Re: Man, this was predicted day one
People driving RVs have gone to the bathroom while cruise control was on = people are idiots
21371 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
It also depends on what chips you are making
With larger chips (ie server class CPUs) the larger wafer wastes less space around the edges - think tiling a square chip on a circular wafer. with smaller chips these edge-losses are less.
You used to make it back by putting a few smaller chips in the corners, since your process costs are basically per mm^2, but now for sub 10nm features the multi-layer process is so closely tied to the chip you are making you can't mix+match easily at the high end.
As for the business risk, I think that has all changed anyway. You have one maker of mask-steppers, one maker of light sources, one supplier of wafers and 2-3 customers for the cutting edge.
450mm is probably inevitable, the scaling laws just work in your favour
But now it will be TSMC forcing intel to spend $$$$ to play catch up.
What wou;d be super ironic is if Intel convince the US govt to pay them $$$$ to build 300nm "cutting edge" fabs in the USA just as TSMC opens a 450mm line
Didn't PP introduce a rule that if you could obtain another citizenship you can be deported for committing a crime?
Rishi can presumably get an Indian spousal visa, I don't know what Uganda's immigration rules are on offspring but presumably she would be happy to stay in sunny Rwanda while it's sorted out
This was a spacecraft so weight is slightly more of a concern than cost.
The Apollo spacecraft was designed to run at 28V and a thermostat was fitted that would work at 28V. A design change switched that requirement to 65V.
The thermostat would probably be good to 32V, but fitting a part rated for more than twice the design value to a spacecraft, just in case, wouldn't have been good engineering. Especially when everyone else does the same and the Saturn V is left trying to lift a command module built like a battleship.
But that wasn't a fault+repair, it was a management failure.
This is like building that tank, finding that the switch was faulty and resoldering the connection rather than throwing out the tank and making a new one - either way it wouldn't help that version1 was for a 12V switch and version2 needed a 28V switch
No that would just be silly.
What you do is buy a triple leveraged forward contract for cheap electricity with a buyout clause based on the derivative of the peak demand and a sub-mezzanine tranche of gazpacho with the inverse synergy of the wibble index tracked by the global wobble factor
It may be an urban legend - but supposedly the Germans patented an anti-tamper fuse they invented in the 1930s.
When they subsequently delivered some samples to London in the early 1940s the Brits were able to read all about the design and the description of its operation
Yes that was rather my point. There is no difference in "add one cup of chromium" and "put the following magic values into Tensorflow"
The problem is that, in return for telling the world how to make Invar the maker gets a 20year monopoly and then the whole world benefits and everyone can have Invar for ever-after.
With a patent on an AI model there is no giving back to the world because in 20 years that list of weights to recognise a cat won't be of any use to anyone except computer historians