Re: We must...
The phones would be banned unless they were attached to an assault rifle
21371 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
It works in Germany because the large German engineering companies are effectively nationalised. The government, IG Metal and VW get together and agree on lower wages in return for not moving production abroad and the government agrees to set interest rates to accomodate.
What was the plan for Silicon Valley? A nominal 'worker' on the board alongside the nominal women+ethnic minority or an equal voting power with the shareholders?
Not clear that well paid Amazon programmers with $M share options, poorly paid Amazon warehouse workers, original investors/VCs and banks/pension funds are all going to be exactly on the same page.
Because China has more to lose by losing infrastructure and consumer sales in the West than it gains by getting business at home, especially because no govt dept in China is going to buy Cisco anyway.
It wants a ruling that the US applies US law to US companies irrespective of where their parents are from.
Or more strategically, it forces the US govt to be consistent and ban all Chinese telecoms if it is going to ban Huawei. That means no Lenovo, no Motorola etc
For navigating in your home waters they are rather excellent, although a trifle heavy for carrying while mountaineering.
For dropping precision guided munitions on the fuzzy-wuzzys they are are bit limiting.
Once you have successfully negotiated with the recalcitrant natives to install your navigation beacons it seems rater bad form to then bomb them.
>Considering the UK Government is now run from the Kremlin
The current occupant of No 10 is an Eton and Oxford educated classicist with no obvious skills but who has mysteriously risen to power - hardly the traditional profile of a Russian spy within the British establishment
>As I recall, it was the UK who insisted that that particular bit of regulation was included.
Regulations can be changed,
That surely is the whole point of working within a sensible, democratic, efficient and technocratic organisation such as the Eu.
Neither side would retreat to childish blocking of cooperation for public point scoring or to further political gains in other areas
>Alternatively they can just leave a note for the SWAT team that they've upped sticks and gone
The people working on it are still mostly in the USA, it is only the brass plaque that has moved to toblerone land. The list of companies involved (STM, NVIDIA, IBM) still need to stay off Uncle Sam's naughty list.
If a Chinese company wanted to use RISC it probably doesn't matter to them if the lawyer they are ignoring is a redneck or a gnome.
Because it doesn't make any difference.
The USA can still ban the export and explain to the directors that their employers can also go on the naughty list if they don't cooperate
Of course anyone involved can explain the niceties of Swiss incorporation and international jurisdiction to the SWAT team coming through their door.
No problem they can just hire contractors to do all those jobs.
I'm assuming contract real estate professionals in markets like NY and London are very cheap.
Then you can get the cheapest slave labor cleaners and maintenance contractors - nothing says luxury business space like having a single below minimum wage illegal immigrant per building
Surely that's good for the poor confused consumer
Instead of trying to compare dozens of different plans from different providers they can be assured that their Brand X phone supplied by Provider X will only work with Provider X's network.
And we can ban the import of all those commie phones that might work across networks - for reasons of national security you understand
Because just like an iPhone, making it serviceable makes it much bigger, heavier and more expensive. Parts that can be swapped while wearing a space suit aren't exactly compact.
Hubble is reckoned to have cost 3x as much to make it man serviceable (although some of that was NASA being dumb)
Especially for interpol I imagine they could write the rules so they only need a warrant from one country.
I'm sure the USA would have no problem handing over encryption keys for an Iranian or Chinese warrant. Just like they would have no problem with chinese intelligence agency having a backdoor to the president's iPhone