Re: Looks like we're still relying on Bruce
Think of it as getting revenge for the dinosaurs
6732 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
Although it does beg the questions, how do you measure the "most safety and privacy users" [sic], and how many people do the categorise as 'most', and what proportion of those are teenagers (and how sure are they that the ages are correct?).
Or did they just sort their list by "length of password" (that's basically the same as 'most safety', right?), and find some (purported) teenagers in the top 50%?
Mind you, I'm assuming that Facebook would say something misleading but technically correct, rather than just straight up lying.
This is an uninformed guess, but it could be because they've moved the consumer Hotmail over to the same system that Office365 uses (ie Exchage), which allows administrators (or whoever has been granted permission) access to mailboxes.
I'm still not sure why a customer agent needs access to a mailbox, but I'd be willing to believe it was just a screw up assigning permissions.
Surely the logical extrapolation will be for the US to stop defining humans as 'people', thus leaving corporations as the only legal residents of the United States. After all, they already have most of the power just by bribing lobbying politicians, so really it would just be legitimising the current order.
I think Gio is talking about the walking spoonerism, Jeremy Hunt.
Did I type that correctly? Ah, good. Wouldn't it be just awful if I spelt his surname with a 'C'?
Even Prof. Stephen Hawking thought he was a cunt.
"The reason for using test pilots back in those days was that they were considered to be expendable monkeys"
Expendable possibly, but certainly not monkeys. The selection process for the Mercury 7 was looking for candidates with a bachelor's degree or better. When they landed on the moon, Neil Armstrong had a Master's degree, and Buzz Aldrin had a doctorate (he wrote his thesis on "Line-of-Sight Guidance Techniques for Manned Orbital Rendezvous", which obviously came in handy).
Test pilots in those days were expected to be engineers as well as pilots, especially in the more cutting edge programs like the X-15, which several astronauts were selected from.
Someone might be able to argue that perhaps they had a non-terrorism related reason for looking at a map. Maybe.
On the other hand, what about these interactive maps showing oil and gas, pipelines and storage, in the UK? Surely of interest to terrorists right?
And all of this published by those notorious enablers of terrorism, erm, the Oil and Gas Authority, a UK government agency...
For my friend's birthday I used several manufactured devices that produced a broad spectrum of EM waves in all directions, deriving their energy from an uncontained exothermic reaction, just to liven the place up a bit.
Fortunately they were able to blow the candles out with out any problems.
Our office server room (most kit is in a data centre or 'the cloud' now), still has a "Clean" power circuit, despite everything getting power via a UPS these days.
(Of course, being an old server room there's about five different UPSs, ranging from a big 8kVA unit, to a tiny four socket one. All are of varying ages and manufactures, but of course much of the equipment it powers is old and only has one PSU, so none of it can be swapped onto the newer, larger models for fear of it never powering up again.
But that's a rant for another day.)
Not necessarily, using airbags (like Mars Pathfinder), still counts as lithobraking. As long as your probe (why don't we call them what they really are, space robots!) uses and impact to slow it down, I guess that would count, so airbags, springs, crumple structure so all count.
Although I suppose if you look at it that way, any probe that drops the last few inches might count as lithobraking...
Didn't Eisenhower mention it was happening fifty something years ago? I've no idea how old you are but this has been the case in the US for most of your life, how come you've only noticed now?
Things like due process get in the way of making money, and the US is all about making money, so, "out with due process".
First the US have to get their hands on him, and once the Met are finished with him for bail jumping, it looks like he's off to Sweden to face his original charges. He's less likely to get extradited to the US from Sweden than he is from the UK.
Hopefully the Swedes just ship him back to Australia where he can live in ignominy (and maybe pay some child support). He'd hate it much more if it turned out the world doesn't actually give a shit about him.
"there is certainly a lot more to this story than the first bunch of El'reg commentards have mentioned, either deliberately, or accidentally lightweight in world news 'actuality'"
I see everyone who disagrees with me as either a government stooge or an imbecile as well, it's always a good way to have a calm discussion.
That's a big postcard, what do you need all that for?
In the UK, for the majority of people who's only source of income is their wage, their employer calculates their tax and sends it to the tax man (HMRC). That's it. Done.
At the end of the year you get a single page from them saying "this year you earned £X and you were taxed £Y and National Insurance of £Z". I keep these letters but I've never needed them for anything so I could probably chuck 'em.
The only time I had to do any more than that was when I started my first full time job after a period of doing odd jobs etc. I had to ring to get my new tax code, which took five minutes, and when it changed again, my employer sorted it for me.
Another minor correction:
"The government calculates the tax rate – and in many cases the entire filing process takes only a few minutes, as opposed to the hours and sometimes days that an American IRS filing takes."
In the UK most people don't have to file their own taxes (our employer pays our taxes for us), so it takes us zero minutes.
If you can't be bothered to find whatever character map software your OS has, just go to a search engine and search for "greek letter nu", and copy paste from there. ν
(I do this every time I need to use the € symbol)
"And this _is_ the dealbreaker... (I assume Win-10-nic 'Home' also cannot run it?)"
According to wikipedia, all the main* versions of Win10 have a 64 bit version, so yeah, all versions of Win10 should be able to run WSL as far as I can see (there's certainly people out there who've installed it on Home with no problems).
* That would be Home, Pro, Pro Education, Education, and Enterprise. I can't see a way for a normal user to buy any of the other versions like IoT or mobile so who the fuck knows eh?
WSL allows you to run actual linux programs without re-compiling them (you can just apt install whatever
), and because of this, if there's an update for (eg) openssh, you can download it as soon as it reaches the repositories instead of compiling from scratch or waiting for someone else to do so.
Think of it as being sort of the inverse of WINE.
PS, WSL doesn't require the Windows Store (src), or a Microsoft login, or Win 10 Pro. You do need to be on a 64bit version of Win10 or Server2019 though.
To be fair, what MS call "Modern Auth" is just a standards compliant implementation of OAuth2, which was first published in 2012, and is used by loads of providers (including GMail).
If they'd stuck with some out of date protocol they'd have been slated for being insecure. If they mandated OAuth2 then people would complain about backwards compatibility with old software. Instead they allowed the email admins the choice, and get criticised for being both insecure and incompatible.
"at least 5% will pick really dumb passwords"
They will, but that's partly the admin's fault too. Office365 allows custom password complexity policies, along with a couple of sensible default options.
Phone (and tablet) manufacturers don't take toddlers into account in their security models.
Pass codes or patterns can be learnt, face unlock is trivial to bypass (hold the phone up to mummy or daddies face then run away), and for fingerprint locks just wait until daddy has fallen asleep on the sofa and gently 'borrow' a finger.
Clearly the solution is a feature similar to face unlock, but which requires a view of a tidied room before it will unlock. Sure, the kids can bypass it, but they'll have to clean their room first ;)
"I'm sure this must of been an issue before hand with just R/C Aircraft, cars" [sic]
It wasn't a problem before, because R/C vehicles were much more expensive, and much less capable.
Twenty years ago a remote control helicopter cost the best part of $2000, required the owner to assemble it all, and was at least as difficult to fly as a full sized machine. These days you can spend less than £100 on something which will outclass it in every way, whilst also being flyable by an amateur, and probably with an autopilot.
PS, it's "must have been", not "must of been"
I notice that elReg's resident AI, amanfrommars1, made their first post (or at least the earliest I can find) in June 2009.
Are you doing anything special for your decadal anniversary amfm? Perhaps we could club together and buy you some more RAM?
"one proposed method for dealing with electric car fires is to submerse the entire car in water"
One of the few times I've been mildly impressed by a salesdroid. They were demo-ing an Equalogic SAN, and showed that when it was running you could just grab one of the controllers and pull it out and it would seamlessly fail to the other one (ditto power etc.).
I was less impressed with an HP blade enclosure that I was expecting to run on three PSUs while I re-routed a power cable. Yep, that thing died hard. It turned out one of the PSUs was bad and could only handle about 1/3rd of it's rated load.
Nice to see a British company trying to enter the small launcher market, but I do wonder what they've got that none of the their tens of competitors do. Especially as several of their competitors (eg RocketLab) are already launching payloads for paying clients, which in the rocketry business is quite unusual.
I've heard of hundreds of companies that have billed themselves as the next big thing in rocketry. Maybe 5% of those manage to build some kind of actual hardware. Ten percent of those actually launch something (this is where Skyrora have reached, a whopping 6km of altitude). Practically no rocket company makes the final step which is to actually (successfully) launch something for a paying customer.
As far as I know, no company has managed all of the above and also made a profit from purely commercial customers (if you can convince a government to give you money then you just might make it, eg ULA, SpaceX).
"we have to have public healthcare via the NHS, policing via, well, the police, and passports from the passport office etc etc It's a monopoly provision"
Well privatisation is all the rage these days, so if you're really lucky some of these services in your local area will be taken over by Capita.
I bet you can't wait.
"Animal House ... Some Animals are more equal than others."
Erm, are you sure you don't mean Animal Farm, the 1945 book about the perils of revolutions being co-opted into a dictatorship by George Orwell, instead of Animal House, the 1978 National Lampoon film?
"Does Boeing provide training or do the individual airlines?"
The FAA agreed with Boeing that the changes between a 737 MAX 8 and the original 737-800 (first flown in 1997), were so small that no extra pilot training was required. Boeing performed many of the tests for the type certification themselves and the FAA accepted the results. (That link is worth a read for a more in depth look at how the certification process worked in this case)
So, Boeing would provide the training if requested, but they told the airlines that their pilots would not need training on the 737-MAX if they were already qualified on the 737-800, and this was backed up by the FAA.
So to answer your question, it's Boeing's fault for saying that pilots wouldn't need additional training covering MCAS, and the FAA's for believing them.
Well, like you say, the police are cash strapped. Austerity dontcherknow.
What's that, MPs just got a 2.7% pay rise? I'm sure that's totally justified. Totally.
It's a great idea. We all know how poorly different vendors' equipment interoperates, so this will be nicely secure.
It doesn't matter if the PLA have pwned your core routers if they can't communicate with anything else on the network because the manufacturers have all interpreted the 'standard' differently.
Either wrap it around a big chunk of ballistics gel, or failing that, just use a dead pig or something.
Oh, and probably best not to mix alcohol and firearms, but hey, just think of it as evolution in action.
Of course, once you've shot it, it's now useless, so you're going to have to buy a new one.