Re: I only see 2 options: (though this is only a quick look)
3) Just reboot them anyway.
6732 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Feb 2010
You know how every bit of Microsoft documentation about setting up AD has always said to use a specific domain which is not your web address?
Well whoever set up the AD at my last job never read it. Nope, they'd set it up as companyname.co.uk, which was already causing problems when I started there, let alone during my job :(
How many times per day do you run backups on your systems?
At my last job I was creating a new snapshot every hour during business hours on the file server, keeping (I think) the last 12 hourly snapshots. (And then daily/weekly/monthly rotations, backing up to tape etc.). That was for normal user files (spreadsheets and the like) and worked well, and give me very quick restores for the "oops I just overwrote a file I need in five minutes" type requests.
Why does Firefox need to rethink it's UI, when it's already basically the same as Chrome?
Both have tabs along the top, under that you have Back, Forward, and Reload, then an address bar (that's also a search bar). Then the icons for whatever addons you have installed.
There some differences when you go into the menus, but that's 99% of most people's interactions with their browser.
The number of refuels required depends on the efficiency of the Raptor engines, not how much thrust they produce. I'm sure the efficiency has been increasing, but probably not linearly in-line with the thrust produced. And it doesn't just depend on the engines. If the design of Starship has to change to add (eg) one kilo of extra self-destruct equipment, that's a kilo of fuel they won't be able to carry (on every single trip). Currently the design of Starship is very much in flux, let alone the currently non-existent lunar variant.
It's just too early to say how many refuelling trips will be necessary right now.
el Reg have been following the story for over a decade now, which is how I first heard about it.
I suspect they meant it unthinkingly as 'those damn kids', but now that most millennials are in their late 30's/early 40's, chances are that it's managers around that age who are in charge of pushing new 'features' at Microsoft, so it might not be that far off.
I think if he'd donated as much to republicans, and they were in power, he probably wouldn't have been prosecuted for any of the charges.
Although I suppose once they realised he was broke and they weren't going to get any more donations off of him, they might have gone ahead. Not with the campaign 'contributions' charge of course, that might make people look at who he made 'contributions' to.
(Most US 'lobbying' would be considered straight up bribery under UK laws. To me the whole system seems rife with corruption on all sides)
I feel like OP missed out the word lit cigarette butts, which would make a better analogy.
And while it is possible to reuse the batteries, that's not much practical use if the majority of them are thrown in with general rubbish (or just chucked on the street). At least specific 'electronics' collections might hopefully make it easier to find reusable components without digging through a mound of mixed rubbish, and also reduce the fire risk somewhat.
If the the magnets quench and the vents are blocked and something ruptures the room is going to be full of He gas. Apart from the Donald Duck screams you might also be a little short of oxygen.
Well yes, but a bigger problem is that the room now contains all the air it contained before, plus probably several rooms worth of additional helium and nitrogen, which tends to make the room go bang. Think something like the blast effect of a (fuel) gas explosion, but without the heat.
Hopefully this will just blow the windows out (and possibly the roof), but anyone in the room is going to have very painful ears at least.
Especially because he should've checked the test system and would've seen nothing was being purged.
From TFA; the purge job was copied from the test environment. So presumably it was working as intended in test.
I, of course, have never copied anything from my test environment into prod. Erm, except for that one time when I ended up changing a name to "test" across everything. Oops, at least it was a quick fix.
At some point, probably next year (they're aiming for 'early 2024' ), there's a privately funded Dragon mission which aims to reach a 700km orbit, and perform an EVA. After that I guess we'll be able to see how suitable it is.
It's a real photograph of a hill covered in grass, which had grown since vineyards had been removed. It's that shade of green because of the weather at the time, and possibly because of the film used, but it's not been touched up or photoshopped.
Better than HP. In their gen8 (or maybe 9) servers, the disk caddies had a large red light on them, which if you looked closely had a big exclamation mark on it. This light indicates "Do Not Remove", however, if you don't know this, and are sent to swap the failed disk in a server with a mirror of two drives, you might well assume that the big red light is on the failed drive.
I think in the end I only caused about half an hour of downtime, but I still blame HP.
Apparently Weyland doesn't support screensavers.
(elReg writers should ask JWZ for quotes more often; he's got the CV, worked at Mozilla, main dev for XScreenSaver etc. and he always has an opinion that would spice up an otherwise boring article)
could this be used, for example, a Chromebook with the same chips, or say Mac if it used the same readers
The issue here is that while Windows does require that devices should follow their SDCP specification, apparently there's no checks that a manufacturer actually is following the spec. (The Microsoft Surface using absolutely no encryption at all must have been particularly embarrassing for the Windows Hello team who sponsored the research). With the information from this research, Microsoft could crackdown on shoddy manufacturer's implementations, but if they're strict then that would result in fingerprint recognition being disabled for many people, just because the manufacturer couldn't/didn't fix their flaws.
I don't know enough about Chromebooks to say about them, but I'm pretty sure that as Apple control all of the hardware and software they use, they should be more secure. You'd hope so at least.
Often it's not so much the fingerprint reader, but your actual fingerprint. I find that my fingerprints fail to scan (across multiple devices) more often when my fingers are very cold and dry.
If I breathe on them to make them slightly more warm and damp, they scan fine.
I suspect the solution is to add one or two fingerprints whilst your hands are cold and dry, and then perhaps add some from the other hand when your hand is hot and sweaty.
Ternary logic is the most efficient base because 3 is the closest integer to e. Oh, and clearly the boss didn't know that various people have created ternary computers.