Re: Why is there a problem?
Their parliamentary system is very much based on Westminster but with parties linked with particular social castes and a leader who is all about personality and being the symbol of the country
21371 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Dec 2009
They can if they are generated centrally.
Apple (say) could give out 64bit id to everyone who registers an Apple account, any apps they distribute have that number in their metadata. Then you have another number you use to identify what type of file this is for your app
You can even roll in digital signatures, so not only do you recognise this number as a microsoft doc file you could prove that is was written by a microsoft signed binary.
>Of course, that never stops people thinking they can change a file type just by changing the extension
So why can't it ?
It's an unambiguous task that was described succinctly
It clearly indicates the user's requirements
If you are going to use extensions to indicate type then it's the obvious way to indicate a type conversion
It's like saying "some idiot user thought they could copy a file to a new folder by just dragging the icon - rather than editing the filesystem metadata with edlin - lusers!"
RISC OS on ARM (whatever happened to them?) used a 32bit metadata number to identify the file, IIRC the first 16bits was the software vendor and the rest used for whatever they wanted to identify it as
It also meant that lots of different packages could have bak files without clashing
But you need the US for all your exports.
Hey London, suddenly all your banks don't have access to the US stock markets - you know for security.
And Rolls Royce - the FAA says your engines are no longer approved for Boeing planes.
China: Hey UK you aren't allowed to buy fake Apple earbuds on Aliexpress anymore
Yes but if you are a British govt trying to negotiate a trade deal with the USA to replace all those Eu customers, or find a way to solve an unsolvable Northern Ireland problem with a US president (who is constitutionally required to pretend he is Irish) or you are a UK based world leading chip designer trying to do a takeover deal with a US corporation.
It's important that China can't spy on you
Which is irrelevant if he can't deliver.
He can't pay $$$$ to outbid Apple or Microsoft, never mind TSMC/Samsung, for talent because he has 100K existing employees who are going to want the same.
Stock price is going nowhere so he can't give new hires $1M in options, so he has to pay cash.
He also has to find $100Bn to spend on fabs to even be on the same page as TSMC - nevermind their 5year lead.
Alternately he can lobby that all Federal IT spend has to be on American (designed) chips, and get the states to pay for a new fab while stringing a Xeon monopoly along until the last enterprise customer goes to the cloud
The mythical corporate IT dept in our distant parent company have decided that the CISCO switches we got 3years ago no longer meet the needs of Global Cyber Internet of Things Blockchained Cloud Metaverse and so need replacing with apparently identical CISCO switches - and more importantly there was unspent budget at the end of last year.
CISCO are giving us "end of 2022" as a possible delivery date. Hopefully no new IT buzzwords are invented this year which makes these obsolete
As somebody who assumes that the "adding lightning to sand and making it think" is basically magic and who just does software.
RISC-V just defines an API right ? Presumably there aren't too many innovative new Assembly Language instructions, especially in RISC, they are supposed to be simple right? (This is based on my doing a few weeks of ARM2 assembler after having learned 6502 as a kid)
So what's the massive lead of ARM over RISC-V? Obviously the silicon design of an Apple M1 is incredible, but you get this by being Apple+TSMC, not by buying an ARM license. Presumably Apple could have done the same design around a RISC-V instruction set?
Does ARM supply all the super-scaler / out of order pipeline / branch prediction magic we all rely on - as part of the licence design? Or is it just that there are more optomised ARM core designs out there, more people familiar with them, more tooling, more compilers etc etc ?
Because things like OFAC and EAR controls are going to run up against opensource. If you are in the USA can you accept a pull request on your project from someone in Cuba or Syria or Iran?
Do you have to refuse to supply them with a copy of the source? If that's so are you able to comply with the GPL? Is the GPL invalid in any country that has export controls on opensource software?
It's a lot easier to scare politicians with stories about designs for "chips used in missiles" being given to foreigners than it is to talk about software licenses. If Intel somebody acting purely out of patriotism, gets a case made that you can't collaborate on an opensource chip design with foreigners. Then the same rulings are applied to software.
If the person viewing the source reasonably thought the SSN were secret and shouldn't have been public then he might have broken the law by publishing them - but he didn't, he reported it.
If you find a bunch of papers outside an army base labelled "top-secret" you presumably break the law by reading them - even if the real crime was losing them.
Because most countries have a system to prevent idiots achieving legislative power.
Other nations embrace stupidity
Of course in the UK it would be a crime to simply type a URL
>Neudesic, a US cloud consultancy services firm
>Neudesic has more than 1,500 cloud and data experts ... in India
So is this just a cheap Indian bodyshop operation with a brass plaque somewhere in Delaware ?
Is this just a way for IBM to offshore a lot of jobs without getting unwanted attention
The glut is prophesied to be in 28nm, 2 generations ago, everybody is struggling to build the next gen fans that aren't going to be ready for 3 years.
I doubt you are going to be seeing any $99 clearance deals on Nvidia 3090 cards anytime soon
That's the problem - it's not.
It's what amazon just raised their base programmer salary to. It's less than a new hire programmer at a FAANG here would expect in a couple of years (with options)
It's a lot of money for us regular minions, but for running an entire G7 governments It - it's not. Which means it's either going to somebody who is essentially on secondment from a supplier and is going to get a bonus on the sales, or it is recognised as a holiday job for some friend of a friend with no actual work required.
If you want government IT fixing, hire the boss of IT of Google/Facebook/Amazon and pay them the $$$$ the are worth - it will save you in the long run.
Yes the open source may be better quality than mine but it is likely to also pull in other libraries with other functionality.
I might write a logging library that isn't safe against printing unsanitized strings, but I'm unlikely to accidentally implement remote procedure call functionality from scratch
It's a very difficult market to enter. It costs a lot of money to design a new engine and no customer is going to risk buying from a new entrant without the history, of reliability, servicing, global maintenance facilities.
A few countries make military jet engines locally, they are a lot simpler and you don't need to worry that a spare part and a mechanic will be available in 20years time at the other side of the world.