Re: Boney? ( Part 2 )
He finally finished the upgrade from a wired to wireless home network.
There was a cat 5 that really was gone.
1557 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2007
Or they didn't vote because they were being actively suppressed by one of the many legal measures that were in place to prevent citizens from voting in the US elections. That happened to a lot of people, particularly in swing states ( as the rules tend to be instigated by republican administrations who want to help out their own side ) and very likely enough to swing the states needed for an electoral college win.
Even if there was minimal foreign involvement ( and all the evidence seems to suggest there is ) it seems that all the electoral organisation in the US is completely partisan, so there is a huge amount of voter suppression and gerrymandering that goes on across the board there.
I don't know why anybody in the US thinks that is alright, but everyone seems to take an attitude of "oh well, I guess people's votes don't really matter that much anyway" which seems really odd in a country that makes a big old fuss about democracy. And that's even before you get to the weirdness of the Electoral College and the way that your vote has a totally different value based on where you live.
From an agricultural point of view something like this can be useful for monitoring livestock - one of my friends currently has a camera along these lines set up to keep an eye on a sick horse in the stable.
Like a lot of these types of gadget, it is quite practical in a few very specific circumstances. Whether any of them are common enough to make it a viable commercial endeavour is another matter.
This really made me smile and I absolutely don't want to make you feel like I'm saying this in a mean way because I genuinely love it, but there is a noticeable difference between a woodpecker and a wood pecker.
If you're talking about a bird, you probably mean the former...
As I understand it ( and it may become clear shortly that I am not a physicist ) a quantum leap in computing would result in a machine that will execute any task it has been handed during its own lifetime in an arbitrary order. Processing would commence with an "Oh boy" statement, whereupon the main thread has to identify where and when it is located, resolve some kind of dilemma and move onto the next process. Meanwhile a secondary thread will slap a small piece of perspex and spout percentage chances regarding the purpose of the current job, which will all turn out to be incorrect.
It seems a little bit complicated TBH.
This is where a lot of people in AI research go wrong in my view. They are treating the problems of intelligence as technical, when the underlying questions that we need to answer are overwhelmingly philosophical.
That is bad news in terms of getting reliable answers because philosophers seem to be pretty bad at that, but until we have a much clearer idea about what consciousness and understanding are, how can we imagine we could simulate them. Even if one relies on the concept of consciousness as an emergent property of the system, relying on something mysterious appearing in a system of sufficient complexity seems little different from superstition.
I believe every outlet has to have at least one Why Trump Won piece and this is one of the better examples. Certainly looks from here as though the Democrats lost at least as hard as Trump won, but then it's hard right? You lived your whole life in a certain environment and it has always worked out fine for you, why would you expect that to change? Seems like a lot of Washington had no idea how thin the ice they have been skating on for decades had grown. Will be interesting to see what comes of that.
Something that seems to be is missing from a lot of analysis is that nobody outside cities votes Democrat. Maybe if they acted like they were remotely interested in people outside major conurbations, the map wouldn't be a huge red expanse between a pair of thin blue brackets. But then this time around they didn't really seem that interested in anyone really.
I can see AI being good enough to match a human doing a shitty job at this kind of thing, but probably not someone with real skill. The problem being that most humans of skill start out doing a shitty job but get better with experience, so perhaps over time the outcome of AI in many of these currently human-occupied roles is that you have something cheaper than humans but the standard drops in general because the AI becomes the benchmark of doing the job.
Also there is the whole thing about how AI is often trained with it's creators racial biases and you potentially end up with automated systems that might behave in ways that are effectively racist and who do you call out on that? The people running the systems? The people creating them? Establishing the human responsible would be an interesting challenge.
Not like this, though, was it?
All the experts ( in fact anyone with the most basic grasp of how economies work ) said it would be a financially suicidal move, enough people voted for it and surprise the experts turned out to be right.
We might have lost a few percentage points on the pound, but at least we'd still have had banks and multinational companies operating in the UK. We're going to lose that and it is going to hurt the whole country like hell. I anticipate at best a massive post-brexit kicking from the IMF, quite possibly a Brefault on the national debt and a proper collapse of the pound.
At which point the Brexiteers will doubtless crow that they have made us all millionaires.
"As we talked of salty meat and Turkish Bob, I began to sweat and dribble, the shop became a giddy plughole of plastic, price cards and a father and child asking if I had finished with the lap top, I opened my mouth to answer but words don’t really form in a boiling geyser of pork..."
I suspect I'm not alone in being reminded of this.
I was offline this morning too. I find it a little reassuring when a story about that kind of problem shows up on the Reg- at least it means it's a big problem that will probably get addressed. If I have a problem that means they have to get BT involved ( they're part of BT, but apparently not in any useful sense ) then it will be a long time before I see any internet.
At least Labour have remembered how to do opposition again. Unfortunately they've only figured out how to oppose the other bit of Labour, so it's still a complete waste of everybody's time while the unchallenged Tories stomp Godzilla-like over every aspect of Britain leaving havoc in their wake but you know, got to be a move in the right direction hey?