If it's anything ike their handling of Phorm
It'll all be too complicated
574 publicly visible posts • joined 22 May 2007
Bastard. I was gonna say that.
I was going to expand a bit, tho and point out that TV transmission in the UK for all channels has been via transmitting stations owned and managed by Crown House, which is now owned by Arqiva, which was formed by National Grid Wireless (originally the UK subsidiary of Crown Castle) combining with Arqiva (formerly NTL Broadcast) in September 2008.
So, why the blazes don't we just get one aerial per area, rather than multiple aerials and muletple planning spats.
O2 have recently had their collective testicles kicked over erecting yet another an aerial near me, without proper consent. They have to get it down by Feb 2010.
"the service in our operations around the globe is of very similar standards."
Ye Gods
On the basis of my direct contact with BT customer service, I take it that the "similar standards" include customer service agents with the intelligence and conversational ability of a thermos flask.
I did try once - quite hard - to talk to BT customer service.
It was about as inspiring as having a conversation with a piece of cheese.
The agent simply couldn't or wouldn't understand that I was calling on behalf of my elderly in-laws to ask why a product they'd didn't want and had not ordered had started to appear on their bills, get it removed and get a refund.
In the end I quite simply gave up tryiing to talk to the idiot, even after resorting to words of one syllable.
I wrote to BT customer service.
The in-laws told me the unwanted service eventually disappeared form their bill and that they received a healthy credit.
They never once actually got any other communication - even an apology.
I never, ever had any kind of reply or acknowledgement from BT at all.
Knobwits, to a man.
"they could repackage their product as an application for users to install on their own computer, and which makes recommendations to that user. If it was useful, it might sell."
Would that be similar to things like the Yahoo Toolbar, say. The Yahoo Toolbar is just so darn good and wanted by so many prople that it has to be distributed as a half (or fully?) hidden parasite application to be loaded with genuine applications?
Hate Parasiteware.
An inphormative comment, but I think you'd still get the same number of adverts. Just ones more accurately reflecting what you (and anyone else who happened to have been using the same PC) were interested in yesterday and not what you would be interested in next day.
You may also have to regularly sweep your machine for Rootkits, because you could probably never trust some of the slime entering the market place not to go back to old habits.
You may also have to think about curtailing the kind of browsing you do, because although your machine may be tagged with some kind of unique identity, your browsing interests would have still to be kept *_somewhere_* so they could be associated with the unique identity, and the right garbage - sorry, ads - served up to your ID.
It's be a short step from putting two and two together and deciding who you were.
Don't Private Investigators do much the same from time to time?
If my sodding machine didn't slow to a bloody crawl every morning, with McAfee applications taking dirty great gobbets of PCU time.
Fscking thing.
Paris 'cos it's give me something to do while I'm waiting*
*And I McAfee takes one helluva lot longer than 30 seconds
"We can't be guilty of interception - it's too difficult to explain"
- BT
"Phorm/Webwise is a good thing"
-BT
"Computers in the future may weigh no more than 1.5 tons."
- Popular Mechanics, forecasting the relentless march of science, 1949
"I think there is a world market for maybe five computers."
- Thomas Watson, chairman of IBM, 1943
"I have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people, and I can assure you that data processing is a fad that won't last out the year."
- The editor in charge of business books for Prentice Hall, 1957
"But what ... is it good for?"
- Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, 1968, commenting on the microchip.
"There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home."
- Ken Olson, president, chairman & founder of Digital Equipment Co, 1977
"This 'telephone' has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. The device is inherently of no value to us."
- Western Union internal memo, 1876.
"The telephone will be used to inform people that a telegram has been sent."
- Alexander Graham Bell.
"The wireless music box has no imaginable commercial value. Who would pay for a message sent to nobody in particular?"
- David Sarnoff's associates in response to his urgings for investment in the radio in the 1920s.
"The concept is interesting and well-formed, but in order to earn better than a 'C,' the idea must be feasible."
- A Yale University management professor in response to Fred Smith's paper proposing reliable overnight delivery service. Smith went on to found Federal Express Corp.
"Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?"
- H.M. Warner, Warner Brothers, 1927.
"Jane Cohen, .... added: "But what is really strange is that she doesn't appear as a full figure - you can't see all of her.""
Of COURSE it's got to be a spook. It'd have absolutely nothing to do with the fact that the Google cameras stitch together a mosaic of photos, would it?
Ooooh look, ghostly bollards as well.
Ooooh look, a ghostly straight line of ghostly distortion right where one frame is stitched into the next.
Ooooohh, wooooooooo, woooooooooooo
We demand a ghostly bollards icon. Until then - well, she's probably done something imaginitive with a bollard.