilisations and religions, there's nothing distinctively Muslim about them.
Consider, e.g.: Stalin, Mao, Franco, Mugabe, and many more of their ilk.
Re: Follow the money
Searching for "Yemen" on the BBC News site shows more than 10 stories published this week. Exactly how much coverage do you need before it stops being "non-existent"?
Re: What a mess.
Well, yes, of course, in the same way as Windows XP will still run. But if you're still using it past that date, you deserve what you get.
Re: The Hunt for Bug October
Waitaminute - Microsoft Support has a phone?
Waitanotherminute - Microsoft has Support?
Re: What a mess.
You've got less than 15 months left on that. I'd suggest looking to the replacement about now.
Of course they're competing for resources. What else *could* happen?
And better for them to have a military that you (indirectly) support, than to have one that doesn't need you to support it.
China has a million people in re-education camps
The US has over 2 million. Plus twice that number on parole.
You don't see me rushing to move to the USA either.
and moving your files off the OS partition actually is a very sensible thing to do. Most unkind to sting these users
They didn't sting *those* users, those users were fine. The ones who got stung were the ones who started saving *some* of their files on another partition, but still left others in the original location. Which is *not* really "a very sensible thing to do" in my estimation.
The articles say it all
It's "a top priority", "a critical priority". In other words, it's one of many such "priorities". How many, exactly? - might actually be an interesting question to ask, next time they lay themselves open to such interrogation.
I'm sure they're "sincere in their desire to be more secure", just like I'm sincere in my desire to be more healthy. Wanting something, no matter how "sincere", is not enough. You also need to be willing to give up something else to get it. What, specifically, is Intel willing to cut down on, to improve security?
On the seventh anniversary of Steve Jobs' death, we give you 7 times he served humanity and acted as an example to others
Re: Classic Reg, keeping it classy
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
If you insist on knocking people down just because they're popular, you risk lowering everyone to the same level. You miss the salient fact that some people really are a whole heap worse or better than others.
"The evil that men do lives after them, the good is oft interred with their bones." I would rather have a world in which Trump had died and McCain and Jobs lived.
What could be more embarrassing for a Russian spy: Their info splashed online – or that they drive a Lada?
In most countries, journalists don't have any special privileges. If they can do it, so can you.
US law, for instance, allows "journalists" to claim limited immunity for not giving up the name of a source. But the kicker is, there is no real definitive description of "journalist". If you, as a private individual, want to claim that you were acting "as a journalist" when you made that blog post, you can.
(This is a necessary consequence of the First Amendment, which makes it illegal for the government to pass a law saying "these are the criteria for being a journalist".)
In Russia... I don't know, but I imagine people who pull this kind of stunt when the Kremliin doesn't want them to, are running considerable risks that have nothing to do with the courts.
Re: No one asked the question yet
It's more accurate to say that the US, like Russia and for that matter every other country, feels that its laws don't cover the whole planet, and therefore anything that happens outside its borders is no concern of its courts, and therefore doesn't need to be legal.
It may be against some other country's laws, but as far as the US courts are concerned, that's Someone Else's Problem.
It's more obvious with the US and Russia, because they've got the resources and the brass face to pull off these operations more often than anyone else. But every country takes that attitude.
Re: Every one spies
You don't think Putin would trade the Skripals, then order them murdered in the most publicly attributable way possible, just pour encourager les autres? Somehow I can easily see him doing exactly that.
I'm sure the GRU agents will be fine, they'll just have to keep a low profile for a while. Maybe they've been shuffled to desk jobs, or maybe they're even now recovering from plastic surgery. You don't pack trained assassins off to Siberia just for getting made one time, they're too valuable a resource.
New Zealand border cops warn travelers that without handing over electronic passwords 'You shall not pass!'
Re: Australia has more draconian laws
And as has been observed, the US doesn't give a toss about "reasonable cause". In fact, nothing in their so-wonderful Constitution applies to non-citizens entering their borders.
This is widely believed, but it's not true. The constitution and its protections apply to anyone within US jurisdiction, regardless of citizenship.
American citizens like to forget this, because it makes them feel special. Politicians like to forget it, because it makes their voters feel special, and simultaneously allows them to pass laws breaching those protections and pretending that they're only for foreigners, when in fact - once the law is passed - it by definition applies to everyone.
Re: Have fun!
In a way it's funny that the "trade craft" of visiting our major Nato ally is now something like visiting East Berlin in the early 80s
New Zealand is not anybody's "major Nato ally". Perhaps you are getting it mixed up with some other country. At least NZ doesn't subject you to mugshots and fingerprinting (fingerprinting! Seriously, why?) on entry, like some "major Nato allies" I could name.
If you think that the officials are going to be passing around your family photos for their titillation and amusement, then... I suggest you lobby for them to get a pay rise so that they can afford broadband. Believe me, there's better material already online.
More to the point, what do you expect you'll find on it when you get it back?
If you honestly believe that the authorities would do that just to get at you personally, then sorry to break it to you, but you've already lost. Not just the battle, you've lost the whole war, and your country is officially a shithole now. Or maybe you're just paranoid.
In a previous role I had accounts on my phone which allowed access to security and audit documentation for a sensitive UK Government IT system. I personally wouldn't have cared who saw it except that I'd signed some paperwork that would let me be jailed if I made them available.
Then you'll be pleased to note that the phone is examined in flight mode. What you have "access" to is literally neither here nor there. Unless you're rash enough to store local copies on the phone itself.
Re: Have fun!
That sounds like a very expensive way to make a point. Why don't you just stay away?
I'm happy to unlock my phone for any reasonable authority who asks politely. It's a phone. What do you expect they'll find? By this time they've already got my name, address, biography and family details.
Seriously, I've never seen so much fuss made about a provision that - by current international standards - is still incredibly mild (by which I mean, you're subject to way more intrusive searches if you fly into, say, the USA or Australia, where they will simply seize your device - indefinitely - if you refuse to unlock it on demand). What the hey do some of you people keep on your phones, anyway?
Re: Mission Creep
If you're transiting through a US airport, then you're considered to be entering the country and are subject to all the checks that come with that process, including customs and immigration. I bitterly remember standing in line at LAX after a 12 hour flight, to explain to a frankly incredulous immigration officer that I didn't have an address in the US because I was never planning to enter the blasted place.
If you're transiting through NZ - from one international flight straight on to another - currently you are not required to go through NZ customs. There's been no announcement of any plan to change that.
I can see "migrating the unfiltered data, then purging excess data from the new DB" as a sensible strategy. But that purge would have to be immediate - something that happens, done and dusted, before the first daily full backup gets taken.
Re: And there my fellow commentards is THE brexit dividend
It's not the dividend, it's the whole point of Brexit for the politicians
It's not "the politicians" who wanted Brexit in the first place.
Something like 80% of them campaigned against it, and something like 75% would still like to stop it, if only they could figure out a way to pin the blame on everyone but themselves.
I use Skype every week to talk to an elderly and technophobic relative, on the far side of the planet.
What version is he using? Heck if I know, and I'm damn sure he wouldn't even understand the question. But if it suddenly stops working, I wouldn't give much for his chances of learning to use anything else. It's taken him several years to learn how to receive calls on Skype, and even now he's far from confident with it.
Dear Microsoft: is it really asking too much for you to just STOP FUCKING AROUND WITH THINGS THAT ALREADY WORK?
How are any of those stories remotely relevant to this one, Anon?
Re: All hail Ms. Bourne
"Heroes" are, simply, people you look up to. It's an inherently subjective thing, there is no agreed canon.
No doubt Ms Bourne is a hero to some. But if anyone, anyone at all, actually claims to be "a hero", I think they're full of... effluent.
British wartime intelligence went to great lengths to keep the secret. The high command even (as mentioned above, and downvoted for some reason) sometimes refused to act on Ultra intel, because they felt it could blow the gaffe.
There were some close calls, and the Germans must have had suspicions from time to time, but never to the point of acting on them, at least not concertedly and effectively.
Heck, if they'd just stopped saying "Heil Hitler" in every other message, that alone would have made the job significantly harder.
You use an email address for banking? Why?
The big surprise here
... is that they admitted to it.