Great, now all I need to know is what the gh
version of:
git fetch origin
git checkout master
git reset --hard origin/master
is, and I'll be all set.
6738 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
Microsoft was too late to the mobile party
Oh now look what you've done, you've made Windows CE cry. It's been around since 1996 and you had to say something nasty like that.
No no, it's more important than 'national security'. The security of the telco's profits is at risk!
As everyone knows (and if you don't, you soon will citizen!), profits must come before people. It's written in the constitution, in that special section that you don't get to read because you're not rich enough.
" the Win32 container is new, though apparently it borrows technology from the Windows Subsystem for Linux"
Firstly, to whoever said "the new version of Windows will basically be Linux with a Windows skin", you're not far off.
Secondly, this clearly leaves the door open for WSL to run on Win10X, quite possibly as a container. This way you'll be able to run packaged Linux apps 'natively' on Windows (sort of like backwards Wine), and you all know what that means right?
It's the year of Linux on the desktop!
(not sorry)
"Enigma machines were mechanical and, presumably, later variations on the theme were electromechanical."
Enigma machines were electro-mechanical. Each of the code wheels was full of wires, and each time it turned it changed what was (electricially) connected where, thus scrambling the input.
The Swiss were unlikely to become direct enemies of Germany and the US, so why not chat to some of their top spies, let them in on the idea, and probably sweeten the deal by promising to let them in on anything that might concern them, all they have to do is look the other way...
What's the chances that the finances for the whole operation went through some Swiss banks as well, that way everyone gets their cut.
"you KNOW Bezos would NEVER do this against a president of "the other party""
Mate, they'd sue anyone if they thought it would make them half a wooden nickel. If they could find profit in stealing candy from babies, then Amazon would be straight down the local kindergarten.
As you climb it would get easier, because the higher up the corporate org-chart you go, the less time they'd have for such 'pointless fripperies' like robust passwords.
By the time you reach C-level they'll be running unencrypted wireless because 'their time is too important to waste typing in passwords'. From what I've heard of stock traders they wouldn't want encrypted wireless getting between them and their next bonus payment.
As an example, older APC power distribution units like the AP7921 have a web interface that can only do up to SSL3.0. So my only choice is to either leave them http only, or keep an old copy of IE around to access them. Because yes, I have almost locked myself out of them before by enabling HTTPS. Ours are on a separate management network though, so we can leave them on http only without worrying too much.
(Here's the list of ciphers it supports, read it and weep: DES [56 bit], RC4_MD5 [128 bit], RC4_SHA [128 bit], 3DES [168 bit])
As we all know, catching 100% of bugs is a tall order, even if you throw hours and people at it, but it was this bit that worried me:
Fortunately, the team noticed that second error while reviewing the code following the first, and uploaded the fix prior to landing.
They spotted the error whilst in flight, which presumably means they weren't specifically looking for it, and they certainly didn't have a lot of time to find it, which implies it was a pretty obvious bug.
It wasn't some really subtle bug that 'only happened on flight hardware when the moon is in the third quarter and a subroutine had run within the last hour but not cleared etc. etc.' This was a bug that someone managed to spot while the craft was in space, presumably not while specifically searching for it. This was a bug that should have been picked up by someone before that rocket ever launched, indeed, before that code was ever uploaded to the spacecraft.
That's a management problem, not a software one.
Windows got a lot better at dealing with an unplanned shutdown when they shifted to NTFS as the default file system. FAT doesn't cope with power loss nearly as well, and EXT2 had the exact same problems.
Of course, there's still a slight difference between a hard shutdown (eg, by holding down the power button on a modern machine), and a complete power loss, because at least with a shutdown, there's still power to the harddrives which prevents problems with a head crash.
The default behaviour for a fresh install of Win7 (and Vista/8/10) is that the power button does a shutdown. I've seen pre-installed machines which have it set weirdly, but that's down to the OEM.
In Win 10, the option labelled "Shutdown" is in fact 'hibernate' in order to speed up startup times. This leads to Windows reporting an uptime that is much longer than the time since last power on.
(You can force a 'real' shutdown by holding shift before you click 'Shutdown', or use the command line shutdown /s /f
).
All of those aircraft (indeed, all aircraft) require maintenance after flight, even if it's just a quick checkup.
Numbers on military aircraft are hard to find, but for the B-52 I found a source from 1957 saying that after 25 flight hours (or three flights), it requires a post-flight check, which takes 12-15 man-hours, not including the pre-flight checkup. I suspect BUFFs take a bit more looking after these days now that they're all fifty years old or more.
I've seen numbers of the English Electric Lightning putting it at over 100hrs of maintenance for one hour of flight (for example, the tires had to be replaced after ten landings, often less).
Aircraft have got more complex over the years, because they are more capable*. More complexity means more hours of maintenance.
*(eg, the F-35B can carry about three times the bomb load of a B-17, and drop it about 100 times more accurately).
I heard a story told by Chris Hadfield: See, in micro-gravity, your body has a lot of trouble telling up and down, so after a few days of adjustment, it stops listening to your inner ear, and goes by visual cues instead.
Now, one of the first things that all astro/cosmonauts want when they get home is a proper shower (they probably need it too), so Mr Hadfield got home, went into his shower, started to soap up, and then closed his eyes. The trouble was, his body wasn't using his ears for balance yet, and with his eyes closed it lost track of 'down', and so he fell straight over.
Apparently this isn't particularly uncommon, it's just not one of the stories they tell very often.
I still have RocketMail address, because when they were bought by Yahoo* they promised to honour all of their existing accounts for life.
So, Yahoo can never delete my @rocketmail.com address, and I still occasionally log into it just to annoy them :)
**** edit, I just tried to login, and it's not accepting the 5 digit code that they texted to my phone. Thanks Yahoo!
* (to form the basis of Yahoo Mail, in the same way that Hotmail was bought by Microsoft a month or so before that)
But if they're leaning over your shoulder they can hear how many keys you hit, so they know how long your password is anyway, plus they can probably see which keys you pressed.
On the other hand, for people who aren't as comfortable using computers, not being able to see if they've typed a character or not can be very confusing, which leads to more wrong passwords, which leads to more support calls.
Cue me on the phone having to persuade someone to try typing in a password again even though they're convinced they've already typed it in correctly.
I'm sure the response to this will be "well they should learn to type better", from the exact same people who wonder why Linux isn't more widespread.
On a similar tack, LUKS disables the capslock light, because apparently if someone can see when you've turned capslock on as you type your password, that's too insecure. Yes, there are many people out there who don't understand the shift key, and will type capital letters by pressing \capslock on/ *letter* \capslock off/, and I deal with some of those people on a daily basis. Even just an option to allow the 'insecure capslock light' would save me a few support calls, but no.
Because every single council has had it's funding slashed over the last few years, and this is the 'free market' solution.
Expecting public sector websites not to fund themselves with advertising, what are you, some kind of communist? Now get ready for your children to have to sit through a mandatory five minute 'brand presentation' before each lesson in school (sorry "Google Learning Zone" we have to call them now), whilst the police get their new "Sponsored by Amazon" uniforms.
"just how hard WOULD it be for AWS containers to be made 'secure' by default, so that the devs would really have to balls it up to leave them open."
They are now, but they only introduced that about a year or so ago (iirc).
"TBH, I'd 'settle' for the 2k PCM as it's more than I get now, also if you are at sea, there isn't a lot to spend the pennies on, it would be a great way to save, and see the world."
My brother works at sea, but doing survey work rather than crewing. He still enjoys it (and gets paid well), but I know how much he dislikes not being at home for so much of the year. It's basically as bad as shift work, but you don't even get to go home between shifts. There's certainly IT jobs at sea, although you'll have to be an all rounder. If it's something you're interested in, give it a go!
"We'd all be high net worth individuals if we got paid ~£7K a month"
Yes, but average wages for offshore work are closer to the £2k/mo mark, I dunno where you got £7k from. Maybe a ship's captain would earn that, but then if I was personally responsible for a bloody great ship and the lives of all the people onboard it, I'd want to be paid £84k a year too.
Plus, to qualify for zero tax on your income you have to spend at least half the year offshore, outside of UK waters*. Which generally means twelve hour shifts, living in a very small (probably shared) cabin, with limited internet access and leisure facilities, away from all your friends and family. It's not exactly a sinecure.
* It's a bit more complicated than that really, don't rely on me for tax advice.
Rather than using the name of a band as your password, use the lyrics to one of their songs.
As long as you choose a long enough line, and perhaps swap 'o' for '0' etc. you should be able to come up with a long, difficult to crack, and yet memorable password.
But maybe if you're well know as a One Direction fan, pick someone else's lyrics...
"1) UK shares info with US on the current keys for Galileo.
[...]
3) Galileo is compromised. EU pulls the security keys"
Erm, I'm not sure you understand how cryptographic keys work.
If the ESA revoked the UK's keys, then all that would happen would be that the UK could not use the precise PRS part of the Galileo system. All the other EU countries will have their own indevidual keys, so they'll be fine, and the public Galileo signals will still work (which when combined with the public GPS and GLONASS signals will still be plenty precise).