Liverotesque
I'll just add my voice to the chorus saying how much we apparently all enjoy articles written in the tone of a weary existentialist.
Reminds me of the classic comentaries of Jaques "Jaques" Liverot.
1557 publicly visible posts • joined 24 May 2007
I use Audacity a lot and around the current version there's not much difference between platforms.
If you're dealing with a lot of VSTs that is a little different, though they do often work under Wine, but those tend to be more in the realm of serious studio recording, for which one would plausibly use something like Ardour on Linux rather than Audacity.
If you are running through a Ltd company in a standard way, you are paying a fair amount of tax - the combination of corporation tax, income tax on dividends certainly adds up to a significant percentage of my income, not ever so far from the proportion I was paying when I was permanent and that is ignoring VAT which is its own thing. I prefer to work this way but it has nothing to do with paying less tax and the same is true of most of the contractors I work alongside.
I think where people really do it for tax avoidance they may be more at the level of chief executives working through consultancy companies and the like. That seems quite common - particularly in the public sector - and it does seem as though there might be reason to mitigate it as possible.
The thing is that this design is also Twitter's strength- as a regular user one can have a degree of conversation with interesting people that is possible because of the brevity and low-commitment form of communication we are using. It's also a great medium for one-liners and sharing interesting links.
Unfortunately the things that make it good, also make it vulnerable to the worst of humans and their organisational reluctance to pay any attention to user concerns does mean it is easy for it to become a horribly negative platform if you attract the attention of the wrong subset of users.
In a way, both the sides of this are like a microcosm of the internet in general.
Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it, but if those who do learn from it have to do so by reading a whole lot of Perl then they might as well go ahead and repeat it anyways - nobody will be able to figure out what it is doing or how it is doing it, let alone why.
So we have Gummer and Rees Mogg facing off against Benn and Kinnock. Firstly, this eighties revival idea has dragged on too long and gone too far; secondly it feels almost as though there is an established political class who are keen to retain power within a few enduring dynasties.
Thank goodness we've taken back our democracy.
There's a little more to it than that- from what I could understand of what I was reading yesterday ( not a finance specialist! ) banks have a passporting system to trade in Europe. France look to be pushing for a deal that lets Britain have most of what they want from a post-EU deal aside from passporting our banks. We get free trade with some migration controls, they get the financial sector, but nobody here minds aside from people working in the financial sector and politicians because most people hate the banks.
I don't know how much veracity there is to this suggestion, but it's interesting and seems like it would be a good move for France.
We'd be stuck in the EU, with no credibility, and no power to change it
Whereas in a post-Brexit agreement that gave us access to the free market, the legendary "Norway style" approach, we would not be in the EU, but we would still be bound by the majority of EU rules with no credibility and no question of having the power to change it. It's a little hard to see how that is better.
Also if a substantial number of people voted based on claims that were immediately revealed to be simple lies ( almost everything the Leave campaign said ) then it doesn't seem as democratic as it might - a misinformed choice that goes against one's best interests puts one onto difficult ground.
Yes.
As someone who felt Remain would have helped us better, it seems to me that now we're leaving there is a real need to make Britain a better place. We're British, we make the best of things and muddle through and we need to stick with this.
But we also need to talk. A lot of people voted Leave because they were angry and close to the edge and that didn't happen because of the EU - if anything they were probably benefiting from EU investment - but their sentiments were whipped up by a particularly malevolent campaign and they were already close to the surface because of decades of cascading failure on the part of multiple governments. We need to be able to engage with these people, to help them find a positive direction. I don't know what that will take, but I don't think it exists on the current political landscape. Post Brexit Britain will be what we make it, so maybe we all need to work on making it something amazing, rather than the disaster the Leave campaign so urgently desire.
Agile is pretty great in certain environments - if I was in a start-up combining design and development on a growing product that needed to have it usable by users as soon as possible and needed it to stay usable by users as the product grew and added new features, I would probably be looking at a full Agile methodology.
That isn't where most businesses are, though. It might look cool because it is what start-ups do, but those requirements are quite different from what most development work seems to be about, which is getting a project to a specific "finished" state within a timespan and a budget that makes it viable for the organisation who are sponsoring it. If you are doing Agile by the book, then you cannot offer any guide for when "finished" is likely to happen and consequently how much it is likely to cost.
Also it seems as though businesses often want to see results fast, which means the first thing they skimp on is the requirements gathering. That is super-important regardless of development methodology, but most of the time they seem determined to get code working from day one rather than figuring out what code would actually be helpful.
In fact, the more I think about it the more I think that if you can set up your starting variables correctly - a solid and well researched requirement, some prototypes and wireframes that people like, an agreement about what goes in and what doesn't from the start - then you have a fair chance of success regardless of methodology. Often you're going to end up with some kind of bastardised sprinterfall or kanbince type approach anyways.
Perhaps I should sell this as "foundationalism" or somesuch and set up as a consultant...
I would like it to be possible to get fast-tracked planning permission on masts if they are beautiful. Not weird fake trees, not pylons with some boxes on them, structures that at least endeavour to offer some aesthetic satisfaction.
Strange, elegant, towers decorating the landscape would make things different in an interesting way.
Our local tunnel was built in the UK and it came in on time and on budget, so it can happen.
On average it has only had to be closed a few nights every month for the five years since it opened, because they cut so many corners on the quality of the equipment used during construction...
It does seem that their ideal monetisation strategy would be to get media companies to pay to reuse twitter content for lazy journo stories, which is to say most of them. A small fee with a bit of that income to Twitter, a bit to the creators and you have a path to something viable albeit nothing close to their market valuation.
People complain about Twitter being full of insane hateful trolls ( it is ) and Facebook being full of awful passive-aggressive dolts posting endless tiresome minion memes ( it is ) but the true dregs of humanity are to be found on Linked In.
I don't even like to use the term in polite company, but Linked In is jammed full of recruitment agents.
Awful. The worst.
I did an MSc conversion course because it seemed to me as though Philosophy was probably not going to pay the bills.
I loved it and found computer science suited me well, although it was a really steep learning curve, but in the group in my year, I think maybe three or four of us came out of the course actually knowing how to program to a practical level, which would be a quarter of the group at best. Everyone else was getting by on sharing code, which was not entirely discouraged by the department as far as I can tell. I suspect I sometimes got worse marks for having written my own code than a lot of the class got after copying one of the other experienced programmers' work.
I do wonder how many of that group are still cutting code twenty years later. Not that many of us, I suspect.
I was hoping this would go ahead because I like Three's attitude, but I also like having phone signal in places like my house and office, which O2 seem to do better on because I'm a yokel. I need to move away from EE now that they are a BT branch, but this makes that choice harder as it means it's samesame products from O2 or Vodaphone basically.
Strange to see this happen with Google now just like it did with Microsoft twelve years ago. I wonder where most of the people now working at Google were working back then.
Those kinds of musicians are often the most interesting - an artist whose work doesn't draw a lot of people in any specific location, artists who have physical or psychological reasons for being unable to perform in front of a crowd - is their work without value because of that? If they are using experimental instruments and arrangements that aren't easily transported or created as one-off performances that only exist in recorded form, does that mean they deserve no income, no matter how great their work is?
I suppose one question might be: Where do we derive value from music? I have been to a lot of gigs down the years and enjoyed them a whole lot, but the real value for me has always been listening to recorded music as the soundtrack to my life. If I was to pay by how much I valued it, that is where my money should go, and as an old-fashioned throwback who still buys albums, that is where it does.
I don't think that people derive less enjoyment from music now, but it seems that even the ones who talk a lot about free markets ( perhaps especially those people ) are unwilling to think of that as an enjoyment that is worth any money.