88mph is all you need
That and a flux capacitor.
2410 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Dec 2009
though I am not expecting to need to do so for quite a number of decades yet.
Compared to described above, being dead - which I am pretty sure feels just like not-having-been-born-yet (and I spent an awrful long time not noticing being in that state) is preferable!
the "monkeys" we evolved from are not the monkeys you see in the zoo today. Common mis-understanding going all the way back to deliberate mis-quotation of darwin by creationists: he never claimed we evolved from monkeys, but that we and other apes evolved from a common ancestor. But claiming the "from monkeys" line is better propaganda, as any political manipulator could tell you.
Many decades ego, they built a medical-grade nuclear facility out in the bush away from Sydney. Then people built houses around it. And now you should hear them whining long and hard about how horrible it is to have a nuclear facility on their doorsteps.
I can guarentee the same will happen here.
All in favour of raising public awareness of the implications of all this tracking. Raising it to the point that it is enonomically unfeasable for browsers to not offer easy tools to block it and sites to not be able to refuse access without it.
But I honestly can't see how legislation or a list to track who doesn't want to be tracked can really help here.
is sorta what school is about. Plenty of words have a second ROFG-inducing meaning. It is the nature of human behaviour: we are sexualy oriented and highly social beings and like to talk a lot and talk about sex rather a lot.
It is a bit like when kids discover that dictionaries have 'rude' words in them:
"Miss, this dictionary has rude words." (said expecting some shocked reaction)
"Does it tell you what they mean and how to use them correctly?"
"Um... yes?"
"Well, that is what dictionaries are for."
I have more than once heard a kid use an obscenity in the playground and had to send them to the classroom to look up why their usage is ludicrously wrong! (Formal education - taking the fun out of childhood for millenia) :-P
In the "developed" world we may be near needs saturation regarding lighting, but there are still huge swathes of the populace who are nowhere near our levels of luxury, but determined to get there (and I certainly won't fault them for that, though will fault us for setting the bar so high to start with). If we can accomodate all these extra people coming in and just break even, we will be doing prety damed good.
Didn't we finally get all that address-obstuficating-workaround-hack clutter *out* of the x86 arch? I'd prefer something very ARM-like but with a re-structured instruction set around a 48-bit flat address space. Or an x86-64 with all legacy instruction/addressing modes stripped might be interesting.
"Intel struck very very very lucky when Windows and x86 (and MS top guys and Intel top guys) hit it off so well together."
Very very lucky considering the IBM engineers that designed the "PC" wanted to use the far superior 68000 but were over-ridden by management because the electric typewriter division already had a re-usable licence for 8086.
You could even let the sites you do want cookies from (for ,say, viewing prefs) set their cookies before locking down the folder. Or just manually unlock it breifly on the rare occasions you feel the site will give value to you from setting a cookie.
While I largely ignore flash, I have web-cookie approval set to manual and never cease to be amazed by how many sites want to set a cookie despite there being absolutely nothing user-preference related on them.
Unless they are being paid to work on a particular feature (and some OSS devs are, but many many more aren't) they don't have to do any damned thing they don't feel like. You are neither the boss of them OR their customer. Unless you are paying for a feature/fix, you are a hanger-on who they are happy to have along for the ride because the seats are going spare.
I (where possible) use the title Tn. (for technician). Except when I am in a Teaching role (I have formal qualifications for both) when I insist on Tr. When I am not operating in any qualified role I eschew a title.
It is rather fun responding to women colleagues who go on as if it is really edgy and modern using Ms. to remove their marital status from their title (admittedly a good thing as far as it goes) by responding that you have abandoned the entire gender designation! I'm never one to do things by half measures. :-D