So the fighter aircraft we bought can't actually be used in real fights. To achieve that, we have to pay more money for the Chuck Norris version software.
Nice sales job there by Lockheed.
3275 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jan 2010
I find it an interesting co-incidence that before Intel announce their fixed CPUs, AMD CPUs are trashed with vulnerabilities by a new Security Company based in Israel, are they trying to increase the share price or is it part of a FUD campaign
In this latest AMD case, the Israeli company admitted to shorting AMD's stock.
I was listening to an interview with Ian Hislop (as editor of Private Eye) He said he was amazed at how infrequently journalists now attend court hearings. He thought that journalists are shying away from stories that require more than five minutes work as many people are only interested in reading a few lines about a story before getting bored and moving on.
Long form journalism is a dying art.
...the £500m set aside in the last budget by the UK government "goes nowhere in catching up with the £6bn Obama put into America...
So America has put 12 times as much into electric vehicle infrastructure compared to the UK. Trying to compare UK/USA investment figures is not easy (Apples Vs Oranges). A couple of statistics:
* America has five times the population of the UK. (326m Vs 65m)
* America has 36 times the area of the UK (9.1m km2 Vs 248k km2)
* America has 8 times the number of cars compared to the UK (266m Vs 31m)
* America's GDP is 7 times larger than the UK's ($19.3 trillion Vs $2.5 trillion)
Overall, I don't think the £500m that's been committed in the UK is totally out of line with what America are up to.
It's also possible to fool the display routines into producing a pseudo high-resolution image.
In the days of the 8-bit (and I think 16 bit) home computers, the hardware was simpler and usually well documented so you could perform all sorts of tricks way beyond what the manufacturer originally intended. That's why emulating a lot of this hardware is quite hard as you have to emulate the chips to a very precise level to allow those hacks to work. See this Ars Technica article about the difficulty of doing accurate emulation.
With displaying a screen consuming 793 bytes of precious, precious memory
Actually the ZX81 was a bit cleverer than that. If it detected it only had 1K of RAM, it used a slightly different way to story the screen: It stored each line up to its newline. That way, short lines of text used less memory than long lines. I recall seeing a game that only used the top-left corner of the screen to save memory.
It's commonplace in France, laying off a union or works council rep is almost impossible
At the place where I work, there are several union reps. One works hard at their day day as well as being a reasonable union rep. The others are crap at their day jobs and make lots of noise about their union ties. We can't fire the useless ones due to managements fear of consequences.
Still, it looks like the developers are ok. It seems like they have de-camped to Halfords.
Oh, PLEASE can Halfords give us back those plastic flip cards for selecting the correct wiper blades. The new tablets they put in there are hopeless. They never seem to work when I'm in there....
I think the justices' point is that you can move data very easily with the click of a mouse in seconds with no physical activity or trace. Moving a filing cabinet of documents between jurisdictions involves having to shift something physical cross through customs.
Your comment implies that BT's engineers only do top quality professional work.
Two problems here: Firstly, it assumes BT's engineers are actually doing the work. Around here, I usually see sub contractors working for BT (& Virgin). Secondly, assuming it is a BT engineer and not a subbie, you're assuming the engineer is actually interested in doing a good job, rather than just doing enough not to get fired.
There may be quality BT engineers, but there aren't many of them.
..some areas remain difficult, such as how the in-vehicle solutions will work.
You mean they haven't solved how to provide a solution for vehicles yet? It's not as if the emergency services only have five vehicles between them all. Surely this should have been solved at the design stage as part of their bid, not at the last minute of implementation.
the answer should be, build more deep space communications dishes
I've read multiple times that Nasa's deep space comms system is stretched thin. I've always wondered why something (more dishes on Earth, maybe relay satellites) hasn't been done to increase capacity. I guess it's because improved comms is less sexy than big rockets.
At least in the UK we have the Direct Debit Guarantee. So anything taken from my bank account by DD, by an authorised company must be returned to that account on the day I complain to the bank, with no evidence required. Then they have to prove they had the right to take the money or it stays in my account, and they owe the bank (who have more lawyers than me).
I think someone's finding out that that isn't quite how it works in practise....
Nokia could have dominated if they'd jumped into Android when they had the chance
I think Nokia were in trouble before then. I remember reading an article where a Nokia insider confessed that they were just turning out phone model after phone model with no actual plan or segregation between them. What model got what feature was almost random.
The problem with Android seems to be that most people are in a race to the bottom ('cause it's so easy to produce a cheap Android phone). You have to sell a lot of phones at wafer thin margins to stay alive. That, or you have to have some unique feature that no-one else can copy (that consumers actually want) that you can charge way above cost for.
If women want both a career and a family, then they will have to start choosing men [1] that are also willing to have both a career and a family.
I knew a couple where, to start with, the wife stayed at home to look after the children and the husband went out to work. They quickly realised that the wife had much more earning potential (and enjoyed her old job a lot more than the husband enjoyed his) so they swapped: The husband stayed at home and the wife worked. It worked really well for them.