Re: IT helps administrate treatments
By which logic, toilets are the heart of the NHS.
See how long you can go without a 'dynamic cloud strategy to leverage data' compared to how long the patient lasts without peeing.
21371 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
The fuel is mostly to nudge it back I to place, L2 isn't a stable minima so any slight movement will cause it to drift away.
Hubble uses the Earths magnetic field to lean on to point itself, ie to unload the reaction wheels. I suspect this will re-point a lot less than Hubble, it doesn't have to avoid the Earth/Sun/Moon as much, it just points mostly in the general direction of 'away'
> jamming, need devices in situ and are of limited range
But if you are using GNSS for military purposes you are generally in limited range of your enemy, and they are probably entirely within their rights to jam your signal.
The best approach is to stick to only attacking enemies with a medieval technological level and hope that Aliexpress don't start selling high power jammers
Galileo specifically has a USA kill switch - it was part of the agreement that the USA wouldn't jam it
The original reason for Galileo was that in the event of a US-Eu trade spat a very-stable-genius US president might turn off GPS across Europe crippling Eu transport - but might not go to the extent of shooting down NATO ally's kit.
No way to boost it. Plan is to let it come down.
Once the panels and truss break off it becomes a bit more brick like and slightly more predicatable.
There are motors on some core bits to do a bit of control, but not enough to give it anything like the precision you would want.
Also to allow the Russian launch site easy access it is in quite a high inclination, so can potentially hit a range of Northern (and Southern but who cares about them) latitudes.
edit: Inclination is 51.5 deg so all of USA, the habitable bits of Russia and Canada and most of continental Europe, but only the southern coast of Blighty, are in the touch down zone
There should definitely be more laws, in fact the laws should be so strict that only the likes of CISCO has the infrastructure to meet them. Then we could have a choice of one $1000 home router.
Anybody else remember the days when you could buy a 300baud modem from BT and that was the only approved modem you were legally allowed to use ?
They were special mil-spec tested batteries - specified for 6 hours use
The manufacturer tests them for an hour, then the importer, then the MOD procurement directorate, then the stores bloke tests them when they arrive, and again when they are issued and then the operator tests them for another hour before deployment.
Just pointing out that historically, launcher programs (prior to SpaceX) had precisely 2 roles.
To hide/spread the cost of your ICBM program.
To demonstrate your national/economic/cultural superiority over the "other".
(And in the case of ISS - to give a funding to your defense companies now that WWIII wasn't on the cards and to stop the USSR's rocket scientists switching to Islam)
Back in t'day when I wor a young researcher (and dinosaurs roamed the Earth)
There was a French European plan to launch a couple of French European astronauts in a Apollo capsule with wings SpacePlane on top of a French European rocket to demonstrate the superiority of French European technology.
Suspicious that this was a French plot to engrandise France the Brits not only vetoed the program but introduced a law banning British involvement in any ESA manned mission
Among the UK scientists the mission, officially Hermes, was known as "Frogs in Spaaaaaaace"
Our first interaction with American marketing people. They ask if we were a Cadillac or VW brand.
Oh definitely VW said the entirely European engineering team. Reliable, sporty , German engineering, (this was the era of Golf GTI not dieselgate)
Not some fat poorly handling, fuel burning American junk driven by old people.