That was my first thought, but a more limiting factor would be if you got a flat battery.
(Especially as the ones on the moon buggies were non-rechargeable).
6738 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
On a completely different note, the picture accompanying the article is named us_army.jpg
, but the aircraft flying over look a lot more like Mig-29s to me.
Anyone else got a better ID?
"it's hardware upgrade time"
It doesn't have to be, all you need to do is to make sure that your CPU is only running one thread at a time. Then, after each thread has run, remove power from the computer for five minutes to make sure all the various caches and buffers have time to reset, then you're completely safe to run an new thread, with no danger of information being intercepted. Simples!
In high security environments you may wish to physically destroy the CPU, and replace it with a new one in between each thread, but that's getting a little paranoid.
If you still have XP machines that you can't get rid of, ideally you should just keep them off the network. Failing that, lock them down behind the tightest possible firewall (and I mean a separate firewall, don't rely on the XP one), only allowing traffic on the bare minimum of ports. Perhaps investigate if they can live on their own separate network, only connected to a second NIC on a more secure computer which is in turn connected to the wider network.
You don't vote for laws in the UK, you vote for an MP who you hope will go to parliament and vote in the way that you want, same as most other democracies.
Otherwise every single attempt to change a law would end up turning into a brexit, and nothing would ever get done.
(If you actually do care and you're not just trolling, you could go through the policy consultations and see who HMRC actually did ask about this.)
Indeed. The idea is actually really good.
On the other hand, I assume the implementation will be terrible, if it ever happens at all, and given Capita's reputation, will somehow end up costing the taxpayer. (I know this is an internal matter, but somehow they'll find a way to cost taxpayers regardless).
In case you were wondering where that extra $1.6B is coming from:
"However, three sources told Ars that, as of Monday, the White House plans to pay the additional $1.6 billion for the lunar program by cutting the Pell Grant Reserve Fund, which helps low-income students pay for college."
"But this is not the core reason why the "pros" remain with Adobe."
It's because they have a tool that works, and they're not interested in learning another.
It's a good example of the differences between how It types differ from a lot of other professions, because learning new tools is part of the point of the job.
(Not all print is Adobe based, there's still pockets of CorelDraw in the signmaking world.)
Bean-counters are responsible for our salaries being paid, so personally I always try to keep them happy.
And of course, if they do become a problem, just throw a handful of small objects like beans or pebbles and run away, because accountants are compelled to count everything they see. Or is that vampires?
But obviously the Swedes are so much more closely aligned with US, what with their 'Special Relationship', and shared language and everything, they were much more likely to give in to an extradition request from the US, so fleeing to the neutral UK made much more sense.
Wait, I think I might have made a mistake somewhere above...
"trust a driverless car programmed in sunny California"
It's not just the weather, who's going to trust a car programmed to drive on roads that were laid out probably in the last hundred years?
On this side of the pond half our road network still follows paths laid down two thousand years ago, and you can bet the Romans weren't thinking about robo-cars when they built roads.
"Someone from Govan [...] sounds nothing like someone from Milngavie or Bearsden"
They do though. Even compared to (say) an Edinburgh accent. Locals will always be able to spot the differences though.
I'd assume that most people can't tell the difference between a Gloucestershire, Bristol, and a Somerset accent if yer not from round these parts.
The RL-10 is an expander cycle engine. That is, it warms up some of the fuel by passing it through the nozzle (thus keeping the nozzle from melting), and uses the now expanded, gaseous(?), fuel to power the turbo-pump, which pumps the fuel and oxidiser into the engine.
The BE-7 is a dual expander cycle engine. So it heats up the fuel to run the fuel pump, but also separately warms up the oxidiser (liquid oxygen) to run a separate pump for the main oxidiser supply, this ends up making the plumbing simpler, and more robust (because the fuel and oxidiser circuits can be kept separate).
This difference might help make the BE-7 more efficient (although I'm assuming that a clean slate design using modern materials and construction techniques will also help), but it will also make the BE-7 more reusable (not something the RL-10's designers cared about).
tl/dr because it's a new, modern, design, the BE-7 is likely to be simpler and more efficient than the venerable RL-10.
If you prefer more visual information, Scott Manley does a much better job of explaining it in this video.
I can imagine someone forgetting to turn off double sided printing, but how did they manage to put so many in envelopes and send them to customers without anyone noticing at any point that they had two different letters on one piece of paper?
Surely multiple people must have held the paper in their hands and looked at it?
London is the capital city of both England and Britain, and as referring to it as 'London, Britain' includes both England and Britain, that's the phrasing I use.
It's the same as saying that SATA is a connection used for hard drives, or saying that it's used for storage devices (also including CDROM, SSD's etc.).
One is a subset of the other, so I'll go for the phrasing that includes all possible uses.
"So why are people from England told we should call ourselves British, or risk being brought up on racial discrimination charges?"
That's complete bollocks. And that's not how discrimination works (you can't discriminate against yourself). And calling yourself 'English' is not an offence under the Equality Act 2010, you can call yourself 'Marmalade Fuckface' if you like, it's how you treat other people that's potentially infringing.
(Of course, if you did feel like discriminating against someone on the basis of their nationality you could just pop over to Europe. UK laws are more stringent on that front).
"Until the Lisbon Treaty removes nation-state status in 2020"
The Lisbon Treaty was ratified in 2009 and doesn't have anything to say about the names of countries.
(It did include provisions for countries to leave the EU though, so we do have the Lisbon Treaty to thank for brexit)
"Funny how the Remoaners always fail to mention that little part of the plan"
Because it's made-up lies, the same way no-one complains about how the EU is going to turn us all into small pink ducks, because it's not sodding true.
"In the first meeting of the international committee, held last Fall in London, England,"
For a UK based website surely that should read "In the first meeting of the international committee, held last autumn in London"?
(And if you really insist on disambiguating London, the country should be 'Britain', or the 'UK').
If you had children who would otherwise spend all their time complaining about how bored they are?
If you decided to have movie night with your friends, but outside?
There's two answers I came up with in less time than they took to type, I'm sure if you actually used your brain you'd think of some more.
"As for mass extinctions, WTF ? Such as ?"
Depends when you're talking. Things like mammoths, mastodon etc. died out suspiciously close to the time that the first humans arrived in the Americas, but we don't know for sure. More recently however, European settlers managed to wipe out the Passenger pigeon, and almost wiped out the buffalo among other species.
You know what, this is a perfect opportunity to just link to the list of animals in North America that have gone extinct since people turned up. It's a pretty long list.
As for habitat destruction, that's still going on as well, and at a much greater rate than rewilding is going on. This bit of research estimates that in the Western US alone, a 'football'* field of previously natural land was lost every two and half minutes between 2001 and 2011.
I'm not intending to single the US out here, it's much the same in Europe (except most of the habitat was lost a thousand years ago, not fifty), and as the bit about the mammoths shows, humans are just fucking bad news for almost every other species on the planet as soon as they turn up somewhere.
* I assume they mean an American football field, which is 90x50m for the rest of us.
"Plenty of people probably don't even realise the new 3 device limit change."
I didn't realise. Mind you, we pay for the enterprise version at work, and that doesn't have those limitations. Personally I don't have much of a problem with them limiting the free version, you get what you pay for after all.
One example would be that many parts of the Saturn V were hand built, in ways that nobody really practises any more, because we have better ways of doing it.
For example, the guidance system uses core rope memory, and there's probably about five people in the world who could could wire one of those up, but then these days we'd use something solid state instead which is faster, cheaper, more robust and with more capacity in a smaller package. (ditto every other piece of electronics on the SV)
For another example, much of the F1 engine is hand welded, and not many people have those welding skills any more, so instead you'd have to redesign it to use a more modern design that can be welded (better) by a machine. But if you're already redesigning that much of the engine, why not update other parts as well, until you end up with a completely different engine. By that point, you might as well design a new rocket that actually does what's required, rather than trying to fit your mission around what the Saturn V can/could do.
"Obviously SpaceX have got their new intra-vehicular suit for Crew Dragon launch"
Boeing have their own design for their Starliner too. As with the SpaceX one, it's a flight suit, not an EVA suit, and unlike SpaceX, they've actually let other people touch it.
No news yet if you have to pay extra to get the model with the O2 warning light...
If you're worried about Microsoft code being used in the Linux kernel, you're a few years late.
A CLI is great when you know ahead of time what information you want to be displayed (and any bulk, or repetitive tasks).
A GUI is better for more investigative tasks (ie problem solving) where you don't know that you need something until you look at it.
The both have their place, and which you use most is more down to what your job involves.
There's a partial exception in the GDPR for police work, so standard GDPR rules may not apply.
There's more information from the government here, but I think you'd have to be better versed in UK data legislation than me in order to make much sense of it.
"casts a poor light on the whole concept of self certification"
The trouble is it would cost NASA $$$ to be testing every part they receive from suppliers (even ignoring destructive tests). Testing (eg) every single rivet you buy is unsustainable, at some point you have to start trusting people.
As it says in TFA, they already test some parts, they just need to expand that, and maybe add some more random spot checks to keep their suppliers honest. Trust, but verify.
Ah, that's one of those youtube channels which takes the public videos from Blue Origin (or SapceX, or NASA), and then stream them on constant rotation, whilst pretending to be an official live stream.
I suppose it's an easy way to rake in ad money without actually creating anything of your own.
"the whole thing was to extradite him to the US"
If the US had tried to extradite him from Sweden there's a good chance they'd have failed (short version, Sweden doesn't allow 'political' extraditions). That said, they could have just applied to Sweden for extradition, there would be nothing to gain from 'faking rape charges' as some of his supporters seem to think.
Instead he ran to the UK completely voluntarily, despite the fact that the UK is probably one of the countries in Europe most likely to extradite to the US. So he's made things worse for himself there.
You'll also notice that during the two years that he was on bail in the UK, the US didn't try to get him extradited. That's clearly a decision they've made since 2012, so no "the whole thing" wasn't to extradite him to the US. They've just take advantage of his string of bad decisions.
At least a potential attacker would need a valid username and password to access the telnet port*, rather than anyone being able to use the ssh flaw on any affected Cisco once they knew the hard-coded credentials.
* which they could grab unencrypted from the wire if they had access and someone actually logged in over telnet, which is why telnet is bad.
"Sure there is a ton of money to be made from SaaS.
Does anyone think Oracle can deliver that?"
Of course they can.
Their old business model was based around screwing customers over with their licensing terms. Once their customers are in the cloud there's nowhere for them to hide, and Oracle will be able to audit their license compliance at any minute of the day, and hold a customer's servers to ransom.
SaaS just makes it easier for Oracle to fuck over it's customers.
"hurr durr statistics how do they work?"
So, you lose points for picking a paywalled source, but here's the source the Washington Post used. I'm guessing you didn't use that because they have a big quote that show's quite how disingenuous your comment was:
"Police killed 1,147 people in 2017. Black people were 25% of those killed despite being only 13% of the population." (emphasis mine).
So if you're in the US, and you have dark skin, you're three times more likely to be shot by US security forces. I won't call them police, because quite frankly the word means something different over here, something less shooty.
I decided to have a little "what if" upgrade check and came up with the idea of buying a 1600X (or other high end Ryzen 1 chip) for cheap off ebay, pairing it with a high end AM4 motherboard, and then upgrading to Ryzen 3 when they actually come out.
There's a lot to be said for AMD keeping the same sockets for (*gasp* from the Intel fans) more than one generation of CPU. All I'd have to do is swap out the CPU, which is not a situation I've been in for years.