Re: Association of Servicepeople for Software and Hardware Over the Lifetime of Equipment.
"Association of Personal Trainers Over the Lifetime of the Trainee"
APTOLT = Am I missing something ?
21387 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>I love the nostalgia value of my 25 yr old Micra now. In another 25 when electric Johnny Cabs roam the streets it will be quite the sight.
In 10 years only poor people will be driving dead-dinosaur powered cars
In 25 years only rich people will be driving dead-dinosaur powered cars
School children need to be taught that sieges rarely work out for the attackers - if we are going to retake Normandy.
The French should also learn from Crecy and Agincourt to have a plan beyond a disorganized charge at an enemy well equipped with effective projectile weapons (also known as: don't get into an arse kicking contest with a porcupine)
Yes they need to be taught programming so that they understand that computers just follow precise instructions, and errors, given by programmers - so when a government proposes some computer system to do XYZ they know to laugh.
And they should be taught where electricity comes from so when idiots say we can replace all powerstations running on XYZ with magic unicorns they also know to laugh.
But you can leave out all that stuff about ox-bow lakes, nobody needs to know that.
>The big mistake the West made was to demand servitude during the Cold War
Basically said, hello little brown guys, having thrown off your tea drinking foreign masters, welcome your new coffee drinking foreign masters.
When they said no, we magnanimously decided to arm Pakistan and support any of Pakistan 'unofficial freedom fighting' until it became obvious that Pakistan is a basket case and India is our only alternative to China for cheap labour on a massive scale to build iPhones and a large middle class market to buy iPhones
Not sarcasm. British Indian communities voted for Brexit because they were told by conmen conservatives that the Eu made it hard for Indians to come to Britain while letting in all those Poles but once we controlled our own immigration that would change.
Apple is not a Veblen, those products only value is their price. The $25,000 Apple app that was just a ruby picture for example.
Apple could have made a VR system priced like an Apple watch but it would have been very limited and a disappointment. This way they launch something that people need to have a use for to buy. One of those applications might be massive and Apple can produce a $1000 version in the millions.
This is likely better than something like Occulus that was made more like a kickstarter, build the minimal cheap product and hope for enthusiasts to support it. But it was too clunky for anyone except enthusiasts to use.
>fork out 2 grand... so they can sit in some boring virtual conference room and look at disembodied torsos of their work colleagues
Nobody. But architects might buy a few sets so they can walk clients around a building rather than building cardboard models and showing them blueprints.
A remote team of engineers might want to all look at bits of a 3d model rather than asking the presenter to zoom in and left a bit, no other left, no back up... all with a delay while it redraws over teams ... and with a dozen people all interrupting.
I've yet to try a system that works well enough for using your hands in the real world. And these aren't going to be medical approved or tough enough for industrial use.
I'm guessing most of their sales are going to be to people who travel a lot (and turn left at the plane door) and want a private movie screen experience
Hence Apple's release is interesting.
It's expensive enough that they don't want everyone to run out and buy it - leading to disappointment.
But it's a finished product enough that if someone does find a compelling use they can deploy it and Apple can decide if it's a worthwhile market.
It's not the next iPad (yet) but it's also not a geeks-only tech like the Oculus
>In other news, water is wet.
The problem is that Gartner normally put out reports hyping some new technology that immediately crashes.
When they put out a report saying the technology they hypes is shite - it's confusing
Whose paying them to say Apple's new toy is crap?