Re: Spelling!
"If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written."
(and yes, it's supposed to be spelt like that)
6739 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
"If you write anything criticizing editing or proofreading, there will be a fault of some kind in what you have written."
(and yes, it's supposed to be spelt like that)
So people using open source software is bad?
Or is it just because they're charging money for it?
Apple use CUPS in OSX, in fact, they're actually the lead developers, does that make them even worse?
Practically all the servers where I work are running Linux, should I wipe them and install Windows instead?
FFS, the whole point of open source software is for it to be used. As long as companies are abiding by the license, what's the flipping problem?
The latest Apple Watch (with built in LTE) can fully work without a phone.
At this point it's not a smartwatch any more, it's a small smartphone, with a wrist strap. Congratulations, Apple got you to buy a second (concurrent) phone from them, I'm sure the ghost of Steve Jobs is very happy.
Do you mean this bit:
the risk of a former official improperly exploiting privileged access to contacts in government
Because for starters, that's not listed as a rule, it's something that the rules are intending to avoid, and the way that it's avoided is by limiting what he can do for the first two years in his new job.
Secondly, if you read carefully it applied to the "former official", which he isn't, yet.
So, if he doesn't keep to the rules which the Civil Service chooses to place on him, then he would be in breach of the code, but as he hasn't started that job yet, it's a bit early to tell.
I've been wondering recently if the people who complain about "clickbait headlines", do so because they go for the bait.
It's generally pretty obvious just from reading the link that something is just clickbait, so I just don't click on it. It seems pretty simple to me but some people get so het up about it, is that because they're embarrassed about being caught out?
Could the NHS use it?
Only if it benefit any friends-of-MPs who can then give them a cushy 'consultancy' job?
>>>> Joke icon, because of course I'm only joking about our fine Members of Parliament being on the take...
The kids can keep their answering machine-message length ditties, clearly suited to the short-attention span types.
Average length of a chart single in the 1960's was two minutes, that rose to almost five minutes by the 1980's, these days it's down to around three minutes again.
Three to four minutes has long been the preferred length of a single, although of course many genres are partially defined by songs which go on for (sometimes much) longer than that.
What’s wrong with home NAS or cloud? *Somebody* has to have the HDDs, but it doesn’t have to be in the iPad.....
Sure, but as a consumer (the article is specifically not about enterprise gear), when you're looking for a storage medium for your archives, where speed and IOPs don't matter much, are you going to pick up some 1TB spinners for ~£35 or a 1TB SSD for £180?
Once the SSD price is down to maybe £70 for 1TB (ie only twice the spinning rust), then people will start using them more for bulk storage.
(Or take the middle road and combine harddrives with an SSD cache, but we're getting above a normal consumer level then)
Of course, if the cost of making an SSD suddenly drops by half
Currently SSDs are eight to ten times more expensive per GB than harddrives, so the cost of making an SSD is going to have to drop by more than half.
Of course, SSDs are fast, quieter, smaller, and use less power, so I don't think the price will have to reach parity with hardrives for them to totally take over. Perhaps when an SSD is only twice the price of an equivalently sized harddrive?
I'd not looked in a while, so I just totted up the prices and capacities of some SSDs and HDDs.
SSDs are now around the 16p/MB level (the 512MB drives are the sweet spot), up to about 22p/MB for the biggest ones (small ones are also poor value).
HDDs are down to 2p/MB (for 3/4TB drives) or about 3p/MB for very small/large drives.
So If Samsung think their new SSD is going to compete on capacity with hard drives, they're going to have to sell it for about 8-10 times less than their current generation of SSDs. That's unlikely, so the age of harddrives for bulk storage is still with us, and probably will be for a few years yet.
In my head I just get "Is You Is or Is You Ain't My Baby" as sung by Dinah Washington.
A phone with a Three sim in it isn't going to connect to a Vodafone tower if it can't find a Three tower.
Unless you've turned Network Roaming on in your phone's settings, because that's exactly what roaming entails.
(I assume most phone allow the user to change this, but I don't know for sure)
Why would anyone want to be such an idiot
Because some people stand up for what they believe in, even if what they believe in is basically fascism-lite? Because they think that lots of other people secretly agree with them? Because some trolls actually have the guts to try to troll people outside of the internet? Because being an idiot in the US can get you elected?
The fun can be amplified when attempting to figure our how to manually feed envelopes
A few weeks ago I had to print an address onto an envelope, so I carefully worked out where the manual feed was in the printer, and which way round the envelope had to be, and then checked in the printer driver for all the correct settings.
It only bloody worked first time.
Realising that I was treading in a realm where few have trod before, I sensibly decided to go home early. There was no way I was going to top that.
Why not simply develop an AI to write the text in the first place?
Have you met amanfrommars?
More seriously, AI is already being used to do the boring bits.
There's even a somewhat working Linux sync client for OneDrive (for Business) now. It's a slight faff to set up (systemd only) but it does sync ok.
1. I do not trust Microsoft [...]
Well don't use their software then, there's plenty of choice.
Libre/Open Office both work great. Thunderbird is a fine email client. Linux and OSX both work. There's plenty of other cloud storage providers if you need that (although you might have to pay a subscription, that's how renting something works).
Why would you continue using Windows if you dislike everything about it?
BGP is routed (rhymes with shooted). However, when the edge of a piece of wood is cut by a rotating tool, it is routed (rhymes with shouted). Oh, and if an army runs away, it is said to be routed (also rhymes with shouted).
I can't imagine why Americans have such problems with our language...
(Thinking about it, perhaps the English pronunciation for route comes from the French 'rue', meaning road or way?)
I have a friend who's recently moved house, and doesn't have internet yet, so, she keeps going over her data allowance and has to resort to texts. I have other friends who have old phones that can't run a messaging program, again, texts work just fine.
Texting works in some situations where other messaging programs don't, hence, it still has a place.
a steaming pile of the same stuff, just ever so slightly different politics
But that's the thing, it's not the same. Sure, 'all politicians lie', "you can tell because they're mouth's moving", but even among politicians, Trump is a special case.
He really doesn't seem to have a grasp on reality. When Bush and Blair announced that there were WMD's in Iraq, they might well have know that in reality the security services thought that it was quite unlikely, but there was at least a chance (and as the old joke went, they did have the receipts). ie they knew they were probably pushing the truth, but there was a chance they were right. With Trump, he just announces what he wants to be true ('biggest inauguration crowd ever'), and immediately starts believing it.
I've met the odd pathological liar before and this is exactly that sort of behaviour. It's not telling the odd porky in the hope of misleading the electorate, it's outright fantasy.
The problem with putting security above convenience is that people are lazy, and if it's 'too hard' to stay secure, then, well, you won't stay secure.
For example, in this case, if you're relying on changing the root password on multiple servers because someone has left, and then a few weeks later someone else leaves, it's all too easy for that task to be postponed until it's forgotten about.
The easier you make it to be secure, the more likely people are going to stay secure.
It's surprising how available 1GB connections are, if you can afford them of course.
Even in the little village my parents live in, now they've finally got a fibre connection (after years of <1MB ADSL) they could pick from a range of speeds. Of course, they're only paying for the cheapest tier, but I saw the price list and it was 'only' about £70 per month for a GB connection.
Still capitalism is great, eh Americans?
The argument is that, if there had been such a scheme, they would have been issued with documentation on arrival and obliged to keep it current, thus providing the evidential chain to confirm citizenship.
The Windrush started bringing people over from Jamaica in 1948, the world was a very different place then. If a boat full of people turned up these days, assuming they were allowed to stay, there would be much more documentation than just some landing cards, making ID cards superfluous.
I assumed that when the Windrush was brought up, it was as an example of how a current day problem (the government refusing to believe that some citizens were indeed citizens) could be fixed by ID cards. Not someone saying "well if we'd had ID cards seventy years ago things would have been different".
Of course, the people who came over on the Windrush were doing just fine, right up until the "hostile environment" was brought in at the Home Office. So if anything, they're an example of why we need less-Orwellian solutions, not more.
If there had been "a proper national ID system", it would have protected some of the Windrush victims, the authors argued.
How would it have protected them? Surely if they'd tried to apply for an ID card, the government would have said "you don't appear to be a citizen, and we should know because we threw away your boarding cards, so now we're going to deport you" (ie basically what happened when they accidentally came to the attention of the Home Office).
Or is that the reason for the word "some" in that sentence, because they knew that "some" might have been protected while the majority were not.
Still, at least it dispelled the notion that the Conservative party is only interested in what old people want. Now we know that they only care if you're old and white.