Re: You mean the Martini Clock!
Here here! It was always that to our family on our occasional jaunts up the M4 to London when I were a lad.
318 publicly visible posts • joined 19 Feb 2010
Oddly when I have chatted on line to their support staff about my T+Cs they have not tried to keep me as a customer but have been open and honest* about whether I am in contract with them and when my service runs to each month. So top marks for them for that.
Still don't have much confidence with their tech support and can get better (hopefully) and cheaper.
It'll be quite fun telling them why I am leaving, "...well four reasons, have you got a pen?...."
*Of course time will tell whether they are honest - I have kept copies of the chats I had if I need them later on.
The thing is with real shops like Maplin is that you can get the item in your hand and see if it seems OK, so I will stuff form them I need now (like others have said), but also stuff I can have a damn good look a t from all angles, checking stuff you cannot see in an online catalogue.
But I do wonder how long they might last as well.
@Jason, interesting point(s) - I wonder if you are right (seriously)
I grew up wanting to be an electronic engineer designing things like radios and 'hifi', and although I scraped a degree in electronics, I was never that good at component level - I've met many technicians who are much better than me at fixing things but don't have the academic qualifications. I still have a box load of components languishing in the the workshop - mostly old 7400 series chips and Z80s. Every now and again I think of putting them on ebay or giving them away but then think I should keep them for some obscure reason e.g. I might need them one day...
There are 6 of us in my role using a couple of desks 24x7 and we like things in slightly different positions (oo-er!) - I'd love to be abel to easily adjust the desk and monitor heighta for periods of standing and sitting. Sadly I think I am the only one who likes the idea of standing up once in a while.
Thanks for that - our family had an Australian Moke for years - it became my first car and I used it for years. It was the most fun car to drive and even though not that fast, it felt fast as it was close to the road and open and you could see each corner and squeeze through small gaps. It was my only car for many years.
I sold it eventually as I now like sedate comfortable travel (got married!)
Anyway - back to the Land Rover.....
"The company previously announced plans to slow production from 1.3 planes a month to just one a month, with the new and lower capability expected to kick in from March 2016."
I think I can see where Boeing have been going wrong, making one whole plane and then 0.3 of a plane I suspect is very wasteful and I doubt they get many orders for the 0.3, but I've been wrong before....
[sorry]
I am finding all UI seems to be getting worse on all sorts of devices. I am happy to find my way around stuff and explore, but often older non-technical people are finding TVs, PVRs and similar so difficult to use.
Trouble is that UIs tend to copy each other as that is what we have got used to, and we are unlikely to change now. It's a bit like cars, clutch, brake and accelerator - complex to use and you have to take your foot of the accelerator to apply the brakes - in that time the car can travel several human widths. Anyway - point I am making is that people get stuck in their ways and good new functional design can be difficult to implement due to inertia to learning new stuff even when it is better.
'Virgin got out of the DSL business and sold it to TalkTalk.' - and that's how some of us ended up being TT customers - I'd leave if I could take my wife's virgin.net email with me/us (I've tried to get a domain name for her but her resistance to change is very high - other suggestions welcome - divorce too extreme)
Still, TT do save me 24p a month compared to Virgin!
When this issue is mentioned I find it odd that no-one thinks that maybe electric cars will run on standardised rechargeable batteries which get swapped at charging stations - probably replacing the petrol station network over time.
So you drive up, the charge in your batteries is measured, a machine removes them, puts in new ones and you pay for the amount of top up charge that you have just been given - less what you had removed. Could be done in less time it takes to fill a petrol car. Obviously this would not work with current EVs as the manufacturers are still experimenting with vehicle design, but if the battery mounting/compartment(s) was standardised on every new EV, this should be straightforward. Lots of problems, but nothing the reg readers could not imagine overcoming (this is what proper engineers do)
The charging station itself would be automated and slowly charging all the depleted batteries (or maybe collecting them for sending off to much larger automated charging stations. In either case grid power consumption could be dynamically controlled to help control demand to the generators and grid (maybe by dynamic pricing! Ughhhh...) Maybe you could have up to 100 batteries on charge at a time, but if demand needs to be reduced that would get signalled and it can be reduced to 50, 20, 10, none etc.
With a standardised battery, manufacturers could 'sell' their vehicle as having 1, 2, 3 or more slots. 1 battery for small economy EVs. 2 batteries for general use (small hatchbacks). 5 batteries for show offs (high performance willy extensions)
Also as battery technology improves (I am an optimist) new better/higher capacity would filter down, older 'worn out' batteries could be serviced/recycled by large efficient factories.
Thanks itman for that - I hate to say it - I am sure I'll be in a minority - but I found your comment was much easier to read and follow than anything Tim has written here. I'm not sure I fully agree but I'm getting so philosophical these days I cannot make my mind up.
Having said that I have enjoyed reading TIm's articles here over the year and challenging my preconceptions and wish him well.
When I fly, I enjoy the flight but hate the airport parts*, so for me a direct flight would be worth it - but then I count flying as a luxury that I only do every few years, so I like to make it as stress free as possible.
* getting to/from the airport, worrying about mislaying my tickets/passport/luggage, checking in, security (do they have to be so unpleasant? I am always polite and helpful), going through the airport, having to wait at the gate for so long etc etc.
I wonder if this will allow apps to be run in-situ as it were - no more loading them into RAM, just a add a pointer in the active running list.. RAM would be the computer's scratch pad for stuff it is working on.
This could really have a dramatic effect on what we think of as the typical architecture of a PC* - or maybe we are too set in our ways - interesting times ahead if it takes off.
*I mean, CPU+RAM+STORAGE+I/O
Forget the computer security issues here - when I drive a car, I control it. I don't mind the computer knowing what I'm doing with the car but the controls systems for the brakes, engine and steering should NOT be controllable from it. The engine, ABS and stability controls systems should be separate. This is completely possible - if I monitor the output of something it does not mean I can control it.
Poor cheap design I say.
I'm 49 (thanks for asking) and have never been able to sleep on planes, in fact I'm not very good at sleeping in a chair and they don't allow you to lie down in the aisle for some reason.
My FIL 'learnt' how to grab naps anywhere while he did his national service in the RAF - I've never been much of a napper - drives my wife mad - but then she is a light sleeper at night.
Never been able to and yet I sleep quite well in a bed.
I once even had a nice 9 hour flight set for after a night shift, LGW to Vancouver. 'Great' I thought 'I'll finally get to sleep on a plane'. No....I stayed awake for too many hours and was a zombie for most of the week I was there.
I have since vowed that anything over 3 hours we go business or at least upper class or similar - so we hardly ever fly....
I guess your business is not 24 hour....
We usually find changes on a Thursday prior to a bank holiday weekend only start to show as problematic at 5pm on Friday, when all the people who know the details and how to roll them back are generally escaping and uncontactable.
We are getting new procedures soon....
I don't live nearby and don't have the time but would love to help out if I could. I have joked for several years about buying replacement gates/pixels/ccd cells etc for stuff at work [TV engineering] (no one laughs for some reason...........I know, I know)
I wonder if you can step-by-step the clock for debugging?
Well I feel a bit of a dunce now - but better informed (so thanks in a way), I had a look in Keychain (never opened it before) and saw that there are some passwords there. I did not realise that for some systems (typically Apple stuff) it stored them there whether you liked it or not. When the pop-up had appeared in the past 'Do you want Keychain to store this password' - I had always said no.
I guess my browsers store some passwords - I do occasionally reset them clearing certain logons but I type in passwords for things like online stores and banking when I need them - don't know how risky it is being logged into the register often - I tend to have different passwords for everything.
Being a miserable git (or whatever term takes your fancy) I've not really got into the social media stuff
I have never used Keychain - I've never felt it was safe 'leaving' my passwords 'in the computer' even if they are encrypted and supposedly locked down somehow. Having said that, like most people my email password is stored within my mail client and I don't want to have to type it in every time I want to check for email.
OSes eh? Is it going to be linux next time for me or give up the computer time wasting.
I do the same - saves others having to insult or offend me.
I think you came across really well in case you need to be told.
What I find difficult to imagine is what technology will be like in the 15-20 years, bearing in mind I have been playing with it since the late seventies. Do we need computers/cellphones/TVs that are any faster or smaller? Maybe I am lacking the imagination I once had.
I know you assume all your readers to know those things, but might t be worth mentioning i the article the approximate location of the talk (or any of these talks)
Having to click through to book* just to find the location is as annoying as websites that don't tell you delivery costs until you register and almost place an order. (*even then to only says 'London' which somewhat vague)
A line like - "as usual the venue will be [whereever it is]" would suffice