Re: Easily solved...
Even easier to solve than that. Just use an adblocker if you have to visit facebook.
6738 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
"Animal House ... Some Animals are more equal than others."
Erm, are you sure you don't mean Animal Farm, the 1945 book about the perils of revolutions being co-opted into a dictatorship by George Orwell, instead of Animal House, the 1978 National Lampoon film?
"Does Boeing provide training or do the individual airlines?"
The FAA agreed with Boeing that the changes between a 737 MAX 8 and the original 737-800 (first flown in 1997), were so small that no extra pilot training was required. Boeing performed many of the tests for the type certification themselves and the FAA accepted the results. (That link is worth a read for a more in depth look at how the certification process worked in this case)
So, Boeing would provide the training if requested, but they told the airlines that their pilots would not need training on the 737-MAX if they were already qualified on the 737-800, and this was backed up by the FAA.
So to answer your question, it's Boeing's fault for saying that pilots wouldn't need additional training covering MCAS, and the FAA's for believing them.
Well, like you say, the police are cash strapped. Austerity dontcherknow.
What's that, MPs just got a 2.7% pay rise? I'm sure that's totally justified. Totally.
It's a great idea. We all know how poorly different vendors' equipment interoperates, so this will be nicely secure.
It doesn't matter if the PLA have pwned your core routers if they can't communicate with anything else on the network because the manufacturers have all interpreted the 'standard' differently.
Either wrap it around a big chunk of ballistics gel, or failing that, just use a dead pig or something.
Oh, and probably best not to mix alcohol and firearms, but hey, just think of it as evolution in action.
Of course, once you've shot it, it's now useless, so you're going to have to buy a new one.
"The money they pay in tax is taken from the customer, and if that customer is not at the end of the selling line, they simply add it on to whoever they sell to"
If that's true, then when the government reduces tax on a company, it's products should get cheaper for the end consumer.
Well, someone's intelligence organisation is having budget problems, because it's 'only' $200,000 + $14,000 per year to buy membership there, which presumably entitles one to use the pool whenever one feels like it.
Perhaps Ms Zhang was taking Groucho Marx's advice "I don't care to belong to any club that will have me as a member".
It doesn't cover airports or embassies, but "100 miles form the coast" still covers about half of California, and all of Florida, Maine, Massachusetts, Vermont etc. IIRC it's not that the constitution doesn't apply, but border patrol officers don't think it applies within 100 miles which amounts to exactly the same thing (if you've been locked in a cell with no means of communications, it doesn't matter if it's technically illegal or not, you're still locked in a cell).
I've never even been to the US and I knew about it, I assumed it was wider knowledge.
I suspect that'll be a lot less of a problem than you might think, because these will be used in servers and will probably only be powered down a handful of times in their entire lives. Also, BGA is fine if it's manufactured well.
It's much more of a problem if a cheaply built chip is in a games console that's going through big thermal cycles every day.
Theoretically local laws apply, for example there's the case of a certain large US based email provider who had a data centre in Ireland, and refused to hand over emails from that data centre to the US government, and went to court for years to deny them.
Mind you, not every company can be as principled as Microsoft ;)
"Amazon, a USA company"
Funny, all the money I pay them seems to go to Amazon Sarl in Luxembourg.
Jam both the encrypted, and non-encrypted parts of the signal, and then broadcast your spoofed (unencrypted) signal. I'll bet that most receivers will fall back to using the unencrypted signal if that's all they can receive, and most probably won't even alert the user. Even if the special military GPS goes down, your average squaddie will just pull out their mobile and use the GPS on that.
And sure, people can always fall back to a map and compass, but if their GPS looks like it's working they'll probably follow that, or at best, spend some time trying to work out which navigation methods they can rely on. Being able to delay and confuse an enemy is useful.
What I can't work out is how the brother got hold of the texts in the first place. I can imagine the sister potentially mentioning that she was having an affair with the worlds richest man (you would wouldn't you), but who the hell shares their sex texts with their sibling?
I might tell my brothers if I'm fucking someone, but I wouldn't let them see my nudes. Equally, I wouldn't leave my phone around unlocked where anyone, family or not, could get into it.
"Never understood the Coldplay hate."
Simple, they got popular. People hate bands that get popular (partly I think because shitty radio stations constantly play the same two songs until everyone is fed up), mainly because it's cool to hate the mainstream.
Any of their contemporaries would have had the same reception if they'd not mostly slipped into blameless obscurity.
The yanks are getting reliably good at it now though.
They've just tested a pair of satellite kill vehicles against an incoming ballistic missile. First one hit and destroyed it, then the follow up shot aimed for the largest bit of debris left and splatted that too for good measure.
Of course, it was their test missile, so they knew where it was supposed to be, but still, hitting it twice on an incoming trajectory is pretty impressive.
"Was this a <three letter acronym> back door?"
No it was a misjudged attempt to bring features that were usually reserved for the lights-out management system in servers, down to the desktop level to make it easier for admins to administer large numbers of machines. (eg, Imagine you had to update the EFI on a thousand desktops, you can rack up the overtime walking round all the offices, or use ME to schedule it overnight and head down the pub).
Why they thought it was a good idea to bring to all of their CPUs rather than just a subset I don't know. Laziness?
On of my friends took it upon themself to change the CD in my car, while I'd got out for a moment.
I came back to find them complaining that the machine wouldn't accept it, and a CD (not mine fortunately), jammed most of the way into the gap above the stereo.
It was scratched to buggery so at least I didn't have to listen to their music.
"if any was passed to Snowden/Assange/Manning/etc?"
Snowden and Manning both took information themselves, they weren't sent it by other people. Assange relies on other people sending him information, but as he's not reposted it we can safely assume that he didn't receive it. (Also the US government would be making more of a fuss if Martin had shared the info).
"Drives affected generally stop responding after a reboot"
Sounds basic, but test with a different (known good) power supply. Power supply problems can cause the weirdest fault conditions.
S.M.A.R.T. on the other hand, is pretty useful.
I've seen other malware-infused documents which start with instructions on how to enable and run macros (eg). (I'm not sure if that's the case here, but it wouldn't surprise me)
I guess it does restrict the malware to people who are able to follow simple instructions to enable macros, and yet are stupid enough to do so, but the internet is a big place and there's no shortage of idiots.
Could have been worse, the swan could have come to Bristol.
I'm red/green colour-blind, and like most other colour-blind people, I can still easily tell the difference between red and green.
The two situations that I've not been able to clearly see a difference between red and green are are:
1) In an Ishihara test
2) In very low light, when it's so dark that even fully sighted people are having to squint to distinguish colours.
It's generally a much less severe condition than most people think.
I have heard of ChooseCo before, but only in the context of them aggressively suing anyone who used the phrase "choose your own adventure", without (TM)-ing it to them.
In fact, if Netflix lose, I could see Brooker fixing the problem by just inserting a scene where the character stares straight into the camera, and says "'choose your own adventure' is a trademark of ChooseCo", and then cuts back.
"I would say that netflix [..] chose to infringe"
More likely the writers assumed that "Choose your own adventure" was not a trademark, because, lets face it, who would be so venial as to trademark something like that? (well, in retrospect, ChooseCo would).
By the time they realised that there was a litigious company out there tha,t and that it was indeed a trademark, they were too far through to stop, and probably forgot that a character uses the exact words "Choose your own adventure book" at one point.
As far as I can tell, examples are not used in man
pages for commands anywhere in linux (which is odd because they're recommended in the style guide for man). Many commands don't even include a simple description in the DESCRIPTION part of their man
file (for example, less
, which proudly informs you that it is similar to more
but has 'many more features'. Alas, nowhere does it mention that it's a program for displaying the contents of a file).
So I suspect that even if I did show up with some new documentation containing lovely examples of how commands should, and can be used, they'd be thrown out as 'not being in the spirit'.
Compare and contrast when practicality rather than ideology is the driver between writing documentation, eg.