Re: The BOFH Strikes Again
The 'delay release' button is right next to the exit door, why stand there pressing the button when you can just leave? (unless you open the door and the corridor is on fire I suppose)
6738 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
I had to go in for 'health and safety training' at one of our data centres, and while talking us through what to do if the fire alarm goes off (turns out you should leave the building, good thing they told me that eh?), they told us that while you'd survive being in the room when the fire suppression went off (it uses some fancy new, non-deadly, chemical), you'd probably have both your ear drums ruptured by the air pressure suddenly increasing.
Why would they mention Airbus?
The first part is about Boeing and SpaceX's respective spacecraft, no Airbus involvement there.
The second part is about LRO taking pictures of Chang'e 4, again, neither built by Airbus.
The third part is about the ExoMars rover, that's being built by Thales.
The forth part is about Skyora, still no reason for Airbus to be name checked
And finally there's a few paragraphs about Virgin Galactic.
So which of these stories has an Airbus angle that elReg are cruelly censoring? The only space related Airbus news I can find is that they're building a satellite for a Japanese telecoms company, not really very interesting.
I'm surprised no-one has made a "SCSI emulator" out of an Arduino or RPi or something.
*EDIT* Of course someone has done it already
nationalenquirer.com. 59 IN A 52.7.189.0
nationalenquirer.com. 59 IN A 34.231.200.190
nationalenquirer.com. 299 IN NS ns-1168.awsdns-18.org.
nationalenquirer.com. 299 IN NS ns-1945.awsdns-51.co.uk.
nationalenquirer.com. 299 IN NS ns-349.awsdns-43.com.
nationalenquirer.com. 299 IN NS ns-619.awsdns-13.net.
nationalenquirer.com. 299 IN SOA ns-1168.awsdns-18.org. awsdns-hostmaster.amazon.com. 1 7200 900 1209600 86400
Let's all take a moment to feel slightly sorry for the IT admin at the National Enquirer, who's just found out that his boss has decided to piss of the guy who runs their hosting. I'm guessing they're thinking about a migration plan right now. Although if it was me, I'd quit and go work for someone who's not an arsehole, and leave them in the shit.
"The UK government and people of Ireland don't want a hard border, the EU do."
No, that's just wrong. The EU have been very clear that they don't want a hard border, because the Republic of Ireland is part of the EU, and it's their interests that the EU are negotiating on behalf of.
As for the UK government, their stated position might be that they don't want a hard border, but indevidual members of the government clearly wish that the Irish would sod off and stop getting in the way of their 'glorious brexit'.
"wonder if/when they next encounter a planetary body"
Given their orbit, the only planet they're likely to encounter in the next few thousand years is likely to be Mars, and when they do they'll burn up leaving nothing more than a tiny bit of soot.
Still, you seem to be worried, so lets do some maths:
Obviously we can't measure the size of all of space, but then we're only really interested in the bit around us, so lets imagine the disk of the solar system, out to Mars orbit, and because most stuff orbits in the same plane, we can imagine it as a disc only as thick as the Earth (12x10^6m).
So, radius of Mars orbit (ish, it's really an ellipse) is 228 million km, or 228x10^9m
The area of our disc would then be 1.63x10^23 m^2, and the total volume would be 3.7x10^31 cubic metres (that's 37000000000000000000000000000000 cubic metres, more or less).
If we assume that each one of these cube sats is one cubic metre (they're smaller than that, but it's close enough), I hope you can see that 1 into 3.7x10^31 is a tiny, tiny fraction. And this isn't even the whole solar system, it's just a thin slice of the area out as far as Mars.
Space really is quite large.
The prof unaccountably failed to say what a security researcher should do when the company they report the problem to does absolutely nothing.
I'd say that reporting (and demonstrating) it to the press, whilst not making any of the technical details public is a pretty responsible way of handling it. Perhaps Jack'd can be publicly shamed into fixing the problem even if they're not willing to fix it privately?
On the other hand, imagine how many more dates they'll be for people who fancy computer security experts, now that they'll all be making accounts to try and discover the flaw for themselves.
But in this case, if the Home Office lose, then Ofcom is free to ignore them about GSM gateways, and potentially other things.
And who knows how much of a precedence this will be? Possibly other parts of the government will feel free to ignore the Home Office's demands until they go all the way and get the law changed (which should result in our MPs making a democratic decision, but I doubt many people have much faith in MP's decision-making capabilities right now)
Or looking at it another way, a certain area has an elevated amount of reported crime. This could be because the residents trust the police more than in another area where there might be just as much crime, but the residents don't expect the police to do anything about it, so they don't bother reporting it.
The result of basing a strategy on previous crime stats in this situation would lead to the police patrolling the first area, but not the second, so the residents in the second area never come to trust the police, and are still the victims of (un/under-reported) crime.
Replication to what? Another server? Well la di dah look at mr fancy over here with his multiple servers!
We didn't have the budget for one database server, let alone two. It was all running on the same box as the application, and user files, and was probably a DC as well (in a cardboard box in the middle of the road, uphill through the snow both ways etc. etc.)
"the redundancies will not be along leave/remain lines"
I does seem that a lot of the areas that voted more strongly to leave the EU are likely to come of somewhat worse in the event of actually leaving the EU.
For example there's Cornwall, which voted 56% to leave, and currently receives around £60M per year from the EU.
The point of the backstop isn't about trade, it to avoid the situation of having an actual wall between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland, which is a key part of the Good Friday peace agreement.
Some days I miss the time I was working for a crappy PC manufacturer (coff Evesham coff), because I had access to all sorts of hardware, and no-one really cared about failure rates. Consequently I could test things, like "what happens when I plug this Pi into this memory slot?", to see what would happen.
Just FYI, if you pop the memory out of a computer while it's running, you get some pretty interesting patterns on the display, but no long term damage.
The only problem is, as the UK is on the west end of a continent, we'd have trouble launching to the east, in case any of our precious British rocket technology fall on and is stolen by those perfidious Europeans.
Instead all British satellites will be launched into a westward, retrograde, orbit!
Britain will proudly face in the opposite direction to all other countries!
I use whatever consumer drive I can buy cheaply, so that includes a couple of older Seagate drives, one of which has been making some nasty clicking noises for a few years now.
However, I'm not worried about data loss because I'm using RAID, and don't forget that the 'I' stands for 'inexpensive'.
If you want uptime, use some form of RAID, if you want your data, have backups, but you only need enterprise drives in a server that's run hard 24/7.
"but swinging tax hikes definitely don't work."
Except that tax rates in the US used to be even higher than 70% and they worked just fine then.
If you're going make an argument, try to pick something that's not explicitly disproved in the very article you're commenting on.