Re: Nice headline
For some reason I thought "Move Any Mountain" was by the KLF, thanks for putting me straight.
6734 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
Such a safe pair of hands that they (allegedly) threatened to pull out unless NASA gave them more money.
Somehow those newbies at SpaceX seem to be able to provide the exact same service for much less money. Clearly they're not spending enough on bribing lobbying.
"the only people carrying weapons in any manner are doing so illegally."
You can walk down the road with your perfectly legal shotgun in a carry-bag on your back (I wouldn't be surprised if you had to have a trigger lock or something fitted though). It's not technically visible, but it's really obvious that it's a firearm.
The thing about a 3d printed gun, or indeed any sort of gun, is that it's useless without ammunition.
In the UK (for example) you need a firearms license in order to buy ammunition (or smokeless powder), so it doesn't matter if you've got a 3d printed gun, or a fully working Glock. It's only of use as a blunt instrument without ammo (although the police will still be very, very, annoyed with you either way).
And yes, making old style gun powder is possible at home, but it doesn't actually make a very good propellant. Oh yeah, and good luck printing primers.
(Finally, if you have the level of technical knowhow to print a working gun, then you could equally build a metal 'zip gun' from plumbing supplies, which would probably work better.)
If the store had left the knife lying around and the doors unlocked, would they be negligent then?
Or in this case, should Morrisons have had more internal controls and auditing to stop a rogue employee from being able to as easily steal their data?
It's a tricky question, I don't know what the answers to those questions are, but I believe that's what the court is trying to find out.
I think elReg wanted to remind us of that, so they don't have to block as many comments.
As this is an ongoing trial, and elReg is a British based publication, they have to make sure us commentards don't say anything libellous, and I think their mods take a "block first" line.
Hey now, the parachute didn't fail, it was whoever's job it was to correctly insert the pin which attached the main parachute to it's drogue that failed.
And everyone who's job it was to check that the parachutes were connected to their drogues, they failed too.
And possibly whoever designed a system that perhaps made it too easy to not properly connect the etc.
(And everyone who reviewed and signed off on that design and so on and so forth.)
What I'm getting at is that it's less a problem with the systems, and more a culture of failure and insufficient checks.
Surely the drug cartels would be the customers of those services? What with them being the ones with money, and also in need of such services?
The providers would be any poor shmuck on a minimum wage, who gets a five minute training course in biowaste disposal (which they're charged for) and has to haul the corpses in their own car, perhaps while dropping the kids off at school because taking time off to do that would otherwise eat into the pittance they're given, that is laughingly called a 'wage'.
All while the Uber execs insist that it's not the companies fault that bodies are being dumped in parks, it's instead the actions of "a few independent contractors", who had Uber stickers on their car, and on their corporate branded clothes, and on their pittance cheques, as it's certainly not the exec's fault that their algorithms gave their modern-day-serfs only a couple of minutes between corpse pickups, on a route that took them right by a public park...
"Are BT trying to pawn of that FTTC is actually FTTP in some places?"
Not quite, but they say things like "get the advantages of fibre internet in your home", which is sort of correct, FTTC is generally better than a bit of wet string/ADSL, but it does imply that the fibre is coming all the way into your home, rather than stopping just up the road.
Alas, BT and their lawyers know exactly how far they can bend the truth in advertising, without crossing over into an actual falsehood.
The AGC was a cool bit of kit, and probably could have landed the LEM by itself, on a good day and with flat terrain. As it was, every single lunar landing was hand piloted.
What the AGC couldn't do, was land accurately enough to hit (for example) a 50x100m barge in the middle of an ocean.
The other advantage the LEM had was that the descent engine could be throttled a lot (most rocket engines can only throttle between 80-100% of max thrust), all the way down to 10% thrust. The Space X Merlin, while it can throttle down to 70% , that's still a thrust to weight ration of more than 1, ie, it's incapable of hovering. This means that to land, not only does it have to deal with all the problems of being pretty much the wrong shape to land (like balancing a pole vertically), an inconsistent atmosphere with wind to push it around, much smaller landing areas, it also has to time it's 'suicide burn' so that the rate of de-acceleration is perfectly calculated to have it moving at 0m/s exactly at altitude = 0m.
If it is still going too fast it crashes (obviously), but if it's going too slow then it will start going back upwards (and would presumably have to then cut engines and try again somehow).
Finally it has to do all of this whilst being cost-effective enough that they can make money by re-flying that stage again and again.
So yes, the LEM and the AGC were massive triumphs, but modern rocketry has come on leaps and bounds, and while automated landings might look the same from the outside, the level of difficulty is an order of magnitude higher.
Even if you are doing regular backups, in a lot of cases the backup medium will either be a USB disk that is left plugged in, or some kind of network storage.
In both cases any malware that gets root access will have access to this storage, and may well try to encrypt the backups, and any other storage it can get access to.
So to avoid this you either have to physically unplug your backup disk (and hopefully store it in a fire safe or offsite), or perhaps have your network storage move completed backups to a separate area that the infected machine doesn't have access to.
"The highest number of offenders were reported by Surrey Police"
There's two ways to interpret that: Either Surry Police have the most officers who like browsing through other people's private data, or (more likely imo) Surry Police actually have a better system for detecting such activity, and aren't just sweeping it under the rug.
Just don't give it any weapons, otherwise US police will use it to kill people. In fact, they're probably try even if it doesn't have weapons.
"Free movement of people is a population issue to me, not a 'foreigners' one. It's disappointing how few people can differentiate these things."
Well that's the point isn't it? Most people who don't want freedom of movement want it stopped for entirely racist reasons. That's not the case for you, congratulations, but you're in a very small, and quiet, minority.
This story is a perfect example; UKIP are entirely happy to have someone standing as an MP for them, even though he's only lived in this country for two years. Apparently purely because he's rich (I'm basing that on how much they go on about the companies he's worked at).
On the other hand, how many of their MPs are people who've spent their entire life living and working in the UK, but happen to be called (eg) Sajid? I'm going to guess none.
Their selection criteria is clearly not based on a disagreement with freedom of movement on population grounds, it's just based on race.
It makes sense if you're dealing with firearms which are merely "deactivated", ie barely anything done to prevent them firing, and easily reversed by criminals.
There's much less need for it in the UK because our deactivation standards are much more stringent. Arguably pushing those stronger standards to the rest of Europe would have made more sense, but I doubt the EU is interested in any bright ideas coming from the UK at the moment.
I had a Win98 computer when I was a kid, and a little later I had a WinME one, and honestly the ME machine was very slightly more stable.
If I had to guess, the ME machine probably just got lucky and had slightly better behaved hardware and drivers.
As an OS they were basically interchangeable apart from the icons.
"I would have liked to symlink [...] if the facility had existed in Windows"
Symlinks that work much the same as Linux have existed since Vista, and NTFS junction points (basically the same end result) have been around since 2000/XP. There's specific group policies (since XP) to move the user's folders onto a network share.
I had this problem with a user, except with email archives. Many were the emails I sent out, instructing people on how to keep their archives somewhere they'd be backed up, I even offered to come round and do it for them if they wanted. Many ignored me, until one day, someone in marketing (always the worst for not listening I find) had an HD problem that corrupted their email archive.
I took a look at it, and lo and behold Outlook was refusing to open the PST containing the files she needed, and all I could do was point out thatthis was why I'd been asking them to archive their emails properly.
She promptly burst into tears (only time I've made someone at work cry I hope), but there wasn't much to be done.
Until I spent most of the afternoon with a variety of PST recovery tools which finally managed to unbork it to the extent that Outlook would load the emails.
Didn't get much of a thank you tho :(
At least the US government hasn't banned selling weapons to the Saudis, and then "accidentally" sold them anyway. "By mistake". At least three times.
After all, who among us hasn't accidentally written an illegal export license eh?
But what if your spouse is from a foreign country, surely pressure might be put on you then? Or perhaps one of your kids is involved with someone from another country? Or maybe they just try and bribe someone?
Proper internal security with auditing and someone actually reading and responding to the audit logs is the answer, not banning foreign hires.
Or to put it more cynically, currently Feinstein can make political hay out of beating on the NSA about privacy issues (quite rightly imo). If they actually have a hidden, but real, justification, it puts her in a difficult political position of dropping her crusade against the NSA, but being unable to say why.
And, to be fair, if the NSA did have some real successes, there's really nothing to stop them at least mentioning them in general terms in public, and then giving a more full briefing in closed session, so to my mind at least, they probably don't have any obvious examples to give, probably just useful, but non-essential confirmation for information from other sources.
The Dutch tried using eagles to control drones, but it turned out that the eagles were almost impossible to train.
"because the assembly had been done in a hurry"
Heh, it wasn't filled with stickers then? Or looked like someone had decided to use an entire box of cable ties ensuring zero movement on any cable? Or like they'd tried to use as few cable ties as possible, so all the cables were in a single bundle? Or with the inside of the case wall-papered with 'Intel Inside' stickers?
It was a boring-ass job and we had to find a way to have fun without going insane. There's probably a worrying number of them out there with my blood stains in as well. It turned out building computers left me with as many cuts as working in a professional kitchen, although less burns.
I think mostly they went bust because the home PC market was starting to become saturated, and the largest companies had more economies of scale on their side. But yes, also because the mangers were idiots and treated the staff so badly.
Oh yeah, and because their stock keeping processes were so bad, about 10% of the warehouse stock walked out of the door most days. A box of twenty MP3 players would come in in the morning, and there's be less than ten left by the evening, with only one having been sold. Somehow no one there questioned this 'wastage', presumably they were on the take as well.
Still, there will always be a place in my memory for them, when I remember going into their tiny lock-up in the late eighties to pick up a 512Kb RAM expansion for my Amiga.