Painted into a corner
We don't have the way out after all.
http://news.cnet.com/2100-1001-870805.html
126 publicly visible posts • joined 13 Jan 2010
* Major sporting events are often linked to an upsurge in demand for prostitution
which is what this article does
* demand for prostitution ... fuels human trafficking.
easy to verify
* he's determined "to crack down on prostitution and human trafficking in the run-up to the London 2012 Games".
who wouldn't be
It's cheap political talk
I got fed up of hearing "if we do that cool thing / don't do that shitty thing we'll never get it on the networks".
I walked.
I've got a G1 atm. (early adopter syndrome) but next time I might just buy one of these :
http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8700
I too have been distressed by the use of the term "hack" not because of the hacker / cracker / phreaker thing but it just seems so innocent as a term.
Is burglary to become "hacking your house" ?
I think the correct term for guessing your voicemail PIN should be espionage. It's no more hacking than breaking a safe.
Sergeant: Savage, why do you keep arresting this man?
Constable Savage: He's a villain, sir.
Sergeant: ...A villain.
Constable Savage: And a jailbird, sir.
Sergeant: I know he's a jailbird, Savage, he's down in the cells now! We're holding him on a charge of being caught in possession of curly black hair and thick lips!
> One doesn't hear filmmakers complaining ... for having a film certified
Filmmakers don't pay that fee, it's applied to the distributor.
We show over 100 uncertified films a year in our cinema, we are trusted to self certificate by the local council who look after that sort of thing thanks to Cromwell.
In what way would using proprietry software protect me from patent litigation ? It is very clear that end users can be sued along with vendors, that's why Novell & MS were selling patent insurance.
Why else would this happen : Microsoft Buys Patent Insurance
http://dotnet.sys-con.com/node/1275104
Buy you're half right, what's a guy to do ?
[NoScript XSS] Sanitised suspicious request. Original URL [http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=%3Ciframe+src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fnemohuildiin.ru%2Ftds%2Fgo.php%3Fsid%3D1%22++width%3D%220%22+height%3D%220%22+style%3D%22display%3Anone%22%3E%3C%2Fiframe%3E&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=238d23d638f35f34] requested from [http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/17/apple_sql_attack/]. Sanitised URL: [http://www.google.com/#7003607983138734748].
Google holds the keys for the Marketplace, it hasn't let any tablet style device under the awnings. So you can't blame that particular shortcoming at Archos' feet (except for making the Android choice).
Shame the reviewer didn't tryand run mPlayer, the Android iPlayer playing app. My Android 1.5 includes a YouTube player, no mention of if that's included.
When I installed some internet facing machines in a Nottingham police station a few years ago there we had to go to great lengths to label them as internet facing and install a separate LAN for such machines to sit on. The police have a national network already for exchanging data not for public consumption. To find out that a sensitive document was sent in plain text across the internet beggars belief. The rest of the excuses of the how it happened are unimportant. The fault lies right there. That the document was stored on an internet facing machine in plain text should be investigated, not just the poor plod that pressed the wrong button, the button shouldn't be there to be pressed. Woeful.