Re: Hardly a surprise...
David Nutt is who you are thinking about.
3274 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
David Nutt is who you are thinking about.
...and we have more engines than the typical two of most airliners, then exceeding airline safety should be possible.
The early attempts at building a vertical take-off & landing aircraft had multiple engines producing thrust. They discovered that having multiple engines did not increase reliability but decreased reliability (and introduced lost more complexity). Hence why the Harrier jet has just one engine.
If an engine has a failure rate of once every 10,000 hours, one engine out of four will have a failure rate of 1 in 2,500 hours.
Notice how many of the new jets just tend to have just two engines rather than four (or more)? It's partly about cost, and partly to do with reliability figures. Also note that two engine planes have to be capable of flying with just one engine.
Will Apple's share price really be affected by only selling 245 million iPhone-Xs? I mean, that's only 4% short of analyst's expectations. As the figures are based on vague assumptions, how accurate can either of them be? (Are these the same analysts who also claimed Windows phone would become a major force in mobile phones within a couple of years of launch....?)
Assuming Apple really do make a profit of 40% on iPhones, those missing 10 million handsets will mean $4 million dollars in less profit over a year. Will that really be that noticeable in Apple's figures, bearing in mind Apple generally talk about revenue & profit in the billions?
This sort of off-again on-again crap is why NASA can't get it's shit together and accomplish anything.
It might also have something to do with members of congress being bought-off by the big aerospace companies to keep their plants open, despite the projects they're working on being turkeys.
We still manage trains up to every 2 minutes on the Victoria Line of the London Underground
Actually, the Victoria line is now hitting 90 seconds between trains during rush hour. See London Reconnections for (another) excellent article.
Trains on the London Victoria tube line have also been automated since the line opened. The meatsack at the front just opens & closes the doors and presses "Go": A job the platform staff could easily do via a remote.
If you look at some of the safety systems on trains (speed limiters, obeying signals, being awake, etc) they're just there to ensure the meatsack does what it's supposed to do (The electronic dog). So why not just remove the meatsack? As others have mentioned, trains are so big and heavy that they couldn't stop in seconds if the meatsack saw an obstruction on the line.
The main reason driver automation hasn't been done (In the UK at least) is the trade unions.
The London Reconnections blog has an article on TFL withdrawing Uber's license at www.londonreconnections.com/2017/understanding-uber-not-app/.
If its TL;DR: One apparently key piece of evidence TfL used in assessing whether to renew Uber's license was a letter from the Police, where the Police state that Uber are not as forthcoming as they should be about allegations against their drivers.
One interesting fact from the article: In New York, your Uber fair only covers 41% of the cost of making the journey. So Uber are bankrolling journeys to quite a hefty degree.
To be fair to the Comp. Sci. graduates, at least they're getting a qualification that is vaguely applicable to the modern world.
What about those doing "Classics" or "History of Art" (to name but two). There can't be that many openings for people with useless degrees: I mean, the House of Commons only has 650 seats...
Planning [...] quitting development altogether and going in to primary school teaching
My partner recently quit teaching. They loved the teaching and working with the kids. They hated spending all evening and a fair amount of the weekend marking, lesson planning, writing reports, plus loosing lunch breaks to meetings, etc.
I had a friend who quit teaching after just one year because they said the amount of work you were expected to do was unsustainable.
Six week summer holidays sound great. But a 60-70 hour working week - often with little respect from kids or their parents ain't worth it.
The problem isn't universal. It's more a iOS11/Server 2016 interropability issue. Clearly Microsoft's servers aren't all on the latest version of Windows Server.
This BBC Article tries to explain the £350 million rebate claim.
So how is this different/complementary to the Sloan survey?
This article is written in a very misleading manner. It leads you to believe that Cisco have announced that 42 products are affected by the Struts bug.
That is most definitely NOT what the Cisco advisory (currently) says:
At the time of publication, no Cisco products are known to be affected by this vulnerability.
The Cisco article just lists 42 products that are being investigated to see if they are affected by the bug. As their investigations proceed, I expect some products will be affected. But right now, no products are listed as being affected.
Tabloid journalism at its best.
and presumably the force removed her limbs as well
Ahh, they got clean ripped off as he pulled her body out of the sub.
In the end, he had to sink the sub as there was bloody *everywhere*. It was going to be easier to build a new sub and claim she'd disappeared than face the clean up.
We're going back quickly to older times when workers were just cattle.
What do you mean "going back to"? For any moderate to large company, workers are just cattle. Why do you think the department that manages them is called "Human Resources"? Staff are just resources to be exploited for as long as necessary and no longer.
More likely to be just marketing fluff.
I agree. Cisco & Apple made a big fanfare about their tie-up a while ago. What's come out of it? Bugger all. At one customer event, I heard someone ask a Cisco employee about this, and the Cisco bod, basically, just shrugged their shoulders.
Also, we have unfair contracts protection. Basically, big business can't stack the deck against little consumer*.
* In theory....
Instart's code also detects network analysis tool[s] Wireshark....
How can Javascript running in a browser detect a specific process running outside the browser?
Following the link in the article, I can't see that it mentions detecting Wireshark, only that it might be able to detect a Chrome network diagnostic tool.
It all comes down to numbers...
Stella Rimmington, the ex Head of MI5, has said before that you can't follow every suspect 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Secondly, breaking/opening more cryptographic communications will result in more data about suspects. But more data does not mean you have more information on them. It just means you have more crap to sort through to find the nuggets you need.