>That means he also co-owns the Pink Panther!
A Bond, Trump, Sellers cross-over series using deepfakes.
21396 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
>Dame Mary Beard is not exactly a rabid Tory, but I didn't think she was on Vladimir's payroll.
I think she is only recruiting agents for the BBC
Of course it may be that senior tutors don't watch the news and are still busy recruiting agents for the NKVD and are a little worried that the nice Mr Trotsky hasn't published much recently
A) The cabinet are all businessmen and so only have the HP financial calculator - it doesn't have an exponent button.
B) Italy it is bad, but they are Italians, we are British so in Britain it will be NOT bad
C) Lockdown hurt profits, that patch of sand looks comfortable, mind if I stick my head in it ?
D) All of the above
A listed company, owned by banks, pension and hedge funds being sold to a hedge fund owned by banks , pension and sovereign wealth funds isn't necessarily anti-competitive.
If I'm a customer using ARM cores I don't care if it's listed on the FTSE or the NIKKEI - I do care if I can't buy the ARM cores anymore because it's now owned by a direct competitor
It wasn't British owned before softbank - it was a public company. Its shares were owned by anybody who wanted to buy them
If we wanted it to remain British owned the time to do that was in 1990 when it was formed with money from 2 American companies.
Or perhaps the BBC Micro and subsequently ARM should have been an internal BBC program, then under the BBC management and with BBC investment it would be a world beating British colossus
>This. Confined spaces are dangerous. Head down in a confined space without immediate help is deadly.
But all this safety paranoia in schools, kids today rarely get a chance to play with dinosaurs and so don't learn the dangers.
Perhaps some scary 1970s public information film - like the one about going swimming with death.
A friend built a startup on this with Asterix.
You phoned into a central number before going onsite, it logged your phone# and if you didn't call back to clear the site within a certain time it would alert a pre-programmed contact.
It was just after that estate agent got murdered by someone she was showing a house to in the 90s
But you don't see a certain conflict of interest in an insurance company, that will write profitable policies against ransomware attacks, paying a ransomware gang and so enabling and encouraging it to commit further acts?
Rather like a house insurance company donating crowbars to the charming street urchins of the neighbourhood
>The Irish require documentation from CTA people flying into Dublin
Countries generally require documentation from people flying internally
The interesting question will be do immigration in Dublin have the right to exclude Brits with no reason other than "immigration officer doesn't like your face"?
How does this work if Ireland joined Schengen?
Not advertising a salary is very much a women/minority thing.
If it's a "negotiation" where the employer holds all the cards then Chuck Winchester IIIrd, having more options, is likely to be more able to push for a salary.
A women or minority candidate is less likely to get a job offer and so is less able to push for a higher, or refuse a lower salary offer.
And this is even assuming no bias on the part of the hiring manager
Had an interview with a now defunct Cambridge consultancy who deleted my PhD from my CV before the interview because they didn't think they had the budget for a salary offer
Like they thought a Cambridge physics PhD wouldn't come up in an interview for a technical consultancy in Cambridge, or that I would happily accept a lower graduate salary without noticing !
>I never did understand the reluctance of applicants to bring this up
Because conventionally whoever says a number first loses.
The applicant asks for X, the manager sighs inwardly because they have a budget of X+20%.
The manager says, we only have x-20% in the budget and hopes the candidate is desperate. Worst case the manager promises to ask bi.g boss if they can stretch to X-5%
Double the margins if the applicant is a women or a minority
>The people screening CVs are low paid drones, the people doing the interviews are happy to handle a bit of extra bullshit for the money they'll save.
I would humbly beg your fscking pardon.
You have 4-5 engineers spend 30mins going over their CV and github/projects
Then at least 2 x hour long interviews/presentations to 4-5 engineers, longer with an on-site tour
Repeat for 3-4 pre-screened candidates.
Then a month later you find they turned down the job because somebody in a corporate HQ was trying to save $2K in salary or wouldn't agree to a certain start date or was limiting relocation expenses to $500
>That way if you ask for less than they were prepared to pay, they save money.
And in 6months when you discover you are being paid less than your workmates you leave.
They have just finished the costs of on-boarding (*sorry) and training you but before they have got much value and now they have to start the recruitment process all over again - but they did save 5% on your salary
The CMA is being used to go after white collar crime because it's sufficiently vague you can get a case past crown prosecution.
Emailing secret military plans to the enemy isn't a computer misuse offence.
Shouldn't the police be using the computer missue act to go after Russian, Iranian, N. Korean ransomware hackers?
Very different problems.
In space (at least LEO) you have a relatively low flux (arrival rate) of high energy charged particles. You get memory bit flips, and occasionally localised hardware damage.
In a reactor you get a high flux of lower energy heavy particles that cause structure damage. ECC doesn't help if the ECC checking circuit is smashed to atoms.
This work is specifically for image sensors which are most sensitive for a bunch of reasons.
They are large area, so chances of a hit are high, the silicon is tuned to be sensitive to low signal levels (to detect faint light) and you can't map around a dead image region in software.