* Posts by ph0b0s

276 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Feb 2010

Page:

Ofcom says no to web-blocking

ph0b0s

More meant ....

that I found it funny an article saying web blocking due to copyright was dead, a few days after a judge orders BT to block a website due to copyright. So clear as mud then.

ph0b0s

"Web-blocking dead for now"

Unless a judge says it's all right. So not quite that dead then.....

PCTV NanoStick T2 USB TV tuner

ph0b0s

Becuase of the TV Center Software

The TV Center software cannot work out what are the right channel numbers to assign to which channels. It assigns them in the order the channels are scanned. And you cannot set them properly manually either. The company know this and blew me off when I reported it as a problem. Windows Media Center, and the free NPVR can correctly do this though, just not the bundled software.

ph0b0s

Have recorded from at least 2 HD channels at the same time without issues

Obviously they are on the same multiplex. For recording off channels of two different multiplexes of course you would need a dual tuner. But since there is only 1 HD multiplex at the moment a dual dvb-t2 tunner would be overkill when you can just buy a normal dvb-t usb stick for peanuts.

ph0b0s

EPG Only on Windows 7 Media Center

Only devices that have signed up to the Freeview HD certification are allowed to get the key to the encrypted Freeview HD EPG. The only software that does this is the Win 7 version of media center. But that is a good thing as to get certification to the get the EPG the device / software has to embed DRM in your recordings. I don't want this so am happy not to have it. As a work around you just use other programs to get xml listing from the internet.

ph0b0s

Challenge the review idea....

.... that since it is usb it is only meant for mobile devices. This is false. I brought mine to use in my HTPC. Why you ask? Well PCI TV cards can be temperamental, that is if you have any PCI slots nowadays. Where as in my experience USB stick don't have so many hardware issues / conflicts and you always are likely to have a free USB slot.....

Murdoch muscles BBC out of Formula One driving seat

ph0b0s

Sky SOP

This is sky standard operating procedure of finding something that has a big fan base on Free to air and then moving it behind a paywall. It is how they make their money.

They did this with 24 and Lost. They wait for a while for the content to become popular then swoop in and bid mega money to grab the fan base (hopefully).

ph0b0s

F1 goes subscription

Great, this is the first time F1 has not be freely available to standard licence fee payers. This maybe a great day for the Beeb and Sky but for consumers it is a dark day indeed. I hope the F1 viewing figures drop by as much as they deserve to....

Another reason I paid the licence fee just disappeared. If I was not such a rolling news junkie it would be toast.

BT on site-blocking: Every case will need a court order

ph0b0s

"Pick on our freetards over our cold dead corpse"

Really? That's what you are going with. An ISP wants a judge to look at block requests rather than just taking the media companies word that the site should be blocked. Yep, they are freetard loving a$$holes alright....

Really try and editorialise a bit better, as if it was sarcastic it did not come across.

Dongling P2P downloaders 2nd-biggest mobe data users

ph0b0s

Differentiated service vs net neutrality

Two thing's:

First is how this change will fit in with net neutrally rules etc, as they don't seem to fit very well to me.

Second is that ISP's want to be just treated like utility providers who cannot police the internet for governments and rights holders. They want to be like Electricity and Water providers where they provide the utility, but don't police what you do with what they provide.

That argument gets more difficult when they are in effect policing your traffic themselves so they can have differentiated services for their own profit.

'There's too much climate change denial on the BBC'

ph0b0s

Two corrections, must proof read better, (really need an edit function here)

"Coming from a Scientific background, the way this works seems simple. YOU create a hypothesis. You then use that hypothesis to work out how things should behave (like in a computer model)."

"Again please correct me where my statements are incorrect, but I though this was a pretty simple concept in science that hypothesis has to match reality. And to debate this should NOT result in you being called a denier. People challenging E=MC^2 is perfectly fine in science."

ph0b0s

Computer models....

""There have been many computer models of what may happen in future," Jones says, adding, "almost every climatologist predicts a period of rising temperature"."

This is my biggest problem with this. How many of these computer models have actually tallied well with what is actually happening?

Coming from a Scientific background, the way this works seems simple. How create a hypothesis. You then use that hypothesis to work out how things should behave (like in a computer model). You test experimentally that what was predicted due to your hypothesis tally's with what you see experimentally. I.e you should see happening in the real word what was predicted in the computer models. You test to make sure there are no other variables you have not taken into account that also affect things, but that's it.

So climate change proof should be easy, you should be able to roll out the results predicted by the computer models and they should match with what we have actually been seeing over the past few years. But as far as I'm aware the models are not matching up apart from in the basic prediction that temperatures will go up. I would expect at least the rate of increase to match up, which seems to be not happening at the moment.

Now I know modelling the whole world's climate is not easy. But one prediction was that the rate of increase in temperature was supposed to be increasing, which has not matched reality.

Now I sit on no side in this. You put a model in front of me that is being accurate in it predictions, I am with you. But that does not seem to be the case yet.... And yes I am completely there with the idea the climate is changing, just the why is not 100% for me yet.

Again please correct me where my statements are incorrect, but I though this was a pretty simple concept in science that hypothesis has to match reality. And to debate this should result in you being called a denier. People challenging E=MC^2 is perfectly fine in science. There is only one field I can think of where you are not allowed to challenge dogma......

Japanese erections named 'Bollox', 'Wonder Device'

ph0b0s

Don't use English, please.....

I feel bad for the Japanese, they love to use bits of English for things to make them sound cool, from a few words in J-pop to use in anime. The problem is they always make a complete hash of it. I appreciate the complement, but if you are going to do it at least do it well or you just get treated as a laughing stock, as in this case.

But then again probably no-one there cares, as it is all meant for internal consumption where they would not know what something means but since it is English it must be cool. Like Del boy and his use of French terms....

AMD says Xbox 720 graphics to be good as Avatar

ph0b0s

Bechies

You have the specs right, it stuck in my head as having the same spec as two 570's, due it performing like two 570's if not worse. Checkout the benchmarks at a site like this: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4239/nvidias-geforce-gtx-590-duking-it-out-for-the-single-card-king/10

The 590 has been so under-clocked due to the heat caused by the two GPU's on the one card that it cannot compete with two single cards.

Cards like the 590 are really for people who don't have enough room for two cards so need both the GPU's on the one card. The only advantage the 590's have is you can do quad SLI vs 580's tri SLI. But then with the performance difference, I don't know what out of quad 590 vs tri 580 would be fastest.

ph0b0s

What PC's capable of today you mean....

"Xbox 720 graphics to be amazing and will match what PC's are capable of today."

What cracks me up with these comments is not the outlandishness of saying you will get real time Avatar like graphics, which is laughable. But then again I do seem to recall there being a story of Nvidia demonstrating real time ray tracing using a couple of Fermi based GPU's no too long ago, so maybe not as laughable as it first seems....

The thing that makes me laugh the most is you don't need to wait for next gen consoles to arrive to see this stuff as next gen consoles will be using hardware you can find in PC's today. You really think AMD are going to invent a new revolutionary GPU just for the 720. No, they will use architecture that already exists in their PC products, as they did with previous console gens. In fact the GPU they put in will not even be cutting edge as price and heat will be a concern. The way this could be different is if console pricing is set to increase drastically.

I am not saying that currently PC games reflect this, as we all know no-one uses all the power that PC's have as they just concentrate on what consoles can do. The same holds true with AI and physics which will be CPU based and suffer that same restrictions.

The basics of console hardware design are as follows. Look at what is available on the PC market and then work out, out of what is available, what will fit your heat and cost requirements.

What will be great is that with consoles hopefully be moving to DX11 hardware, so more devs will start to develop for the features there. More powerful CPU features like better AI will be good also. But by the point these new consoles launch the PC will probably be on DX12. So PC owners we be peeved no-one is using DX12 feature due to consoles not having it, and the cycle will start again.

ph0b0s

Halfway there

Well, with tessellation these flat textures are now becoming 3D objects. But since everything you see, even 3d objects and characters, have textures over them.

ph0b0s

2 x 580 = a 590, Erm no

You need to look at the specs better. The 590 is basically two 570 gpu's put on one board, with some extra memory. A 590 is nowhere near as fast as two 580's. It even sometimes stuggles to be as fast as two 570's.

Sunspot decline could mean decades of cold UK winters

ph0b0s

Chinese coal blamed for global warming er... cooling

Love that these two stories are posted so close together.

HP plan for faster, 64GB TouchPad leaks out

ph0b0s

Nvidia Kal-el upgrade

This will be when Nvidia's Kal-el or Tegra 3 (to give it's estimated production name), becomes available. People should know that any Tegra 2 tablet they buy now will be out if date in a few months due to quad core Kal-el launching, come on Register, it's not a secret.

Tegra 2 has been out for quite a while now. Blame the manufacturers who took so long to use it that it is almost out of date right out of the gate.....

Virgin Media blames Activision for Call of Duty lag problems

ph0b0s

-1 for the PC elitest

As another PC gamer, stop giving us a bad name with your obnoxious attitude.

ph0b0s

Basic diagnostic logic.....

"However, Reg reader Paul claimed that he hadn't experienced the same problem with any other UK ISPs when playing the online game."

This says it all. I think lots of people would be jumping up and down if this was a problem with the game. If it is just happening with one ISP, it then looks fairly obvious who has the problem. This bit of basic logic has been missed by the article writer as well.

"Earlier this year a gamers' lobby group reported Activision to the UK's Office of Fair Trading.

Gamers' Voice, which was founded by Labour MP Tom Watson in 2009, claimed in January that the Call of Duty: Black Ops game failed to function as advertised. Gripes included sudden disconnections from multi-player sessions online."

Also other ISP's trottle P2P, etc so Virgin must be doing something else unique. Since Virgin are trying to deny even basic diagnostic logic, customers may well have to vote with their feet.

UK's worst gaming ISP indeed.....

UK man charged with attack that shut down SOCA site

ph0b0s

Mastermind or not?

The police reports when he was first arrested was that he was the Lulzsec mastermind. In which case the arrest is a result. But see nothing to indicate this in the charges. Is it instead that they got some low hanging fruit instead? Suppose we will see by whether the amount of lulzsec attacks goes down....

Wii U has 50 per cent more power than rivals

ph0b0s

Setting you both striaght

First @chad, you are completely right "Power is not everything." Please tell this to Nintendo and the press who have been harping on about the power of the Wii U, like in the article above. Nintendo have stated one of their aims with this console is to win back hard core gamers and attract triple AAA titles to the system, that were lacking with the Wii. Why they would be chasing this market when the Wii was so successful is for others to discuss. The point of my post is, if that their aim is as stated, then they have already shoot themselves in the foot. For the reasons I stated above.

@Lee Dowling. A couple of things. You are quite right that most consoles do not run DirectX code. But since all current gen console graphics cards are PC derived GPU's designed to run DirectX it is a useful standard to use when discussing graphical performance of different consoles.

Second DX 11 is being ignored at the moment because all consoles at the moment are at most DX 9, not as you said because it cuts out some of the PC market. No-one wants to invest in using a level of DX that cannot be easily moved to consoles, due to the larger market. Hence most games are DX 9 at the moment. Even DX 10 is still not the norm.

Also a title coded for DX11 is automatically DX10 due to DX11's backward comparability. The only things you would loss out on are DX11 features like hardware tessellation. The only people left out in the cold of a DX11 only title, would be people who only have DX9 hardware, a minority these days in the PC gaming market. So there is no excuse for not coding for DX11 apart from fearing that your engine won't run on consoles.

And as far as DX11 not adding anything graphically, I beg to differ, hardware tessellation makes quite a big difference to the graphics you can turnout. And I expect to hear the term tessellation used repeatedly by Microsoft and Sony when they come to release their next consoles (unless over shadowed by some feature DX 12 brings to the party)

ph0b0s

50% more power, so what....

What people seem to be missing is that this will launch in a year with DirectX 10.1 capable hardware, just as Win 8 launches with an inevitable new DX version. So instantly the Wii will be two gens behind.

I grant you that, initially the Wii U will have a big advantage over the current gen consoles from Microsft and Sony. But that will only be for about a year before they release their next gen consoles with DX 11 or later version hardware. Then the new Wii will have same problem as it's predecessor of being behind with low amounts AAA title support, again....

Brit censor stamps on The Human Centipede

ph0b0s

Again, Extreme Pr0n?

If the BBFC have not certified it, I don't know whether being in possession of this movie would be classed as extreme pr0n. I know I am sounding paranoid, but it would not surprise me if someone found with this in their possession has some problems.

The same way that anyone who pirated that movie, that got pulled from blockbuster shelves by the police, a while ago. If you did not download the right BBFC certified cut you would would also be in trouble....

Sometimes downloading movies can have more risks than just angering the movie industry...

ph0b0s

Extreme Pr0n?

If the BBFC have not certified it, I don't know if it might be classed as extreme pr0n. So I would be very cautious about ordering anything like this which will go through customs.....

Cameron calls for ISP-level parental censorship tools

ph0b0s

Biggest facepalm ever...

"To provide that option, Bailey is calling on the internet industry to offer either a network-level filtering system, such as the one TalkTalk just introduced, or else via "pre-installed software on a new laptop"."

"pre-installed software on a new laptop", yeah it's called Windows 7 and with it's browser, it has all the easy to setup child controls you will ever need.

Done can we all go home now. Really can someone just point out the this guy that what he wants is already there....

ISP level filtering is not the way to go, thats why these things have been put in OS's and browsers, where they actually work. It's like trying to do something with the tyres on your car in to make it go faster without doing anything with the engine and then not understanding why expensive tyres only give you a little bit of a performance increase.

The only reason that a government would want this in place is so they have a filtering infrastructure in place for their own agenda, under the cover of child protection....

Billionaire Zuckerberg kills to eat

ph0b0s

@ArmanX, A quibble about something thatr was never said....

Never said people should have to kill 'everything' they eat, but most people have not killed 'anything' they have eaten, that's what I think is very wrong. Zuckerberg's approach is an extreme one, that I would not recommend, but his hearts in the right place.

And it is a completely false equivalency to liken it to not being able to use the internet until you have built a packet or any of the other hyperbolic things you tried to equated it too. There is no one who would not be able to stomach creating a packet or directing a movie in given the opportunity, time and tools to do so, unlike silting the throat of a cute doe eyed critter.

ph0b0s

I still think...

that you should not be a be able to eat meat if you do not have the stomach to deal with where it comes from.

So should you have to kill everything you eat a la Zukkerburg, no that would be unworkable today. But I do think that people who want to eat meat should at least have to kill an animal every so often. Bit like taking a driving test. Every couple of years go to an abattoir (so the thing you kill would not have to suffer more than normal, by your lack of experience) and do your 'meat certification'.

I also think PETA and other animal rights groups should be behind this idea, as I think that there are a lot of people out there eating meat who would not have the stomach to kill anything, so the ranks of veggies would increase as a by product, though we would have a new phenomenon of the 'grudging veggies'.

It all comes down to can you look the nice fluffy lamb in that face and takes it's life, if you can I have no problems with you, enjoy your lamb and mint source. If you can't, like me, I have a big problem with as a person who cannot look the animal in the face, but are quite happy to eat it's flesh afterwards, that's cowardly in the extreme.

ph0b0s

Good on him, from a non meat eater

As a person who no longer eats meat, I wish more people would behave like him. Yeah, bet you did not expect that.

I believe everyone should have to kill a least a bit of what meat they eat. That's why I stopped eating meat, as I thought it was hypercritical, since I would not be able to kill any of the meat I was eating. I think people would have to kill an animal every so often (once a year maybe) to earn the right to eat those animals.

Those nice packets of meat in the supermarket came from somewhere and if you cannot stomach being confronted with where it came from, might I direct you to the meat substitute section in the supermarket.

This page has been left intentionally blank

ph0b0s

Can't belive I am saying this, but....

"As for This Morning, if we toned everything down in case children are watching, we may as well just switch off the TV transmitters right now."

... there is such a thing as a watershed though, were parents should have some confidence in stuff being child safe before then, certainly at that time of the morning....

But then again since the show was probably followed by Jeremy Kyle with a load of chav's swearing about their infidelity and sexual antics, I think that ship has already sallied...

Apple tops Microsoft market cap, revenue, and profits

ph0b0s

Microsoft is a software company...

Ignoring all those consoles out there, that is. Those consoles that have cut into their profits due to the amount of hardware failures. I bet they wish they were a just a software company at the moment.....

But if they are such different companies, doing different things, why are we comparing their profits at all?

Cops raid man whose Wi-Fi was used to download child porn

ph0b0s

Counter productive

This approach is more than likely to let the real perpetrator get away. If it is an open hot spot being used by neighbours, for no good, what do you think their first reaction will be to seeing their neighbours being raided. That's right destroy the evidence....

If they actually did a bit of investigation first to check if the wireless is open, and who actually uses it, they could be more targeted in their approach.

But as long as the law have caught someone, even if not the real abusers, they seem to be happy.... That's my main problem with a lot of these CP stories.

'Real' JavaScript benchmark topped by...Microsoft

ph0b0s

So Firefox best....

I love misleading article titles and editorials. The article was really saying that with this 'suspect' benchmark Firefox was fasted out of all the currently released browsers.....

Don't think it is fair to compare IE10 as it is only a preview rather than a fully functioning browser with all Microsoft's traditional bloat

Virgin Media says sorry over Superhub snafu

ph0b0s

Completely different point.

I agree that is also one of Virgin's problems, but not one I have come across. My comments were about the "core" and "distribution" areas of the network where "access" area technologies come together and it's difficulty in dealing with what is hitting it.

ph0b0s

Well...

Of course I know that faster speeds will filter down to lower tier users at some point, but what does that have to do with anything. For Virgin 10Mb is low speed, as it is the lowest you can select from them.

Contention has a lot to do with end user line speeds. As it stands one 50 Mb connection added to the network can generate the same amount of traffic as 5, 10 Mb connections added. If a lot of people chose 50Mb and are actually using it, that is a huge load added to an already struggling network. And yes I know that network load is statistical and that I am simplifying things.

Essentially my comment could have been more succinct expressed if I had said. "What Virgin's network is this bad even though 50 Mb connections are not working properly. How bad will it be when the connections are working properly...."

Again this is not to bash 50 Mb users, you should be able to fully use the line you have paid for. The problem I have is with Virgin trying to make out that they are the best because they have the fastest line speeds to peoples houses, even though the core of their network cannot deal with the loads generated by those line speeds.

ph0b0s

Unpopular post

While I feel for my fellow Virgin customers who have been screwed by their new fast connections, I am actually hoping that you guys do not get your issues fixed.

Wait, before you start flaming, there is method in my unsympathetic maddness. For those of use with low speed lines (10 Mb) etc, who have seen virgin's network slow to a crawl due to virgin adding more faster connections and not upgrading the network core to deal with it, it does not bode well that giving people full fixed access to their high speed lines will improve the situation.

So I know this sounds unsympathetic, but having this issue may have stopped virgins network grinding to a complete holt over that last few months. Will see what the effect is of having trouble free high speed users on the network. And this is not a dig against high line speed users, you paid for it, so you should get the service. But a dig against Virgin who want the kudos of having the highest ISP end user line speeds, without having a network that can service the line speeds that they are selling.

I see more throttling on the way....

Indonesian anti-smut MP caught ogling filth

ph0b0s

How come...

every time a politician takes a moral stand against something, they are always found to be engaged in what they are taking a stand against. Happens every time, like Nick Clegg against nepotism last week.

Crysis 2

ph0b0s

You probably will be fine.

As a side effect of the game being a console port with only Directx 9 it is less intensive than the first game. So even if the first game was a problem the second may not. But I am sure you know how to search the internet for the official min and recommended requirements of a game....

ph0b0s

Console port not interested....

Crytek now make console ports for the PC, so I'm not interested. But good for you console owners who get the a great game in comparison to what you are used to....

BBC explains hour-long website outage

ph0b0s

Not just the website

Funnily enough all the BBC TV channels went down at the same time.... But that was to do with digital switch-over in my area. So no apocalypse then...

Three to drop mobile smut shield

ph0b0s
Thumb Down

This is the problem

This is my main problem with this system. It is not ready for prime time. The filters should be able to be turned on or off at mobiles users pleasure. Until then this is possible, it is more of a hindrance than a help.

I does not have to be instant, but within a few days, as phones can be hand me downs within families etc.

TV sitcom opens up the world of penetration testing

ph0b0s

Exactly what I thought

when I heard the premise. That was such a good movie. But no-one ever seems to have heard of it. Why is it when people talk about good hacking movies people think of Swordfish. ARRRGHHH!

Sony wins subpoena for PS3 hacker's PayPal records

ph0b0s

@AC

'go get a life!', what are you, 12?

Console owners make money by locking you in to their platforms, hence why you cannot play Xbox games on PS3's and visa versa Or why Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo have not agreed on a console gaming standard so you would have interoperability of games over all consoles, even though they use the same API's in the games. Manufacturers would love to have the same situation with movies and music, but the consumer market have not been stupid enough to let them. These companies make less money by having standards like DVD, etc.

I am not getting into this 'software is licenced so any modification is illegal' argument again. The US library of congress already ruled that you are allowed to jailbreak / root mobiles, so the same is true with consoles. They stipulated that it was only criminal if the only purpose of the hack was for piracy. I have seen no evidence that the hacking SONY are unhappy about was for the sole purpose of piracy. In all the demonstrations of the hack it was to run home-brew software and return features removed by SONY.

Some will argue that the library of congress did not specifically name consoles, or that the situation with this hack is different to the situation with jailbreaking / rooting phones. But I don't agree. It is exactly the same situation and should have the same exceptions. This is backed up by the fact that before hacking PS3's Geohotz was jailbreaking Iphones using the same technique as they both run Linux.

And just because the guy comes over as dick makes no difference to the case.

Next up with this rubbish is Nintendo with their 3DS. Which has tech in to disable the device if you do anything Nintendo don't like. So annoy Nintendo and you get a paper weight. That is not a future I want or others here want.

I 100% support giving game pirates the worst time possible, but not at the price of allowing these big corporations to rid rough shot over how people can use their devices. It is not hackers fault that the same system that stops piracy as stops the running of legal, but no manufacture sanctioned software or applications. If you could run legal non sanctioned software / actives without breaking the piracy protections, then I would fully support SONY chasing people who break the piracy protection system, as the hackers objectives would be 100% obvious.

And all the above is why people you disagree with, do have 'a brain' and care about the situation, even if you and your PS3 owning bud's are not really bothered'. And if I owned 3 PS3's, would that make my point any more valid than yours?

ph0b0s

No, it's more like buy to rent

They want you to purchase full price, so the consumer has to take all the disadvantages of ownership, like bearing the brunt of hardware depreciation, disposal, etc. But at the same time take away the advantages you would normally expect to come with ownership.

They would never want to go with a rent model as then they have to have the depreciating hardware on their books. Much better to have the consumer bear these costs but still only have the same rights as if they had rented.

ph0b0s

The future

For those who only think this is a battle against piracy, you need to wake up. This is a battle about consumer rights. This is a battle about what you can do with products you have purchased. Tech companies are trying to make it that hardware you buy is licensed by you rather than owned.

A win here will mean we are closer to being locked down on anything we purchase. Only being able to play Blu-ray's and DVD's from the same company we brought the players from. Only being able to use bread in toasters supplied by the toaster maker.

I know I am being a bit hyperbolic in my doomy scenarios. But if there is a win here one thing I do think we will see is that consumer devices like TV's etc that have internet connections will require you log into an on-line account. Once locked to that account you will not be able to sell the device on as it will be locked to your account. So no more second hand market.

I expect to see this happening with consoles very soon if, Sony wins here.

Also how legally bad is this that Sony are allowed by a US court to look a records that may implicate people from other countries.

Message from South Oz: YouTube not for assaults

ph0b0s

Sweep it under the carpet.

Yep, this is a great idea. If the crime is not filmed, it did not happen. Problem solved.

So in the future in a case like the school kid fight, the two involved in the fight get suspended. The person filming it gets arrested. That sounds fair.

I agree that trying to discourage copy catting is a worth while aim, but the ban hammer? Is that really the best you can come up with?

To me the only time you should be able to go down that road, is if you can prove that the person who caused the assault also caused the filming. I.e like the assault versions of a snuff vids (which I am not sure ever existed). In which case you just go after the assaulter even more than you normally would.

But an completely innocent 3rd party filming a crime should not be punished as they are essentially making a record of something that has happened, like journalists do.

Google adds tool to block shabby, dirty, vulgar sites from search results

ph0b0s

This is the type of stuff we need.

Rather than opt in internet, we need systems like this so that people can setup for themselves what websites are available for them and for children. This is only a start system and needs further functionality. But it is a start in the right direction. Give the power to control to the users rather than be forced by governments.

Oh I am starting to sound very a bit right wing now, so I will stop there.

Croatian brainboxes deploy calculus-based CAPTCHA

ph0b0s
Thumb Up

And I thought

working in IT, I would never get to use my Physics Degree....

Page: